On Jun 22, 2011, at 2:54 AM, Keith OHara wrote:
> Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes:
>
>> This one will be contentious.
>
> Maybe the various opinions will share a small overlapping area of consensus;
> applying even a small improvement might be enough to make life easier.
>
>> ** Eli
2011/6/22 Graham Percival :
> I see three main contenders:
>
> * emacs x.y.z with extra post-processing: our current
> “official” style with scripts/auxiliar/fixcc.py
> * astyle 2.0.2, possibly with extra post-processing
> * uncrustify 0.58
I'm confused. Are we talking about choosin
2011/6/18 Graham Percival :
> Of people who have git access, what (if anything)
> would make you consider being a mentor? Not everybody
> is cut out to be a teacher; if you don't feel comfortable in that
> position, then it's best not to offer.
I think the answer came to my mind: "i'd spend some
Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes:
> This one will be contentious.
Maybe the various opinions will share a small overlapping area of consensus;
applying even a small improvement might be enough to make life easier.
> ** Eliminate tabs
>
That helps (even though editors should handle ta
This one will be contentious.
** Proposal summary
Speaking academically, C++ code style is a "solved problem". Let’s
pick one of the existing solutions, and let a computer deal with
this. Humans should not waste their time, energy, and creativity
manually adding tabs or spaces to source code.
I
Not much change from the initial one.
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_2.html
** Proposal summary
Many new contributors expect more help than they’re getting. We
should either:
1. give them more help, or
2. tell them up-front that they won’t be getting help. Think of
a roller-coaster e
Hi Ian,
Ian Hulin skribis:
> (for-each ly:load init-scheme-files)
>
> Most of these files assume definitions are going into the default (lily)
> module, but some .scm files lower down the list reference definitions
> declared in a .scm file above it in the list.
>
> My question is this:
>
On Jun 21, 2011, at 11:16 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
>
>> Attaches bound info to beam for better normalized-endpoint
>> calculations
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/4605047
>
> * How does setting left/right-bound-info achieve anythin
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> Attaches bound info to beam for better normalized-endpoint
> calculations
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4605047
* How does setting left/right-bound-info achieve anything?
AFAICS, it is only read in line-spanner.cc
*
last_normal_stem
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 03:01:37PM +0200, Jan Warchoł wrote:
> 2011/6/18 Graham Percival
> > Here's the responsibilities for mentors. Do any of these seem too
> > heavy? We can relax/remove any that are a sticking point for many
> > people.
>
> I see that these are the same that we have in CG p
Hi all,
The original post was sent to the guile-users list and cc'ed here.
Cheers,
Ian
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 03:20:51PM +0200, Jan Warchoł wrote:
> 2011/6/15 Graham Percival :
> > I think the story of this patch
> > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1630
> > http://codereview.appspot.com/4490045/
> > is a horrible black eye for us. Initial patch sent on 2011-04-29
Hi,
I'm currently working on getting Lilypond to use Guile V2 and compiled
Scheme files.
Currently, using V1.8.7, the Lilypond image fires up a lily.scm file
which includes as list of other .scm files. The initialization code in
the program declares a (lily) module and adjusts %load-path enable
Hi,
About enharmonicity:
2011/6/20 Benkő Pál :
>
> with an algebraic pitch representation the test and adjustment would
> look like as follows:
> two pitches are enharmonic iff their interval is in the subspace spanned
> by the enharmonic interval (default: diminished second) and the scale
> peri
On Jun 21, 2011, at 3:31 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> 2011/6/21 m...@apollinemike.com :
>> What I meant is that every time you use a magic number (i.e. 0.35),
>> consider making it user-tweakable unless you are absolutely sure
>> that there is no utility in changing that number.
>
> Ah, you meant t
2011/6/21 m...@apollinemike.com :
> What I meant is that every time you use a magic number (i.e. 0.35),
> consider making it user-tweakable unless you are absolutely sure
> that there is no utility in changing that number.
Ah, you meant this! :)
well, i think that 0.35 in (ly:grob-property grob 'g
- Original Message -
From: "Janek Warchoł"
Have you zoomed the output to check it? I suppose its a rasterization
problem; a lot of things seem to be wrong when output is watched
unzoomed on a computer screen (for example one stem in the attachment
looks two times thicker than the other,
On Jun 21, 2011, at 3:04 PM, lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4609041/diff/12001/scm/define-grobs.scm
> File scm/define-grobs.scm (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4609041/diff/12001/scm/define-grobs.scm#newcode141
> scm/define-grobs.scm:141: (wo
Hi Karin,
i'm back from my short vacation.
2011/6/17 :
> the description explains clearly how to use the parameters gap and woot.
> So, it is a good starting point to understanding the scheme code that
> follows.
Good!
>> Yes, the quanting stays the same.
>
> I couldn't find the verb "to quant
2011/6/18 James Lowe :
>
> Well I'm happy to help and of course I can 'mentor' someone around editing
> doc and formatting and uploading patches, however I seem to be of the 'rare'
> breed here that while understanding 'coding' principles and terminology, has
> no ability to write code (I can ju
2011/6/17 James Lowe :
> Hello
>
> What about 'glyph-space-distance-within-staff-affinity-thing'? cheek>
> Isn't that more in keeping with the new spacing terminology.
Huh? I don't understand. The <> tags don't match!
:P
___
lilypond-devel mailing l
http://codereview.appspot.com/4609041/diff/12001/scm/define-grobs.scm
File scm/define-grobs.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4609041/diff/12001/scm/define-grobs.scm#newcode141
scm/define-grobs.scm:141: (woot . 1)
On 2011/06/17 07:18:49, MikeSol wrote:
This seems like 1337 $p34k -
I ha
2011/6/18 Graham Percival
> Well, I'm not encouraged by the general disinterest in this topic.
I'm afraid it's because this problem isn't about finding some new
solutions or establishing a policy (like with C++ code formatting),
but about doing more work. *Maybe* someone will discover a great ide
On 2011/06/21 09:27:28, Graham Percival wrote:
It would be nice if Neil's concerns could be addressed and we could
move forward
with this patch.
Actually, that patch by itself it not that useful as it might first
look. Its main purpose is to make it possible to print the a2/Solo
I/Solo II tex
LGTM, please push after making the small changes requested by Neil.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4551101/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
It would be nice if Neil's concerns could be addressed and we could move
forward with this patch.
http://codereview.appspot.com/3334043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Thurs 11:00.
default accidental style prints too many 'extra' natural
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
Attaches bound info to beam for better normalized-endpoint
calculations
http://codereview.appspot.com/4605047
Cheers,
- Graham
I can confirm the "cannot compile with this patch applied".
http://codereview.appspot.com/4580041/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
28 matches
Mail list logo
