On 14/12/2011 10:21 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
It would be nice if you adding the above to that tracker issue.
Done.
--
Julien
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
2011/12/14 Martin Tarenskeen :
>
>
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Francisco Vila wrote:
>
>> 2011/12/14 Martin Tarenskeen :
>>>
>>> That does not seem the problem here. I still see these messages.
>>
>>
>> You can produce a minimal PDF from
>>
>> { c' } %END
>>
>> and try launching it into evince. If it s
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Francisco Vila wrote:
2011/12/14 Martin Tarenskeen :
That does not seem the problem here. I still see these messages.
You can produce a minimal PDF from
{ c' } %END
and try launching it into evince. If it shows messages, send it to me.
OK. done -
My console shows t
2011/12/14 Martin Tarenskeen :
> That does not seem the problem here. I still see these messages.
You can produce a minimal PDF from
{ c' } %END
and try launching it into evince. If it shows messages, send it to me.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
LGTM.
In particular, it's a good idea to call communicate() before checking
the returncode, because communicate ensures that the returncode is
set...
http://codereview.appspot.com/5477087/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 03:01:23PM +0100, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Which kind of work is involved?
python scripts.
> There's an issue about it on the tracker?
Probably not. I've pretty much abandoned adding Frog items,
really, since nobody pays attention to them.
> I can find just this:
> http:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 04:04:07PM +0100, Julien Rioux wrote:
> Sure, here it is. Please test make doc before pushing.
Nah, no need. I've pushed it to origin/staging, which undergoes a
complete build (binaries, regtests, doc) from scratch every 6
hours. If there's no problems, it's automatically
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:54 PM, wrote:
> LGTM. Could you send me the final patch so I can push to staging
> immediately?
>
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/5477088/
Sure, here it is. Please test make doc before pushing.
Regards,
Julien
From 7622b10136dd48dafb246659b8a83ebe7f590407 Mon Sep 17
LGTM, but I'm not confident enough about this patch to circumvent our
review process, so please wait for it to go through a normal countdown.
If a tex guru (like David, Werner, or Reinhold) says it's good, I'm
willing to push it to staging directly.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5477087/
__
LGTM. Could you send me the final patch so I can push to staging
immediately?
http://codereview.appspot.com/5477088/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Colin Campbell writes:
> On 11-12-14 04:51 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> made Lilypond complain. convert-ly was able to fix this and produced:
>>
>>\midi {
>> \context {
>>\Score
>>tempoWholesPerMinute = #(ly:make-moment 80 4)
>>}
>> }
>>
>> That is not part
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Ian Hulin wrote:
>
>> I pulled out and tested the examples in separate .ly file and the
>> format that fails is
>> #(define-markup-command (double-box layout props text) (markup?)
>> "Draw a double box around text."
>> (interpret-mark
2011/12/14 Graham Percival :
> 2. the old lilypond.org/web/ pages are still up (and probably
> still in google's cache), various links point to those, which
> gives the impression that our project died 3 years ago or
> something.
> Some of that work needs to be done by you, me, or Han-Wen, but
> mo
On 11-12-14 04:51 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Hi,
I just took the material from
http://nicolas.sceaux.free.fr/prelude/prelude.html> and took a look
of how the current developer version may help in making things nicer to
a user. There is a lot in there (and I think it will make an appearance
in th
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Ian Hulin wrote:
> I pulled out and tested the examples in separate .ly file and the
> format that fails is
> #(define-markup-command (double-box layout props text) (markup?)
> "Draw a double box around text."
> (interpret-markup layout props
> #{\markup \ove
Hi,
I just took the material from
http://nicolas.sceaux.free.fr/prelude/prelude.html> and took a look
of how the current developer version may help in making things nicer to
a user. There is a lot in there (and I think it will make an appearance
in the next LilyPond report) but one thing that ha
Graham Percival writes:
> Umm, have you missed my work on automating patches and fixing the
> CG lately? I want to make sure that we treat *current* developers
> fairly, before trying to recruit new ones. We've lost a *lot* of
> potential effort from Trevor, James, Phil, Colin, probably Adam,
>
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
>> At the moment, the top 3 problems for publicity that I see are:
>
> Okay, now we're getting somewhere. I would like to add a top
> reason
>
> 0. we don't really have a clue what LilyPond's priorities should be,
>and where our individua
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:36:06AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > Well, I personally don't care. If somebody wants to work on
> > advertising, or even better, work on things which encourage other
> > people to do advertising for us, they're welcome to do so.
>
>
Graham Percival writes:
> It attracted positive attention on lilypond-user. I never said
> *how* much attention it received.
Right.
> Well, I personally don't care. If somebody wants to work on
> advertising, or even better, work on things which encourage other
> people to do advertising for u
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:55:04AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > Almost everybody wants stable releases more frequently. They
> > attract positive attention
>
> Are you sure?
It attracted positive attention on lilypond-user. I never said
*how* much attention i
Graham Percival writes:
> Almost everybody wants stable releases more frequently. They
> attract positive attention
Are you sure? On what fora was the 2.14 release announced? Did it
eventually make lwn.net? Has anyone checked how many followers we have
on FB or Twitter (MuseScore, anyone?).
Hi,
When I load a Lilypond-created pdf file in Evince I see a lot of
error/warning
messages in my console. The PDF looks and prints fine though.
Anything to worry about ?
I am working on Linux Fedora 16, using
lilypond 2.15.21
evince-3.2.1
ghostscript-9.04
Attached: the output from my co
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Francisco Vila wrote:
2011/12/14 Martin Tarenskeen :
Hi,
When I load a Lilypond-created pdf file in Evince I see a lot of
error/warning messages in my console. The PDF looks and prints fine though.
Anything to worry about ?
I am working on Linux Fedora 16, using lilypo
2011/12/14 Martin Tarenskeen :
>
> Hi,
>
> When I load a Lilypond-created pdf file in Evince I see a lot of
> error/warning messages in my console. The PDF looks and prints fine though.
> Anything to worry about ?
>
> I am working on Linux Fedora 16, using lilypond 2.15.21
> evince-3.2.1 ghostscrip
Ian Hulin writes:
> Hi David,
> On 13/12/11 22:40, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Ian Hulin writes:
>>
>>> Hi all, ..snip..
>>
>>
>>> I'd like to deprecate this as I think it's nasty, smelly, evil
>>> and kludgy
>>
>> Care to explain why being able to use the same syntax as one uses
>> in the main
Francisco Vila writes:
> 2011/12/13 Carl Sorensen :
>>
>>
>> On 12/13/11 7:06 AM, "gra...@percival-music.ca"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Second draft uploaded; more robust with rebases instead of merge.
>>>
>>>Question: the old docs want translators to avoid rebasing for some
>>>reason. Is that reason stil
27 matches
Mail list logo
