On 2012/04/27 15:01:23, mike7 wrote:
I think the problem is that it tries to do a blanket copy of
everything from the
misc directory into the target directory, but if the build is not in a
separate
build directory, then there will be out/ in misc, which is a
directory.
Sounds like it could
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:14:23AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Then we'll have hard numbers on which developers are abusing the
process. I mean, sure, we all know whose patches tend to be great
and whose patches tend to be problematic...
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 08:26:16AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On 27 avr. 2012, at 08:07, Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:09:39AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
I'd be good to set a precedent for this now so that LilyPond can apply
to other software
Given how things are going, it's past time that we have somebody
else that can make releases. Who's interested in learning?
Requirements:
- powerful computer
- can already compile GUB from scratch
- is well known to lilypond developers (say, at least 1 year of
lilypond development)
- familiar
On 28 avr. 2012, at 09:15, Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 08:26:16AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On 27 avr. 2012, at 08:07, Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:09:39AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
I'd be good to set a precedent for this now so
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:01:27AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On 28 avr. 2012, at 09:15, Graham Percival wrote:
So... you *don't* want to set a precedent; you just want a quick
answer about this specific case? I guess the general consensus is
go ahead and we'll figure it out
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:14:23AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Then we'll have hard numbers on which developers are abusing the
process. I mean, sure, we all know whose patches tend to be
On 28 avr. 2012, at 10:13, Graham Percival wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:01:27AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On 28 avr. 2012, at 09:15, Graham Percival wrote:
So... you *don't* want to set a precedent; you just want a quick
answer about this specific case? I guess the general
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:13:50AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
In fact, if you have to
do half a dozen of iterations before getting things actually right on
the somewhat more than superficial level provided by our tests, you'll
have gained lots of good Karma on the road.
I was thinking that
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:13:50AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
In fact, if you have to
do half a dozen of iterations before getting things actually right on
the somewhat more than superficial level provided by our tests, you'll
have gained
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 8:21 AM
Subject: assistant release manger
Given how things are going, it's past time that we have somebody
else that can make releases. Who's interested in
Hello,
On 28 April 2012 10:59, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
- Original Message - From: Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 8:21 AM
Subject: assistant release manger
Given how things are going, it's past time
Hi all,
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
There's an unexpected problem: i caught some virus and i'm getting
ill. It's too early to say whether i'll be able to do some serious
work in the next week or i'll have to stay in bed, which is extremely
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I like the content of the announcement.
I still don't like the idea of manually editing index.html. I was
expecting/hoping for something like
Documentation/web/twits.txt:
-
The Ensemble 101 is going on a
David, Kieren,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:16 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Nope. I had just sorted some of Kieren's wishes into categories that
were reasonably easy to approach and ones that seemed harder, but I have
not actually managed to start serious work (including thinking about
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:01:27AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On 28 avr. 2012, at 09:15, Graham Percival wrote:
So... you *don't* want to set a precedent; you just want a quick
answer about this
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
Huh? I get $5000 (of which i'll spend quite a lot on Lily
development, either directly or indirectly), and John Marchesi, GNU
admin, gets $500 and gives it to whomever he decides - in our case
most probably FSF.
Depends on whether he gets a
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:14 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
Huh? I get $5000 (of which i'll spend quite a lot on Lily
development, either directly or indirectly), and John Marchesi, GNU
admin, gets $500 and gives it to whomever he decides
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:14 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
So don't think of spending the $5000 on LilyPond: spend your time.
That's what this is supposed to enable.
Of course. They give me money to enable me spending time on LilyPond
Reviewers: Graham Percival, Trevor Daniels,
Message:
Thanks Trevor, this one slipped past my radar.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5976056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely
File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (right):
Karol,
I hope someone can help you do what you wish. It's definitely beyond my
level of expertise. From my point of view on the bug squad, this doesn't
look like something that needs to be handled by us, so I'm going to suggest
that future correspondence on this issue not be sent to the bug squad.
On 28 April 2012 10:30, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
As long as I'm not personally playing nursemaid for people
who don't run the basic tests
It seems that the whole talk about running tests is only because of me not
running them before uploading my first patches because I
Could you please change the mails' subject? :) I've started a thread: Lilypond
patchy and other Lilypond problems for this discussion. Could you move
there?
Łukasz
On 27 April 2012 19:43, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
- Original Message - From: James pkx1...@gmail.com
To:
On 26 April 2012 20:41, Łukasz Czerwiński milimet...@gmail.com wrote:
Mike, Graham and David wrote about more or less automatic running of tests
and presenting only the results, possibly on an unused computer.
I realised that I have a server on Dreamhost that probably could be such a
Hello,
On 28 April 2012 23:18, Łukasz Czerwiński milimet...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 April 2012 10:30, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
As long as I'm not personally playing nursemaid for people
who don't run the basic tests
It seems that the whole talk about running tests is
Hello,
How much CPU time and memory would regtests consume?
Depends on how many CPUs you can allocate. You can run reg tests on 1
CPU or xCPUs. You explicitly state the number in your make command
'make -j7 CPU_COUNT=7' test will use 7 CPUs
'make test' just uses 1 CPU (even if you have more
Łukasz Czerwiński milimet...@gmail.com writes:
On 28 April 2012 10:30, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
wrote:
As long as I'm not personally playing nursemaid for people
who don't run the basic tests
It seems that the whole talk about running tests is only because of me
27 matches
Mail list logo
