See
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1708#note_1170171295
In a nutshell, this change makes tweaks stored using a dedicated
music type in order to make them taggable.
The change isn't very complicated, but does modify LilyPond in
a somewhat deep way in that it introduces a
On 2022-11-13 1:36 pm, Knute Snortum wrote:
Just a note on the Windows side. Norton did not like lilypond.exe at
all and Windows didn't either. Lots of blocking the program from
writing. I don't know if anything can be done on the LilyPond side.
Do people register their programs and certify
On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 9:38 AM Jonas Hahnfeld via LilyPond user
discussion wrote:
>
> We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.23.81. This is the
> second release candidate towards the next stable version 2.24.0
> expected in December. Please test your scores with this version and
>
> We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.23.81. This is
> the second release candidate towards the next stable version 2.24.0
> expected in December. Please test your scores with this version and
> report back the experience as well as any problems you encounter.
> Please refer to
We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.23.81. This is the
second release candidate towards the next stable version 2.24.0
expected in December. Please test your scores with this version and
report back the experience as well as any problems you encounter.
Please refer to the Installing
> Le 12 nov. 2022 à 22:13, Hans Åberg a écrit :
> Also, see the User list discussion below on that the package at the site does
> not have all Ghostscript stuff in it found in MacPorts or TexLive.
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2022-11/msg00045.html
Jeremiah is talking
> Le 13 nov. 2022 à 16:22, Thomas Morley a écrit :
>
> Nevertheless, _if_ the old code is just (markup->string
> ), would it be possible to leave it untouched while
> running convert-ly? After all it continues to work with 2.23. in this
> simple manor, only inserting a more complex
Am So., 13. Nov. 2022 um 15:43 Uhr schrieb Jean Abou Samra :
>
> Le 13/11/2022 à 14:41, Thomas Morley a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > please consider below (originally for 2.20. _not_ converted):
> >
> > \version "2.23.80"
> >
> > \header {
> >myTitle = "myTitle"
> >myOtherTitle = \markup {
> Le 12 nov. 2022 à 22:38, Jeremiah Benham a écrit :
>
> Hello,
> Does anyone here know how the unofficial Mac bundle was created? I assume
> it was not created using gub. Was it macports? Is there a script you guys
> use to slurp up all the files into a bundle or how are you crating it?
Le 13/11/2022 à 14:41, Thomas Morley a écrit :
Hi,
please consider below (originally for 2.20. _not_ converted):
\version "2.23.80"
\header {
myTitle = "myTitle"
myOtherTitle = \markup { \italic \fromproperty #'header:myTitle }
title = $(markup->string myOtherTitle)
}
\markup {
Hi,
please consider below (originally for 2.20. _not_ converted):
\version "2.23.80"
\header {
myTitle = "myTitle"
myOtherTitle = \markup { \italic \fromproperty #'header:myTitle }
title = $(markup->string myOtherTitle)
}
\markup { "TEST" }
A title is not printed.
Though, I'm at loss,
11 matches
Mail list logo
