Re: Doc: NR section 3.5.x MIDI file creation tidy up (issue 120480043 by pkx1...@gmail.com)

2014-09-28 Thread pkx166h
Thanks Marc. https://codereview.appspot.com/120480043/diff/11/Documentation/notation/input.itely File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/120480043/diff/11/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode2747 Documentation/notation/input.itely:2747: @emp

Re: Roman string numbers (issue 145490043 by v.villen...@gmail.com)

2014-09-28 Thread pkx166h
:) Sorry. Some more tightening of the text. https://codereview.appspot.com/145490043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely File Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/145490043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely#newcod

Re: Roman string numbers (issue 145490043 by v.villen...@gmail.com)

2014-09-28 Thread pkx166h
Welcome back Valentine! P.S. don't forget to update the google tracker (if not using git-cl) - Patch-New means the patch gets automatic testing. https://codereview.appspot.com/145490043/diff/1/Documentation/changes.tely File Documentation/changes.tely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/14

Re: Roman string numbers (issue 145490043 by v.villen...@gmail.com)

2014-09-28 Thread Colin Campbell
On 14-09-28 04:43 PM, v.villen...@gmail.com wrote: Reviewers: , Message: Greetings everybody, here's a thought: the shorthand syntax for string numbers is so useful that it shouldn't be limited to fretted strings, but could also come handy for unfretted strings notation. This is the less dirty

Roman string numbers (issue 145490043 by v.villen...@gmail.com)

2014-09-28 Thread v . villenave
Reviewers: , Message: Greetings everybody, here's a thought: the shorthand syntax for string numbers is so useful that it shouldn't be limited to fretted strings, but could also come handy for unfretted strings notation. This is the less dirty way I could find of making that happen. (Sidebar:

Re: Doc: NR section 3.5.x MIDI file creation tidy up (issue 120480043 by pkx1...@gmail.com)

2014-09-28 Thread marc
https://codereview.appspot.com/120480043/diff/11/Documentation/notation/input.itely File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/120480043/diff/11/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode2747 Documentation/notation/input.itely:2747: @emph{two} @code{\

Re: Let \time in mid-measure work without warning in some cases (issue 143450043 by nine.fierce.ball...@gmail.com)

2014-09-28 Thread dak
On 2014/09/28 06:49:08, dak wrote: On 2014/09/28 06:33:12, dak wrote: > Uh, to answer your question: easy way: probably not really. But if you make an > extra issue "Make \tweak work on \time", your current code will magically create > the warning pointing to the source as a side effect.

Re: Where to put new Scheme engravers?

2014-09-28 Thread Trevor Daniels
Urs, you wrote Sunday, September 28, 2014 10:38 AM > Am 28.09.2014 11:36, schrieb Trevor Daniels: >> >> Most of the engravers are written in C++ and each is a separate >> file in the lily/ directory. There's a little above engravers here: >> >> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/co

Re: Where to put new Scheme engravers?

2014-09-28 Thread David Kastrup
James writes: > On 28/09/14 10:44, David Kastrup wrote: >> Urs Liska writes: >> >>> Hi devs, >>> >>> sorry for the uninformed question, but I don't seem to be able to find >>> an answer in the CG or in the source directory. >>> >>> If I have a new Scheme engraver that I'd like to suggest to be

Re: Where to put new Scheme engravers?

2014-09-28 Thread Urs Liska
Am 28.09.2014 11:44, schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska writes: Hi devs, sorry for the uninformed question, but I don't seem to be able to find an answer in the CG or in the source directory. If I have a new Scheme engraver that I'd like to suggest to be added, where would I look for a place t

Re: Where to put new Scheme engravers?

2014-09-28 Thread James
On 28/09/14 10:44, David Kastrup wrote: > Urs Liska writes: > >> Hi devs, >> >> sorry for the uninformed question, but I don't seem to be able to find >> an answer in the CG or in the source directory. >> >> If I have a new Scheme engraver that I'd like to suggest to be added, >> where would I lo

Re: Where to put new Scheme engravers?

2014-09-28 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: > Hi devs, > > sorry for the uninformed question, but I don't seem to be able to find > an answer in the CG or in the source directory. > > If I have a new Scheme engraver that I'd like to suggest to be added, > where would I look for a place to add it to? > Is there a file (or

Re: Where to put new Scheme engravers?

2014-09-28 Thread Urs Liska
Am 28.09.2014 11:36, schrieb Trevor Daniels: Urs, you wrote Sunday, September 28, 2014 10:07 AM sorry for the uninformed question, but I don't seem to be able to find an answer in the CG or in the source directory. If I have a new Scheme engraver that I'd like to suggest to be added, where wo

Where to put new Scheme engravers?

2014-09-28 Thread Urs Liska
Hi devs, sorry for the uninformed question, but I don't seem to be able to find an answer in the CG or in the source directory. If I have a new Scheme engraver that I'd like to suggest to be added, where would I look for a place to add it to? Is there a file (or a set of files grouped by topi