Paul
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 15:59:18 -0400, Paul Morris wrote:
> James,
>
> On 07/04/2018 09:41 AM, James Lowe wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 1 Jul 2018 17:52:02 -0400, Paul Morris wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks. It turned out I had a new SSH key that I hadn't added to
> >> Savannah yet. So I got it to work b
Paul Morris writes:
> Below is what I got, which doesn't match what you have above. Looks
> like I have ECDSA instead of RSA, or something?
>
> $ git pull --verbose
>
> The authenticity of host 'git.sv.gnu.org (208.118.235.201)' can't be
> established.
>
> ECDSA key fingerprint is SHA256:qRLLJ4
James,
On 07/04/2018 09:41 AM, James Lowe wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jul 2018 17:52:02 -0400, Paul Morris wrote:
Thanks. It turned out I had a new SSH key that I hadn't added to
Savannah yet. So I got it to work by following CG 3.4.9
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor/commit-a
>> What about emulating `scm_is_exact_integer', either in Scheme or in
>> C++? This should make transition to Guile-2 simple.
>
> You mean, complex.
Hmm. I was thinking along the gnulib mechanism which provides
drop-ins for many system functions.
> Get it wrong, and our private version is ge
Paul,
On Sun, 1 Jul 2018 17:52:02 -0400, Paul Morris wrote:
> On 07/01/2018 02:43 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> > Edit your .git/config file and change the repository address according
> > to the Git repository clone command given for developers on LilyPond's
> > Savannah page.
>
> Th
Dan Eble writes:
> On Jul 4, 2018, at 07:29, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Having our own ly_is_integer variant map to the Guile-2 version
>> conditionally is simple, and when we do it wrong, there is an obvious
>> missing symbol at link time. Or stuff works without complaint.
>
> That’s fine, bu
Dan Eble writes:
> On Jul 4, 2018, at 07:29, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Having our own ly_is_integer variant map to the Guile-2 version
>> conditionally is simple, and when we do it wrong, there is an obvious
>> missing symbol at link time. Or stuff works without complaint.
>
> That’s fine, bu
On Jul 4, 2018, at 07:29, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Having our own ly_is_integer variant map to the Guile-2 version
> conditionally is simple, and when we do it wrong, there is an obvious
> missing symbol at link time. Or stuff works without complaint.
That’s fine, but if it’s going to be a prox
David Kastrup writes:
> Werner LEMBERG writes:
>
>>> We probably need some ly_is_integer instead that also checks for
>>> scm_exact_p or so? Guile-2.0 has scm_is_exact_integer but Guile-1
>>> apparently not.
>>
>> What about emulating `scm_is_exact_integer', either in Scheme or in
>> C++? This
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> We probably need some ly_is_integer instead that also checks for
>> scm_exact_p or so? Guile-2.0 has scm_is_exact_integer but Guile-1
>> apparently not.
>
> What about emulating `scm_is_exact_integer', either in Scheme or in
> C++? This should make transition to Guile-
> We probably need some ly_is_integer instead that also checks for
> scm_exact_p or so? Guile-2.0 has scm_is_exact_integer but Guile-1
> apparently not.
What about emulating `scm_is_exact_integer', either in Scheme or in
C++? This should make transition to Guile-2 simple.
Werner
___
scm_is_integer is not nearly a sufficient prerequisite for calling
scm_to_int (well, of course there are size limits but that's not what I
am talking about). Try
{ \repeat unfold #2.0 c'1 }
which crashes in some strange place. Use #2 instead and it works (of
course), use #2.5 and it fails in
Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on 7th
July.
A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be found
here:
http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/
Push:
5364 Simplify Drul_array indexing - Dan Eble
https://sourceforge.net/
13 matches
Mail list logo
