Ok.
The problem still remains, though, for the one-measure-long piece in \time
2000/4 . Although absurd, it is possible.
Cheers,
MS
On Jan 12, 2011, at 10:28 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 1/11/11 5:30 PM, Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu wrote:
Unfortunately, I cannot automate the clef
The only change I can see is in collision heads, which adds breathing room
between the stem and the flag (I've attached old and new).
I am not an expert on how much room should be in there - I leave it to someone
else to fiddle with the magic numbers in note-collision.cc to get it right. I
Cheers,
MS
0006-Better-reflects-what-is-actually-under-the-beam.patch
Description: Binary data
0005-Attempt-to-deal-with-smaller-font-sizes-like-cue-not.patch
Description: Binary data
0004-Changes-suggested-by-Carl.patch
Description: Binary data
0003-Intermediary-37-patch.patch
wrote:
Reviewers: MikeSol,
Message:
Looks great, Mike!
You have some code indentation issues that don't match our style. Other
than that, I think it's good to go.
Of course, we do need a regression test as well.
Thanks,
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/3928041/diff/1/lily
All is fixed. Attached is the original patch plus one with Carl's suggested
formatting changes.
I ran all of the regtests and nothing breaks.
I'd like one other person to test these patches out w/ the attached .ly
document to confirm. Then, if there are no other other comments, please push
was terminated by signal 11
make[2]: *** [out-test/collated-files.texi] Error 1
make[1]: *** [local-test] Error 2
make: *** [test] Error 2
Interestingly, when I copy and paste the command, there is no ostensible
failure:
Mike-Solomons-MacBook-Pro:lilypond mikesolomon$
/Users/mikesolomon/devel/lilypond/out
Hey Keith,
I believe the new patch set fixes that problem.
Cheers,
MS
On Jan 8, 2011, at 9:01 PM, Keith OHara wrote:
Mike,
I like it on small scores.
I let your patch compile a symphony and got several unneeded stem
lengthenings per page. I started carving out a reasonable-sized .ly
--2010 Han-Wen
Nienhuys han...@xs4all.nl
Copyright 2011 Mike Solomon
http://codereview.appspot.com/3928041/diff/17001/lily/beam.cc
File lily/beam.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/3928041/diff/17001/lily/beam.cc#newcode969
lily/beam.cc:969: {
No brackets here
http
0002-Fixes-issue-39-by-raising-stems.patch
Description: Binary data
0001-Potential-fix-for-issue-39.patch
Description: Binary data
flag-collision.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
On Jan 7, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Keith OHara wrote: Original Message From: "Mike Solomon&
Kinda meh, but it gets the job done! I've included three patches, including the original.The second preserves the flat beams but gets rid of the crashing lily, whereas the third implements some bendiness.Cheers,MS
0003-Second-pass-on-potential-fix-for-issue-37.patch
Description: Binary data
I've included before and after photos.
Cheers,
MS
0001-Potential-fix-for-issue-39.patch
Description: Binary data
inline: issue39after.pnginline: issue39before.png___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
it causes ambiguity in the rhythm.
Anyway, I'll get on your suggestion and will leave it to others to decide which
one is prettier. In neither case would the solution be very computationally
expensive.
Cheers,
Mike
On Jan 5, 2011, at 23:49, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Mike Solomon
I've included before and after photos.Cheers,MS
0001-Potential-fix-for-issue-39.patch
Description: Binary data
inline: issue39after.pnginline: issue39before.png___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
these to a file using Scheme.
If this sounds like Chinese, lemme know and I can try to cook up a simple proof
of concept depending on what you want to do.
Cheers,
Mike
On Jan 5, 2011, at 11:40, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 1/5/11 8:44 AM, Konstantin kammerm...@gmx.de wrote:
James
Graham,
Looks like Joe fixed this (please correct me if I'm wrong).
I'll keep my eyes out for new critical issues before I take off.
Cheers,
MS
On Jan 2, 2011, at 2:21 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 12:21:24PM +0100, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
I have a flight on
On Dec 22, 2010, at 5:10 PM, Federico Bruni wrote:
2010/12/22 Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu
Hey all,
I am embarking on a new project to make lily dance.
