Re: Bugreport: Accidental Modern bug when partial bar first

2006-08-01 Thread Marco Gusy
Alle 09:45, domenica 30 luglio 2006, Donald Axel ha scritto: This is an edited reposting of a bugreport. I am reposting so that it is not forgotten amidst a long thread. Thank you Donald, for confirming the bug and putting it in evidence! Marco Gusy

Re: List-culture [was] No Bug nor Feature?

2006-07-27 Thread Marco Gusy
Alle 01:51, giovedì 27 luglio 2006, Donald Axel ha scritto: I hope you get the point: friendly and positive mail-tone is essential for a mail-list cooperation. Do not assume that I do not want to understand your point. And excuse me if I am wrong, after all I (or others) could be helped to

Re: No Bug nor Feature?

2006-07-26 Thread Marco Gusy
Alle 00:11, mercoledì 26 luglio 2006, Donald Axel ha scritto: Don't be annoyed, you can get your money back if you want;-) Of course you didn't get the point and don't want to. I only said I think the program may lead to unwanted results. I'm not annoyed by Lilypond, i'm only annoyed by answers

Re: Bug or Feature?

2006-07-25 Thread Marco Gusy
Alle 21:02, mercoledì 19 luglio 2006, hai scritto: Please read the section on Automatic accidentals in the manual. /Mats modern This rule corresponds to the common practice in the 20th century. This rule prints the same accidentals as default, but temporary accidentals also are canceled

Re: Bug or Feature?

2006-07-13 Thread Marco Gusy
I attach an image of the output. As you can see only the last note have cautionary accidental, not the previous ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Bug or Feature?

2006-07-12 Thread Marco Gusy
Look at the attached example, I'm using modern cautionary accidentals Why is the cautionary accidental on the last note, and not on the previous one? This doesn't happen if you delete the first note. sorry if the bug was solved after 2.8.0 % Lily was here -- automatically converted by

Re: please spread release announcement

2006-03-31 Thread Marco Gusy
* If you report a release somewhere, please send a note to lilypond-devel to prevent double work. did it in www.ziobudda.net ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Vocal music and beaming

2006-03-27 Thread Marco Gusy
Alle 09:48, mercoledì 22 marzo 2006, Marco Gusy ha scritto: (ignoring ties) I meant ignoring slurs, ties are ok ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Vocal music and beaming

2006-03-24 Thread Marco Gusy
Alle 17:25, giovedì 23 marzo 2006, Mats Bengtsson ha scritto: Now I see what you have in mind. Still, using _ to specify melismas directly in the lyrics does not currently in any way influence the way the notes are typeset and I suspect that there's quite much hacking involved to make it work,

Re: Vocal music and beaming

2006-03-23 Thread Marco Gusy
Alle 21:34, mercoledì 22 marzo 2006, hai scritto: I don't really understand what you mean. If you don't want any connection between the lyrics and the notes, just skip \lyricsto and specify the duration of each syllable. If you want information from the lyrics to affect the notes, then you

Re: Vocal music and beaming

2006-03-23 Thread Marco Gusy
Alle 13:09, giovedì 23 marzo 2006, Mats Bengtsson ha scritto: My point is that if you want LilyPond to break a beam whenever there is a new syllable, then it has to know how long each syllable is. If you use \lyricsto, then LilyPond figures out the duration of each syllable based on

Re: Vocal music and beaming

2006-03-23 Thread Marco Gusy
Alle 13:09, giovedì 23 marzo 2006, Mats Bengtsson ha scritto: If you want the beaming to be determined based on the syllables, then LilyPond needs some other method to figure out the duration of each syllable. I meant that the method to deterine syllable duration in lyrics is already

Re: Vocal music and beaming

2006-03-22 Thread Marco Gusy
Alle 15:16, venerdì 17 marzo 2006, Marco Gusy ha scritto: By default, LilyPond supports the opposite, namely that when you use \lyricsto it interprets all manually inserted beams as melismas and only attach one syllable to each beam. But there's an issue: a melisma isn't always

Re: Vocal music and beaming

2006-03-17 Thread Marco Gusy
By default, LilyPond supports the opposite, namely that when you use \lyricsto it interprets all manually inserted beams as melismas and only attach one syllable to each beam. But there's an issue: a melisma isn't always entirely tied in a beam (look at the example in my previous post, the

Vocal music and beaming

2006-03-16 Thread Marco Gusy
Hi, I would like to hear what you think about lilypond and beaming in vocal music. I'm quite sure it's common in traditional engraving to beam together only notes of a melisma. The rule is: two syllabes never are beamed together. I attach a picture as an example. This is Bach Magnificat, the

Re: New manual chapter: Putting it all together

2005-04-29 Thread Marco Gusy
et similar) -how to install fonts/ where lilypond looks for fonts would be great. This because many users don't have a deep knowledge of lilypond and can't figure out how to do this using lilypond reference section. Marco Gusy ___ lilypond-devel

