Here's a cropped, 600 DPI png file.
Carl
On 8/31/08 5:07 AM, Francisco Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/31 Carl D. Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've put together an oval-circle code that is less pointy than the
ellipses. I've used two cubic bezier curves.
I think I don't want to push
2008/9/2 Carl D. Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Here's a cropped, 600 DPI png file.
Much better than ellipses, IMHO
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
http://www.paconet.org
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
I've put together an oval-circle code that is less pointy than the
ellipses. I've used two cubic bezier curves.
I think I don't want to push the changes until I get some concurrence from
Reinhard and Francisco.
I've attached a png output of the new code. What do you think?
Carl
On 8/29/08
2008/8/31 Carl D. Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've put together an oval-circle code that is less pointy than the
ellipses. I've used two cubic bezier curves.
I think I don't want to push the changes until I get some concurrence from
Reinhard and Francisco.
I've attached a png output of the
PROTECTED]
To: Reinhold Kainhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Valentin Villenave
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 4:17 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Re: Harp Pedals?
I want the equation of an ellipse that circumscribes a box 2a by 2b.
x^2/xrad^2 + y^2/yrad^2 = 1
On 8/29/08 2:03 AM, Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carl
Why not use an ellipse that just fits _inside_ the rectangle?
Because the object of the ellipse is to circle a rectangle. The rectangle
is a filled box, and the ellipse is supposed to enclose it.
Carl
Why not use an ellipse that just fits _inside_ the rectangle?
Because the object of the ellipse is to circle a rectangle. The rectangle
is a filled box, and the ellipse is supposed to enclose it.
Have you considered that an ellipse could not be optically optimal for
tiny sizes? Some tests
On 8/29/08 10:45 AM, Francisco Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not use an ellipse that just fits _inside_ the rectangle?
Because the object of the ellipse is to circle a rectangle. The rectangle
is a filled box, and the ellipse is supposed to enclose it.
Have you considered that an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 29. August 2008 schrieb Carl D. Sorensen:
Some tests with inkscape show me that an ellipse
(depending on the aspect ratio of the rectangle) could be a little too
'tall', but if the half-axes simply add a fixed amount in x and y to
2008/8/29 Reinhold Kainhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am Freitag, 29. August 2008 schrieb Carl D. Sorensen:
Some tests with inkscape show me that an ellipse
(depending on the aspect ratio of the rectangle) could be a little too
'tall', but if the half-axes simply add a fixed amount in x and y to
Carl D. Sorensen Friday, August 29, 2008 3:25 PM
On 8/29/08 2:03 AM, Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carl
Why not use an ellipse that just fits _inside_ the rectangle?
Because the object of the ellipse is to circle a rectangle. The
rectangle
is a filled box, and the ellipse is
2008/8/19 Carl D. Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've been looking at ellipse code. Once I can get rhythms.itely off my
plate (which is waiting on the beatGrouping patch, one way or the other)
I'll add an ellipse in place of the circle.
Hi Carl,
I've been looking at a way to draw ellipses, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Donnerstag, 28. August 2008 schrieb Valentin Villenave:
2008/8/19 Carl D. Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've been looking at ellipse code. Once I can get rhythms.itely off my
plate (which is waiting on the beatGrouping patch, one way or the
I want the equation of an ellipse that circumscribes a box 2a by 2b.
x^2/xrad^2 + y^2/yrad^2 = 1 (ellipse)
needs to pass through the points (a,b), (-a,b), (a,-b), (-a,-b).
Because of the squared terms, all four points have the same equation.
a^2/xrad^2 + b^2/yrad^2 = 1 (1)
There is an
On 8/18/08 7:36 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Carl D. Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps we should define a new interface --
instrument-specific-markup-interface. It would contain
fret-diagram-details, harp-pedal-details,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 19. August 2008 schrieb Carl D. Sorensen:
On 8/18/08 4:19 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Montag, 18. August 2008 schrieb Valentin Villenave:
I've noticed you tagged this new markup command as music; although
I'm
On 8/19/08 11:19 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 19. August 2008 schrieb Carl D. Sorensen:
Done. I've now commited all my changes to master:
- -) make-line-stencil markup function
- -) harp pedals
2008/8/19 Carl D. Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One issue -- you've left a FIXME in the function for size lookup, but you
are looking up size from the props, so I think the FIXME should go away.