Attached are 3 files:
1) svgdance.svg (best viewed in something that's not Internet Explorer -
click on the notes and/or accidentals
On Dec 22, 2010, at 10:21 PM, Jan Warchoł wrote:
2010/12/22 Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu
1) svgdance.svg (best viewed in something that's not Internet Explorer -
click on the notes and/or accidentals and see what happens!)
Cool! Thanks for sharing :)
cheers,
Janek
PS i opened
Tested and nothing broke. Let me know if you want me to send any output.
Cheers,
M I withhold the right to brag about how fast my new computer is until it
becomes obsolete in 2 weeks S
On Dec 17, 2010, at 11:57 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
- Original Message - From:
this problem? If so, is there a flag I could pass to flex
that'll clear this up? Should I be sending this to the flex list?
Thanks!
Mike
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Sorry for the slow response - I'm having trouble with my copy of the source
(too much tinkering...not enough sleep...). Could someone please run the
appropriate regtests on Neil's patch and see if it breaks anything?
Cheers,
MS
On 9/22/10 12:11 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
hit
me back if you have some time on your hands and would like to help me
improve this feature.
Cheers,
Mike
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
.
None of this is necessarily an impediment to moving forward if you feel
that the user should just be careful, but it does run the risk of leaving an
unchecked way in lilypond to cause a huge time drain.
~Mike
On 9/6/10 6:35 AM, carl.d.soren...@gmail.com carl.d.soren...@gmail.com
wrote:
LGTM
)?
(b) to register the function in various places (what parts of lilypond aside
from the list pure-print-callbacks in scm/define-grobs.scm need to know
about these functions)?
Thanks!
~Mike
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http
Hey all,
Just got 2.13.32 running and got the following message:
warning: couldn't fit music on page: overflow is -0.00
I think it's good to get a warning message when there's spillover, but it
seems odd that an overflow of 0 would solicit a warning message. Thoughts?
~Mike
sent a list of pertinent properties it'd make it more like that I get
it right the first time.
If someone else would care to work on this before me (or if someone
would like to get to know the code by working on this with me), don't
hesitate to chime in.
Cheers,
Mike
On 8/22/10 3:03 AM, David
have getter/setters and I'll write the patches accordingly.
Cheers,
Mike
On 8/20/10 12:00 PM, joenee...@gmail.com joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
While this patch looks fine to me, there are a bunch of other lists with
related functionality. You may want to make some of them public too (or
add
Adder function created.
http://codereview.appspot.com/2020041
On 8/20/10 12:29 PM, Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu wrote:
I don't know the source well enough to know the category of lists to which
you're referring. However, I don't mind making an adder function for this
one list so
syntax changes so that users can update their files accordingly.
http://codereview.appspot.com/1867050
Thanks!
~Mike
On 8/18/10 6:22 PM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 August 2010 23:12, Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu wrote:
Should be good to go!
~Mike
(issue 1867050)
Thank
This makes me wonder...if one creates a grob from the scheme-end, is there a
way that it can get in on the pure-print-callback action? Currently, the
list is not defined publicly. A simple define-public should do the trick,
but I’m not sure...thoughts?
~Mike
On 8/19/10 3:28 PM, Joe Neeman
Done.
http://codereview.appspot.com/1983047
On 8/19/10 7:52 PM, Joe Neeman joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/8/19 Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu
This makes me wonder...if one creates a grob from the scheme-end, is there a
way that it can get in on the pure-print-callback action? Currently
Should be good to go!
~Mike
(issue 1867050)
On 8/14/10 10:20 AM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 August 2010 23:31, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll see if it works tomorrow, otherwise I'll copy them here.
Still no joy. It looks like the base file
Hey all,
Looks a-ok to me: I don't have time to run the regtests now (still
traveling, no battery...), but if they don't break, feel free to push!
~Mike
On 8/15/10 12:10 AM, carl.d.soren...@gmail.com carl.d.soren...@gmail.com
wrote:
OK, I fixed all these things, but I did have a question
On 8/12/10 7:20 PM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
Mike Solomon wrote Thursday, August 12, 2010 10:16 AM
I added an extra symbol check to my event class patch:
http://codereview.appspot.com/1867050
Also, I have a regression test that creates a spanner engraver
from
and specific work that would
contribute towards people's understand of these diagrams. Specifically, if
there's one person who'd like to work on the dox for this, I can be in touch
with him or her directly about how this feature works.
