quiring guile
1.8, it'll almost definitely be supported for another release.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
Show me your flowcharts and conceal your tables, and I shall continue
to be mystified. Show me your tables, and I won't usually need your
flowchar
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014, David Kastrup wrote:
> Don Armstrong writes:
> > I'm just trying to keep lilypond in Debian.
>
> Yes, that would be very desirable.
So it looks like the guile maintainer is going to be willing to ship
guile 1.8 if lilypond doesn't support guile 2.0.
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014, David Kastrup wrote:
> Don Armstrong writes:
>
> > Could you point me at a list of guile 2.0 bugs which are affecting
> > lilypond? Having that list handy would help me convince the guile
> > maintainer (and also Debian's release managers and
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014, David Kastrup wrote:
> Don Armstrong writes:
>
> > Could you point me at a list of guile 2.0 bugs which are affecting
> > lilypond? Having that list handy would help me convince the guile
> > maintainer (and also Debian's release managers and
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
> OK. I *might* be able to convince the guile maintainer to keep 1.8 just
> for lilypond, but that also might mean that I'll end up having to
> maintain guile 1.8 too.
>
> Could you point me at a list of guile 2.0 bugs which are
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014, David Kastrup wrote:
> Don Armstrong writes:
>
> > What is the current status of #1055[1] (support for Guile 2.0 in
> > lilypond)?
>
> I'm currently working on it. There is a branch dev/guilev2 with the
> current work. Current objective is t
, which will likely happen in February at the latest.
Thanks in advance.
1: https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1055
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
I will not make any deals with you. I've resigned. I will not be
pushed, filed, stamped, in
This (I believe) is
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1000. I've requested
that texi2html stay around for the time being, but it's likely that this
will only be a viable short-term solution.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
Q: What Can a
he most important thing for me is just the licenses of those files;
source I can figure out in most cases.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
[On a trip back from collecting grass seeds in tropical bird stomachs
and being thought by the customs agents to be trans
ex.en.html#restricted-use
2: http://www.debian.org/logos/openlogo-nd.svg
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
We have to face the fact that either all of us are going to die
together or we are going to learn to live together and if we are to
live together we ha
On Fri, 28 Dec 2012, David Kastrup wrote:
> Don Armstrong writes:
> > The attached patch fixes a segfault in mark_smob where s gets
> > optimized away and garbage collected before m goes out of scope,
> > leading to a segfault.
> >
> > There may be other cases o
The attached patch fixes a segfault in mark_smob where s gets
optimized away and garbage collected before m goes out of scope,
leading to a segfault.
There may be other cases of this bug floating around, but I didn't
look particularly hard for them.
Don Armstrong
--
I shall require th
On Mon, 01 Oct 2012, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:51:53 -0700
> Don Armstrong wrote:
> > While it's correct, you can trivially work around this problem by
> > changing
> >
> > #!@PERL@ -w
> >
> > to
> >
> >
to have real manpages for these programs too, but it's at least a
start.]
Don Armstrong
--
Maybe I did steal your heart
and I am such a perfect criminal
that you never noticed
-- a softer world #481
http://www.asofterworld.com/index.php?id=481
http://www.donarmstrong.com
ly my understanding matches all of yours.
Don Armstrong
1: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
--
The solution to a problem changes the problem.
-- Peer's Law
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
__
On Tue, 29 May 2012, Colin Campbell wrote:
> On 12-05-29 06:02 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> >The following patch fixes an issue which keeps lilypond from building
> >properly on GCC 4.7. [It's also almost certainly a bug in addition to
> >this.]
[...]
> Don,
git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index a4bbb2f..f2cb168 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+lilypond (2.14.2-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Fix redefinition of s in Music_sequence::first_start. (Closes
+#672087).
+
+ -- Don Armstrong Sun, 13 May 2012
ke and disbursement of funds
would be handled by SFC or SPI in an open manner.[3] I believe the
overhead for both SPI and SFC are on the order of 5% (though I think
SFC has a non-mandatory overhead), with additional overhead for
transfer fees.
Don Armstrong
1: http://www.spi-inc.org; full discl
th waiting for a fix. :(
Would it be reasonable to have it open /dev/null if /dev/tty isn't a
device? [I haven't written much scheme, but assuming that's ok, I can
whip it up later.]
Don Armstrong
--
"The trouble with you, Ibid" he said, "is that you think you'r
th waiting for a fix. :(
Would it be reasonable to have it open /dev/null if /dev/tty isn't a
device? [I haven't written much scheme, but assuming that's ok, I can
whip it up later.]
Don Armstrong
--
"The trouble with you, Ibid" he said, "is that you think you'r
Complete logs:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=lilypond
Debian bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=572290
Presumably the tests should just not output logs if they don't have a
controlling tty?
Don Armstrong
--
One day I put instant coff
m doing insane things when
I'm building the packages in Debian.]
Don Armstrong
--
Some pirates achieved immortality by great deeds of cruelty or
derring-do. Some achieved immortality by amassing great wealth. But
the captain had long ago decided that he would, on the whole, prefer
to a
ontributors.[1]
As far as distributions go, I know I personally don't want to maintain
guile-1.8, so if at some point it stops being maintained in Debian,[2]
someone else will have to step up and maintain it for us to continue
distributing lilypond.
Don Armstrong
1: This is YA example of
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 03:36:39PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > (There are a significant number of files distributed in lilypond which
> > are under v2 or later, or v3 or later, as well as things like
> > input/mutopia/claop
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
> Don Armstrong wrote:
> > (There are a significant number of files distributed in lilypond
> > which are under v2 or later, or v3 or later, as well as things
> > like input/mutopia/claop.py, which isn't even Free Software, as
inclusion
in Debian (which I naïvely assumed had already been done before I took
over maintenance.)
Don Armstrong
1: I've taken over maintenance of lilypond from Thomas Bushnell;
hopefully I'll be able to keep up with you all. If any of you run
across Debian specific issues, feel free to fi
26 matches
Mail list logo