I believe this was actually mine :-)
Cheers,
Valentin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 19. August 2008 schrieb Valentin Villenave:
2008/8/19 Carl D. Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One issue -- you've left a FIXME in the function for size lookup,
Oops, yes, I missed this when cleaning up the code.
but you
are looking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 18. August 2008 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is a patch for stencil.scm, which adds a make-line-stencil that
does exactly that: You call it as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 18. August 2008 schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer:
Am Montag, 18. August 2008 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is a patch for stencil.scm, which adds a
2008/8/18 Reinhold Kainhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 18. August 2008 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is a patch for stencil.scm, which adds a
2008/8/18 Reinhold Kainhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Done, patch is attached. Okay to apply?
Reinhold, this is great!
I've noticed you tagged this new markup command as music; although
I'm fine with it, I wonder if there would be a proper way to regroup
all fret-diagrams and harp-pedal-diagrams in
On 8/18/08 3:41 PM, Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/18 Reinhold Kainhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Done, patch is attached. Okay to apply?
Reinhold, this is great!
I've noticed you tagged this new markup command as music; although
I'm fine with it, I wonder if there would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 18. August 2008 schrieb Neil Puttock:
2008/8/18 Reinhold Kainhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 18. August 2008 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Reinhold
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 18. August 2008 schrieb Valentin Villenave:
I've noticed you tagged this new markup command as music; although
I'm fine with it, I wonder if there would be a proper way to regroup
all fret-diagrams and harp-pedal-diagrams in a same
On 8/18/08 4:19 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 18. August 2008 schrieb Valentin Villenave:
I've noticed you tagged this new markup command as music; although
I'm fine with it, I wonder if there would be a proper
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 18. August 2008 schrieb Carl D. Sorensen:
P.S. Reinhold, I haven't checked the code yet. Have you put
harp-diagram-details as part of the text interface? I think it should go
there, since it is a markup.
No, I haven't. I simply looked
On 8/18/08 4:29 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 18. August 2008 schrieb Carl D. Sorensen:
P.S. Reinhold, I haven't checked the code yet. Have you put
harp-diagram-details as part of the text interface? I think it
2008/8/18 Reinhold Kainhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
lilypond --version produces 2.11.56 here. Why should I be using 2.11.57?
Because you're implementing features which aren't available in release 2.11.56.
Regards,
Neil
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
2008/8/19 Carl D. Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I like instrument as the category.
Yes. instrument is the way to go indeed.
Maybe Instrument-specific markups, since we are talking about an appendix
of all defined markups?
Yes. Instrument-specific markups is great -- and self-explanatory
On 8/18/08 4:58 PM, Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/19 Carl D. Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I like instrument as the category.
Yes. instrument is the way to go indeed.
Maybe Instrument-specific markups, since we are talking about an appendix
of all defined markups?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 19. August 2008 schrieb Neil Puttock:
2008/8/18 Reinhold Kainhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
lilypond --version produces 2.11.56 here. Why should I be using 2.11.57?
Because you're implementing features which aren't available in release
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 01:11:51 +0200
Reinhold Kainhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Dienstag, 19. August 2008 schrieb Neil Puttock:
2008/8/18 Reinhold Kainhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
lilypond --version produces 2.11.56 here. Why should I be using
2.11.57?
Because you're implementing
On 8/18/08 4:47 PM, Carl D. Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
applies to TextScript objects. (I've stated this twice, because I'm talking
about two different directions -- from the grob to the property and from the
grob to the property).
Of course I meant from the grob to the property and
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Carl D. Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps we should define a new interface --
instrument-specific-markup-interface. It would contain
fret-diagram-details, harp-pedal-details, clarinet-diagram-details (once the
woodwind diagrams get added, etc. Then
36 matches
Mail list logo