~Mike
On 8/9/10 6:57 PM, Valentin Villenave valen
guide if people feel that'd be
helpful - I think it would given a recent thread on frogs concerning
engravers their complexity), but I don't know if I should submit it as
part of this patch set or as a new issue on Reitveld. Lemme know :-)
~Mike
0002-Symbol-checking.patch
Description: Binary
Hey all,
I wrote the attached bit of code to programmatically create event
classes. It does the job for my purposes, but I'm not sure if it is the
best way to do this. In any case, I'd like to see this functionality become
part of lilypond if possible!
Cheers,
~Mike
P.S. On Reitveld
to Reitveld and are
waiting review. As soon as they get commented upon and (hopefully) applied
to the source, I will send out a regression test.
~Mike
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Sorry for the slew of patches in this vein - as I run into problems while
trying to create a real engraver in scheme, I'm sending these patches along.
http://codereview.appspot.com/1878048
Cheers,
~Mike
0002-Adds-ly-engraver-property-to-engraver-scheme.patch
Description: Binary data
.
If there is sufficient interest in this idea, I think it would be a good way
for newcomers and experienced lilyponders alike to move forward with
outstanding issues.
~Mike
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo
In this email the next, I'm attaching two patches that I think I'll need
to make a fully-functional spanner engraver in Scheme. If any of you know
of better ways to do these things than creating Scheme bindings, please let
me know!
http://codereview.appspot.com/1880050
Cheers,
Mike
0002
http://codereview.appspot.com/1914043
~Mike
0002-Adds-announce-end-grob-to-engraver-scheme.cc.patch
Description: Binary data
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 7/30/10 10:06 PM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 July 2010 14:19, Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu wrote:
This raises an error message if showLastLength is not used to show full
measures.
Ouch. :)
We should always try to continue compilation (leaving aside syntax
errors
This raises an error message if showLastLength is not used to show full
measures.
As I am the worst git-cl user ever, if someone could throw this up on
Reitveld, I'd appreciate it.
~Mike
0002-Fix-for-issue-1173-to-fails-when-asked-to-showLastLe.patch
Description: Binary data
left boundary is anything other than 0. However, I
don'tunderstand lilypond well enough to know:
a) if this is a good assumption
b) if this assumption breaks something else.
As usual, the first person who throws this on Reitveld gets many thanks.
~Mike
0002-Fixes-issue-1116-by-regulating-X
of musics in this
world, if lilypond wants to grow to be as wide-reaching as possible, such a
move seems logical for subsequent versions.
Any ideas would be appreciated!
~Mike
On 7/29/10 7:47 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 04:25:08PM +0200, Mike Solomon
modifications), you
can use the attached.
~Mike
0002-Add-engraver-make-spanner.patch
Description: Binary data
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
2010 19:22, Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu wrote:
Name says it all.
Why do you need this?
Since a Spanner's parent class is Grob, ly:engraver-make-grob should
have no problem creating spanners.
Cheers,
Neil
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
Interesting...thank you.
I completely missed that. Sorry for the clutter :-(
On 7/29/10 9:36 PM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 July 2010 20:34, Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu wrote:
I think that this patch is the easiest way to assure that the break
processing will happen when
, I'd want to see first if there is community support
and if there is a group of people willing to iron out how this change could
be orchestrated.
Cheers,
Mike
P.S. In an unrelated note, many thanks to Patrick for his work on the path
command, which will any day now replace the connected-shape stencil
not to have to change
from one form to another afterwards, so if you think modularity seems like
it could become part of lilypond, I'll tackle my project from that angle.
Thanks!
~Mike
On 7/28/10 7:39 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 04:25:08PM +0200, Mike
thoughts would be appreciated!
~Mike
P.S. If any of you are particularly brave, I will send you a patch with my
source...but it's long...
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
this function is supposed to do, I am not sure if this is a
problem, but if k is not necessary, perhaps:
Box
Font_metric::get_indexed_char_dimensions (size_t) const
{
return Box (Interval (0, 0), Interval (0, 0));
}
would be better?
