In this case the problem seems the font used rather than in the naming.
Immanuel
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 12:02 PM David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Lukas-Fabian Moser writes:
>
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > Am 07.09.22 um 10:19 schrieb Andrew Bernard:
> >> I cant find out what tlasm is. It's a missing
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 7:21 AM David Kastrup wrote:
> Programming languages don't offer different types for distances,
> positions, weights, forces, whatnot.
It's safe to say that programming languages don't typically don't offer
much in the way of types, they do however usually allow you to
I could add it to the lilypond emacs code that is already there, and
do a small writeup in
the docs.
Shall I make a pull request?
Immanuel
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 2:36 PM Luca Fascione wrote:
>
> Maybe we could see if we can rope Immanuel to contribute a short segment to
> the user docs?
>
> L
Today I found out it's quite easy to get point and click working
with emacs as pdf viewer when using the pdf-tools package.
1. Install pdf-tools: https://github.com/politza/pdf-tools
It's available as a package in emacs.
2. put this in your .emacs config
>>>
(defconst lilypond-filename-rx
(rx
A mentor system is mentioned here:
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/contributor/mentors
Unfortunately it does not address how one goes about finding such
a mentor.
Immanuel
--
-- Researching the dual problem of finding the function that has a
given point as fixpoint.
pass the debug flags to the configure call.
CXXFLAGS=-ggdb3 ./configure possible args
you can also build a profiling build throught the same mechanism.
The --with-debug or like switches that a configure call supports should
refer to
extra debugging checks in the code switched on.
i
On Fri, Jul
I don't think that that is how it's supposed to work in autotools in
general, but if
it works: great!
Immanuel
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Benkő Pál benko@gmail.com wrote:
pass the debug flags to the configure call.
CXXFLAGS=-ggdb3 ./configure possible args
you can also build a
g++ defaults to the C++ standard of 2003. 2 years ago a new standard
has been published with a log of improvements.
We've been using selected features from C++11 for a while now, and we are
very happy with the improvements. Features like strongly typed enums
are worth the switch alone.
Today
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:20 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Frédéric Bron frederic.b...@m4x.org writes:
Change them so that they will fail using anything but C++11? That
sounds like it would not buy us anything but trouble at the current
point of time.
OK, I forget that.
I
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:58 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
immanuel litzroth ilitzr...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:20 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
They are also humongous, which means a quite larger amount of work
for GUB.
What do you mean
10 matches
Mail list logo
