Janek WarchoĊ wrote:
i don't understand why would someone not want to have at
least tremolo repeats unfolded
I think everyone does want tremolo and percent unfolded; only volta
needs customization.
The global context already knows (via its Output_def) whether it's
doing layout or midi. So
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot. (If you have
any questions, send them to coordina...@translationproject.org.)
A new POT file for textual domain 'lilypond' has been made available
to the language teams for translation. It is archived as:
Hi all,
I would like to suggest an enhancement in the handling of line breaks
that is useful for copying scores from existing models.
Currently LilyPond can decide about breaks herself or we can manually
force or prevent breaks.
But when copying from or proof-reading against an existing score
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
I would like to suggest an enhancement in the handling of line breaks
that is useful for copying scores from existing models.
Currently LilyPond can decide about breaks herself or we can manually
force or prevent breaks.
But when copying from or
Urs Liska wrote Wednesday, November 27, 2013 10:30 AM
I would like to suggest an enhancement in the handling of line breaks
that is useful for copying scores from existing models.
I suggest a command line option -dkeep-original-breaks for this switch.
That way the user can add that option
Am 27.11.2013 11:55, schrieb Trevor Daniels:
Urs Liska wrote Wednesday, November 27, 2013 10:30 AM
I would like to suggest an enhancement in the handling of line breaks
that is useful for copying scores from existing models.
I suggest a command line option -dkeep-original-breaks for this
Am 27.11.2013 11:48, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
I would like to suggest an enhancement in the handling of line breaks
that is useful for copying scores from existing models.
Currently LilyPond can decide about breaks herself or we can manually
force or
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'lilypond' has been submitted
by the Dutch team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/lilypond/nl.po
(We can arrange things so that
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Of course I can achieve the same with tags. But there will be many
instances where I don't need them anyway because I don't really
care about the state of the original score except for this
simplification while inputting/proofing.
So what? Why hard
Am 27.11.2013 12:25, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Of course I can achieve the same with tags. But there will be many
instances where I don't need them anyway because I don't really
care about the state of the original score except for this
simplification while
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
I'm not talking about pushing something into LilyPond just for my
personal convenience but about adding a usability feature for a wider
audience.
Breaks, and only breaks, that have a special command that can be
disabled from the command line, and that
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
I see nothing wrong with giving a command line option for setting
tags. That sounds useful, and it would most certainly encompass your
use case. It would also fit into LilyPond's current tool set, and
consequently into the documentation.
The way one would
Am 27.11.2013 14:54, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
What I actually want is to add that behaviour as an option to
Frescobaldi's Layout Control Mode.
So what?
I know you don't care about usability features involving graphical tools
such as Frescobaldi, Denemo
Am 27.11.2013 15:01, schrieb David Kastrup:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
I see nothing wrong with giving a command line option for setting
tags. That sounds useful, and it would most certainly encompass your
use case. It would also fit into LilyPond's current tool set, and
consequently
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am 27.11.2013 14:54, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
What I actually want is to add that behaviour as an option to
Frescobaldi's Layout Control Mode.
So what?
I know you don't care about usability features involving
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am 27.11.2013 15:01, schrieb David Kastrup:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
I see nothing wrong with giving a command line option for setting
tags. That sounds useful, and it would most certainly encompass your
use case. It would also fit into
On 11/27/13 8:04 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
But also in this case I would come back and suggest including functions
like
originalBreak =
#(define-music-function (parser location)()
( #{ \tag #'keep-original-breaks \break #} ))
in
Am 27.11.2013 16:25, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
On 11/27/13 8:04 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
But also in this case I would come back and suggest including functions
like
originalBreak =
#(define-music-function (parser location)()
( #{ \tag
On 11/27/13 8:32 AM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
For me this sounds good.
Requiring to write \include original-breaks.ly is significantly better
than requiring to define the commands.
But it would still need a separate switch, presumably through the
command line.
This is true, but it
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'lilypond' has been submitted
by the Esperanto team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/lilypond/eo.po
(We can arrange things so
Am 27.11.2013 16:36, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
On 11/27/13 8:32 AM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
For me this sounds good.
Requiring to write \include original-breaks.ly is significantly better
than requiring to define the commands.
But it would still need a separate switch, presumably
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am 27.11.2013 16:36, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
On 11/27/13 8:32 AM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
For me this sounds good.
Requiring to write \include original-breaks.ly is significantly better
than requiring to define the commands.
But it would
Am 27.11.2013 16:52, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am 27.11.2013 16:36, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
On 11/27/13 8:32 AM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
For me this sounds good.
Requiring to write \include original-breaks.ly is significantly better
than
On 11/27/13 8:45 AM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
Am 27.11.2013 16:36, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
On 11/27/13 8:32 AM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
For me this sounds good.
Requiring to write \include original-breaks.ly is significantly
better
than requiring to define the
Am 27.11.2013 15:52, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am 27.11.2013 14:54, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
What I actually want is to add that behaviour as an option to
Frescobaldi's Layout Control Mode.
So what?
I know you don't
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am 27.11.2013 15:52, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am 27.11.2013 14:54, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
What I actually want is to add that behaviour as an option to
Frescobaldi's Layout
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'lilypond' has been submitted
by the French team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/lilypond/fr.po
(We can arrange things so
Hello,
Am i the only one using lily-git.tcl of the *active* dev team?
I ask because since it was changed a couple of years or so ago that it
*always* assumes you want/need to be on dev/local_working it really
makes it a PITA for me to work with. I've been trying to make a simple
patch this
- Original Message -
From: James pkx1...@gmail.com
To: Devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 9:05 PM
Subject: LILY-GIT PITA
Hello,
Am i the only one using lily-git.tcl of the *active* dev team?
I ask because since it was changed a couple of years or so ago
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'lilypond' has been submitted
by the Dutch team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/lilypond/nl.po
(We can arrange things so that
30 matches
Mail list logo