~Mike
/lilypond/waveform
~Mike
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Responses inlined:
On 7/2/10 4:54 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu writes:
http://codereview.appspot.com/1720046
Hey developers,
Today I had time to finish version 2 of my waveform patch that uses glpk
to do smooth linear interpolation of waveforms
).
~Mike
On 7/2/10 8:31 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 7/2/10 12:03 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 06:12:03PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
It seems nice to be able to add this sort
it would
be intelligent to roll both of them into one. Patrick: can you look at the
patch and let me know what you think? I have no objection to changing my
work if you feel that there is a better way to implement it along the lines
of the patch that you've uploaded.
~Mike
On 6/26/10 2:06 AM, pnor
maneuver is ok.
~Mike
On 6/8/10 4:08 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 03:46:47PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Op dinsdag 08-06-2010 om 12:55 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Mike
Solomon:
[cc: lilypond-devel, for the archives]
Hi Mike,
1) Can I
Thank you Patrick!
All of your comments have been incorporated into a new patch, which draws
the svgs a-ok (see attached).
~Mike
On 6/19/10 12:42 AM, pnor...@gmail.com pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mike,
This is very impressive. Thanks for your work on this. I just have a
few comments
as their lengths (which are the
same, meaning that len(A) = len(B)). Knowing this would save the pain of
using traditional linear algebra solvers, which for a 23x23 matrix is ok,
but for a 10x10 matrix gets cumbersome.
Thank you in advance to any takers who want to help me with this!!!
~Mike
I second the Frog Meister idea: Carl has been VERY kind in helping me waddle
through Scheme programming, and if there is no one w/ the assigned
responsibility to farm out tasks, then I will likely keep pestering him out
of force of habit.
~Mike
On 6/11/10 9:23 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival
Hey Carl,
Your bezier curve suite is wonderful - I need the solver for an entirely
different issue in my waveforms project, which is itching to be thrown on
Reitveld by someone who is more savvy than I! Takers?
~Mike
On 6/8/10 5:59 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
\On 6/8/10 7
read the bit online about how they should be formulated,
but I'd appreciate any comments on the subject in case I'm off the mark.
Thanks!
~Mike
On 6/7/10 12:42 AM, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote:
2010/6/6 Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu:
P.P.P.S. I know nothing about Lilypond's
that has a sampling rate, including spectrograms and graphical
scores.
Many thanks to the first one of you who posts this on Rietveld!
Cheers,
~Mike
P.S. One thing that the code lacks is stable control of intersections w/
this grob and others - is there a standard way to take care of that? I
cheated
the inconvenience, and thanks in advance for your
feedback!
~Mike
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
for each time print
is called, which is N-1 times too many (where N is the length of
broken_into_). The code works just fine, but it is overkill: is there a way
to perform operations on a spanner and its broken_into_'s once before the
print function is called?
Thanks!
~Mike
I tried setting a flag like that, but the problem is that the stencils are
drawn in parallel and not in series, so by the time I've set this flag the
other stencils are done doing their thing :-(
~Mike
On 6/2/10 1:32 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 6/2/10 5:28 AM, Mike Solomon
Good deal! I used a callback - patch to be sent in the not-too-distant
future.
~Mike
On 6/2/10 4:26 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu wrote:
I am toying around with a new spanner, and before it prints, I need to
do
forward
to working with you towards its amelioration as well as the creation of
user-friendly documentation. If there winds up being enough community
support, I would be thrilled to see this feature included in the Lilypond
source code.
Mike Solomon
woodwind-diagrams-text-graphic.ly
Description
GG
EE
In chapter 3 'basic features' I found reference to st to suppress property, but
I can not get into the folder to modify the lines to letters
Can anyone help with this?
Cheers,
Mike
___
lilypond
Hello,
my name is Mike I sent a message a few days ago concerning plug ins for lilypond
and have received no response. Can anyone tell me who might be able to help with
this?
I would like the stave lines to be built from consecutive rows of letters and to
change the colour of each line. (line 1
the comparison to other
languages. Technically, it's not the case, for example, that most
programming languages use { } to enclose expressions.
Regards,
Mike
From c367521fe65ff61c50dcb918ce35cf31613ccebf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:34:58 -0500
to the developers for
creating an otherwise great tool for musicians.
--
Mike Irwin
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
301 - 372 of 372 matches
Mail list logo