Re: Make fails on Gentoo

2005-04-21 Thread Marco Gusy
Here is a working ebuild jusage: cp lilypond-2.5.20.ebuild /usr/portage/media-sound/lilypond cd /usr/portage/media-sound/lilypond ebuild lilypond-2.5.20.ebuild digest emerge lilypond Don't know why... it complained me once about bad digest... if this happens repeat last two steps Happy

Re: Make fails on Gentoo

2005-04-19 Thread Marco Gusy
Alle 11:32, luned 18 aprile 2005, Mats Bengtsson ha scritto: it's a pity that Gentoo lists 2.5.2 as the latest. Gentoo is a great updated distro, lilypond maintainer should relase ebuilds more often. Marco ___ lilypond-devel mailing list

Re: TeX?

2004-11-07 Thread Marco Gusy
Alle 06:13, domenica 7 novembre 2004, J L ha scritto: I don't know anything about Lilypond's code, but was just wondering how much/whether Lilypond 2.4.x still uses TeX for typesetting of text on scores? Yes it does, but there is a plan to have direct .ps output.. see battle-plan for 2.5

Re: lyricsto incompatible with auto-split durations

2004-10-30 Thread Marco Gusy
Alle 01:28, sabato 30 ottobre 2004, Han-Wen Nienhuys ha scritto: sorry, was in a grumpy mood. I've committed a fix, no promises that it works, though. It's easy at 00:32 am ;-) Thanks, i'll check in next release ___ lilypond-devel mailing list

Re: lyricsto incompatible with auto-split durations

2004-10-29 Thread Marco Gusy
Alle 22:22, venerdì 15 ottobre 2004, Marco Gusy ha scritto: Hi all, in my example if I rip off the \with { \remove Note_heads_engraver \consists Completion_heads_engraver } lyrics is placed correctly, otherwise every note of the system (no matters the voice lyricsto refers to and ties

Re: lyricsto incompatible with auto-split durations

2004-10-29 Thread Marco Gusy
Alle 22:48, venerdì 29 ottobre 2004, Han-Wen Nienhuys ha scritto: Is this bug fixed in latest version? Yes. I've added a note that this is not supported. Ouch! I think autocompletion is very useful when writing renaissance polyphony. Often that music have accents every two or three beats and

[bug] midi2ly uses \notes

2004-10-27 Thread Marco Gusy
Midi2ly creates files with \notes command (not used anymore, right?) Marco ___ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

lyricsto incompatible with auto-split durations

2004-10-17 Thread Marco Gusy
wish i didn't make any syntax mistake in my input Marco Gusy inline: maria_mag.png \header { title = Maria Magdalene composer = Andrea Gabrieli } \version 2.3.18 #(set-global-staff-size 15 ) \context StaffGroup

lyricsto incompatible with auto-split durations

2004-10-15 Thread Marco Gusy
wish i didn't make any syntax mistake in my input Marco Gusy inline: maria_mag.png \header { title = Maria Magdalene composer = Andrea Gabrieli } \version 2.3.18 #(set-global-staff-size 15 ) \context StaffGroup

Re: Uncommon feature: colors

2004-05-21 Thread Marco Gusy
Alle 23:38, giovedì 20 maggio 2004, Edward Sanford Sutton, III ha scritto: http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2004-04/msg00039.html and http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2004-04/msg00040.html should make for some quick reading material for you; its recent too. Ops! I

Uncommon feature: colors

2004-05-20 Thread Marco Gusy
One feature I always looked for in a score program was colored notes (unsuccesfully, of course). It seems a stupid feature, but I think it could be very useful in fugues studying: with this technique you could highlight subject, answers, countersubjects. Do you think this is possible to

Re: LilyPond 2.1.37 released

2004-04-02 Thread Marco Gusy
Alle 21:48, mercoledì 31 marzo 2004, hai scritto: It seems there is no melisma in this reg. test http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.1/input/regression/out-www/lily-1611551125.ly I mean the syllable extender line shouldn't it be bla bla___ bla? Sorry for repating me in this post, but I would like

Re: Addlyrics behavior

2004-03-24 Thread Marco Gusy
Alle 14:52, mercoledì 24 marzo 2004, hai scritto: As you yourself wrote in your previous email, beams are sometimes used instead of slurs to indicate melismas. In that case, it's likely that the automatic beams often don't give the desired melismas. I think they should always do. Look at the

Staccato dot collide with a line

2004-02-25 Thread Marco Gusy
% In the second note from the right ( a-. ) the staccato dot collides with % rows extension (dash) \version 2.1.26 \paper { linewidth = 200\pt } \score { \context Staff = violino { #(set-accidental-style 'modern) \notes \relative c''' {

Accidental creates space when it shouldn't

2004-02-25 Thread Marco Gusy
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.1/input/regression/out-www/lily-1485554506.ly Same as subject... only a bug report ___ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel