On 29/10/13 14:14, James wrote:
On 29/10/13 09:19, Julien Rioux wrote:
On 29/10/2013 4:43 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Julien Rioux jri...@lyx.org writes:
On 27/10/2013 2:09 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
That's good, but the most irritating thing about this patch is not
that i have to solve merge
James pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
In the CG we have nothing for patch-waiting, but just the others,
which leads me on to:
Patch-abandoned: the author has not responded to review comments for
a few months.
Assuming that no one changes a patch-waiting for X weeks, how many
would it take -
On 27/10/2013 2:09 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
That's good, but the most irritating thing about this patch is not
that i have to solve merge conflicts. I'm mainly irritated because a
piece of solid code (maybe it's not as solid as i think, but to know
that i need _reviews_) is laying dormant for
Julien Rioux jri...@lyx.org writes:
On 27/10/2013 2:09 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
That's good, but the most irritating thing about this patch is not
that i have to solve merge conflicts. I'm mainly irritated because a
piece of solid code (maybe it's not as solid as i think, but to know
that i
On 29/10/2013 4:43 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Julien Rioux jri...@lyx.org writes:
On 27/10/2013 2:09 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
That's good, but the most irritating thing about this patch is not
that i have to solve merge conflicts. I'm mainly irritated because a
piece of solid code (maybe it's
On 29/10/13 09:19, Julien Rioux wrote:
On 29/10/2013 4:43 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Julien Rioux jri...@lyx.org writes:
On 27/10/2013 2:09 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
That's good, but the most irritating thing about this patch is not
that i have to solve merge conflicts. I'm mainly irritated
2013/10/27 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
That's good, but the most irritating thing about this patch is not
that i have to solve merge conflicts. I'm mainly irritated because a
piece of solid code (maybe it's not as solid as i think, but to know
that i need _reviews_) is laying
2013/10/26 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
I've now pushed stable/2.18 and synchronized translations to it.
I hereby declare the stable/2.18 branch my sole property, to be ruled
over dictatorially. As long as nobody else pushes to it without my
permission, I pledge to keep and lead it to
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2013/10/26 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
I've now pushed stable/2.18 and synchronized translations to it.
I hereby declare the stable/2.18 branch my sole property, to be ruled
over dictatorially. As long as nobody else pushes to it without my
2013/10/27 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2013/10/26 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
I've now pushed stable/2.18 and synchronized translations to it.
I hereby declare the stable/2.18 branch my sole property, to be ruled
over dictatorially. As long as
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2013/10/27 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2013/10/26 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
I've now pushed stable/2.18 and synchronized translations to it.
I hereby declare the stable/2.18 branch my sole
2013/10/27 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
So, would it be possible to get issue 3239 reviewed? It's waiting for
half a year, and solving merge conflicts when i rebase it gets
irritating.
I don't tell people what they are supposed to review.
Oh,
Jean-Charles Malahieude lily...@orange.fr writes:
Le 22/10/2013 20:06, David Kastrup disait :
b) translation branch
The translation branch will stop getting merged with master. Some
documentation changes from master might get cherry-picked into
translation (I will do that myself), and
Le 26/10/2013 19:17, David Kastrup disait :
Jean-Charles Malahieude lily...@orange.fr writes:
Since nothing has changed on translation since Monday (too many
other things to deal with), I just merged _locally_ master into
it. Would you mind me pushing this before setting the freeze?
Yes,
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Jean-Charles Malahieude lily...@orange.fr writes:
Le 22/10/2013 20:06, David Kastrup disait :
b) translation branch
The translation branch will stop getting merged with master. Some
documentation changes from master might get cherry-picked into
2013/10/26 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
b) translation branch
The translation branch will stop getting merged with master. Some
documentation changes from master might get cherry-picked into
translation (I will do that myself), and translation will get
Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com writes:
2013/10/26 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
b) translation branch
The translation branch will stop getting merged with master. Some
documentation changes from master might get cherry-picked into
translation (I will
I've now pushed stable/2.18 and synchronized translations to it.
Thanks for your hard work!
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Werner LEMBERG wrote Saturday, October 26, 2013 8:07 PM
I've now pushed stable/2.18 and synchronized translations to it.
Thanks for your hard work!
Indeed! Much appreciated, David!
Trevor
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
2013/10/26 Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk:
Werner LEMBERG wrote Saturday, October 26, 2013 8:07 PM
I've now pushed stable/2.18 and synchronized translations to it.
Thanks for your hard work!
Indeed! Much appreciated, David!
Trevor
Thanks a lot!!!
Harm
On 13-10-26 01:51 PM, Thomas Morley wrote:
2013/10/26 Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk:
Werner LEMBERG wrote Saturday, October 26, 2013 8:07 PM
I've now pushed stable/2.18 and synchronized translations to it.
Thanks for your hard work!
Indeed! Much appreciated, David!
Trevor
Thanks
21 matches
Mail list logo
