Re: Pictures in the docs and website

Graham Percival writes: > No argument there! Yes, more documentation about maintainability > the better. I hope you're joking... The less documentation needed, whether it be for program usage, describing program bugs, build or release process, or maintainability, the better. No one likes to re

Re: Regtest 2.17.13

Phil Holmes writes: > Mainly, it's written in C# on windows, so it > couldn't actually be run as part of GUB. I run it on my desktop Is this an purely added-value, extra nice to have, or does LilyPond somehow depend on it? > If anyone wants to do it, I'd be happy to provide the programs. What

Re: Pictures in the docs and website

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 04:07:41PM -, Phil Holmes wrote: > So we have 2 "master" copies of the pictures (and > also other stuff, like the PDFs). > > My suggestion is that we should treat the LilyPond repo as the > master, Yes, the ones in the main repository are the "master" versions. However,

Re: Caches the interior skylines of vertical axis groups and systems. (issue 7185044)

On 25 févr. 2013, at 23:34, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote: > > On 25 févr. 2013, at 16:29, d...@gnu.org wrote: > >> On 2013/02/24 16:20:53, mike7 wrote: >>> On 24 févr. 2013, at 17:18, David Kastrup wrote: >> "m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:

Re: Caches the interior skylines of vertical axis groups and systems. (issue 7185044)

On 25 févr. 2013, at 16:29, d...@gnu.org wrote: > On 2013/02/24 16:20:53, mike7 wrote: >> On 24 févr. 2013, at 17:18, David Kastrup wrote: > >> > "m...@mikesolomon.org" writes: >> > >> >> On 24 févr. 2013, at 16:37, mailto:d...@gnu.org wrote: >

Re: Regtest 2.17.13

2013/2/25 Phil Holmes : > I've run my pixel comparator on 2.17.13 versus 2.17.12 (note - the output > shows this as 2.17.11 since the windows exe contained the wrong version > number). Output is at > > http://philholmes.net/lilypond/regtestresults/2.17.13/ > > As might be supposed, most of the dif

Document Kievan ligature engraver (issue 7382060)

Reviewers: , Message: Please review. Description: Document Kievan ligature engraver Adds subsection about Kievan ligatures to ancient notation section of notation manual. Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/7382060/ Affected files: M Documentation/notation/ancient.itely I

Re: Regtest 2.17.13

> Maybe we should put span bars and possibly other metrically > challenged elements into the ever-changing regtest. Nice idea! Werner ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Issue 2985: lilypond: Umlauts and other special characters incorrectly exported to PDF meta data (issue 7393055)

LGTM. https://codereview.appspot.com/7393055/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Regtest 2.17.13

- Original Message - From: "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: "Devel" Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:54 AM Subject: Re: Regtest 2.17.13 Phil Holmes writes: > I've run my pixel comparator Nice. Is there any reason for not running this as part of the release process in

custom Lily developer needed

Hello all! I've just secured over a year's worth of (big) commissions, and I'm in negotiations with several companies for new productions of two of my musicals. Long story short: I want (read: "need!") a lot of my Lily-code frustrations fixed in the next short while, so I don't spend countless u

Re: changes.tely: deal with \transposition and instrumentTransposition changes (issue 7404046)

On 2013/02/25 16:02:41, Trevor Daniels wrote: Not quite, but it is hardly a point worth labouring over. Changes are listed with the most recent at the top, and 'previously' means 'earlier in time', so it ought to refer to items lower in the list. Our changes list is not really ordered in stri

Re: changes.tely: deal with \transposition and instrumentTransposition changes (issue 7404046)

On 2013/02/25 00:01:50, dak wrote: Hope I interpreted Trevor's comment correctly. Not quite, but it is hardly a point worth labouring over. Changes are listed with the most recent at the top, and 'previously' means 'earlier in time', so it ought to refer to items lower in the list. Perhaps it

Re: Caches the interior skylines of vertical axis groups and systems. (issue 7185044)

On 2013/02/24 16:20:53, mike7 wrote: On 24 févr. 2013, at 17:18, David Kastrup wrote: > "m...@mikesolomon.org" writes: > >> On 24 févr. 2013, at 16:37, mailto:d...@gnu.org wrote: >> >>> On 2013/02/24 13:27:39, mike7 wrote: On 24 févr. 20

Re: Regtest 2.17.13

"m...@mikesolomon.org" writes: > On 25 févr. 2013, at 15:10, David Kastrup wrote: > >> James writes: >> On 25 February 2013 12:00, David Kastrup wrote: "Phil Holmes" writes: > I've run my pixel comparator on 2.17.13 versus 2.17.12 (note - > the output shows t

Re: Regtest 2.17.13

James writes: > Hello, > > On 25 February 2013 12:00, David Kastrup wrote: > > "Phil Holmes" writes: > > > I've run my pixel comparator on 2.17.13 versus 2.17.12 (note - > the > > output shows this as 2.17.11 since the windows exe contained the > wrong > > version n

Re: Regtest 2.17.13

On 25 févr. 2013, at 15:10, David Kastrup wrote: > James writes: > >>> On 25 February 2013 12:00, David Kastrup wrote: >>> >>>"Phil Holmes" writes: >>> I've run my pixel comparator on 2.17.13 versus 2.17.12 (note - the output shows this as 2.17.11 since the windows exe co

Re: Regtest 2.17.13

James writes: >> On 25 February 2013 12:00, David Kastrup wrote: >> >> "Phil Holmes" writes: >> >> > I've run my pixel comparator on 2.17.13 versus 2.17.12 (note - >> > the output shows this as 2.17.11 since the windows exe >> > contained the wrong version number). Output i

Re: Regtest 2.17.13

Hello, On 25 February 2013 12:00, David Kastrup wrote: > "Phil Holmes" writes: > > > I've run my pixel comparator on 2.17.13 versus 2.17.12 (note - the > > output shows this as 2.17.11 since the windows exe contained the wrong > > version number). Output is at > > > > http://philholmes.net/lil

Re: Regtest 2.17.13

"Phil Holmes" writes: > I've run my pixel comparator on 2.17.13 versus 2.17.12 (note - the > output shows this as 2.17.11 since the windows exe contained the wrong > version number). Output is at > > http://philholmes.net/lilypond/regtestresults/2.17.13/ > > As might be supposed, most of the dif

Re: Regtest 2.17.13

Phil Holmes writes: > I've run my pixel comparator > http://philholmes.net/lilypond/regtestresults/2.17.13/ Nice. Is there any reason for not running this as part of the release process in GUB and having it available next to http://lilypond.org/test/ Greetings, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen

Regtest 2.17.13

I've run my pixel comparator on 2.17.13 versus 2.17.12 (note - the output shows this as 2.17.11 since the windows exe contained the wrong version number). Output is at http://philholmes.net/lilypond/regtestresults/2.17.13/ As might be supposed, most of the differences are connecting bar lines

Re: opening bar check crashes the compiler

Il 25/02/2013 03:33, Steve Yegge ha scritto: Hi Thomas, thanks for the reply. I think there are two issues at play here. One issue is that user input should never crash the program. It took nontrivial effort to track down why my scores were crashing after upgrading Lilypond (since in some dist