Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

- Original Message - From: "John Mandereau" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: "Lily devel" ; "David Kastrup" ; "KarlinHigh" Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 8:50 PM Subject: Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

On Fri, 2019-03-22 at 13:41 +, Phil Holmes wrote: > The website is now also updated - I had previously forgotten that I > would > need to update news and VERSION etc. in staging and master. This has > to be > done because the website is built from master automatically. Great! I'm a bit

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

- Original Message - From: "Karlin High" To: "Phil Holmes" ; "David Kastrup" Cc: "Lily devel" Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 11:05 AM Subject: Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch] On 3/22/201

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20

> I created a lilypond group, added my gub user to it and the upload > then went smoothly. I'm now allowing the 2 cron jobs that create > the website to run. The new build should be visible in an hour or > so. Thanks a lot for your efforts! Werner

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

On 3/22/2019 5:43 AM, Phil Holmes wrote: the upload then went smoothly.  I'm now allowing the 2 cron jobs that create the website to run. The new build should be visible in an hour or so. The 2.19.83 binaries are already visible. I downloaded and

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

I created a lilypond group, added my gub user to it and the upload then went smoothly. I'm now allowing the 2 cron jobs that create the website to run. The new build should be visible in an hour or so. I used a new branch (stable/test) cloned from stable/2.20 for the build. Once all is well,

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

Knut Petersen writes: > On 21.03.19 12:04, Phil Holmes wrote: > >> Anyway - it would seem easiest just to create a 'lilypond' group.  >> Does that seem the best way forward? > > In rsync-lily-doc.py we have: > >      system ('rsync --exclude "*.signature" --hard-links > --delay-updates --delete

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

On 21.03.19 12:04, Phil Holmes wrote: Anyway - it would seem easiest just to create a 'lilypond' group.  Does that seem the best way forward? In rsync-lily-doc.py we have:      system ('rsync --exclude "*.signature" --hard-links --delay-updates --delete --delete-after --stats --progress

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

"Phil Holmes" writes: > - Original Message - > From: "David Kastrup" [...] >>> I believe GUB upload uses rsync. >> >> Then it depends on the options used. Some versions Oops. Some options >> of rsync try to preserve group/owner. > > It looks like the command is this from

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: "John Mandereau" ; "Lily devel" Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 10:58 AM Subject: Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: "John Mandereau" ; "Lily devel" Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 10:24 AM Subject: Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

"Phil Holmes" writes: > - Original Message - > From: "David Kastrup" > To: "Phil Holmes" > Cc: "John Mandereau" ; "Lily devel" > > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 8:27 PM > Subject: Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: "John Mandereau" ; "Lily devel" Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 8:27 PM Subject: Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

On Wed, 2019-03-20 at 12:53 +, Phil Holmes wrote: > I understand this would be possible if someone puched a change to > release/unstable without it going through staging/master. However, > in the > life of LilyPond I don't think it has ever happened. so may not be > worth > being too

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

"Phil Holmes" writes: > - Original Message - > From: "David Kastrup" > To: "Phil Holmes" > Cc: "John Mandereau" ; "Lily devel" > > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 7:09 PM > Subject: Re: Can GUB-buil

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: "John Mandereau" ; "Lily devel" Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 7:09 PM Subject: Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

"Phil Holmes" writes: > [snip previous] > > Had a successful 2.20 build today, from my newly created stable/test > branch. However, upload failed as follows: > > test result does not exist for lilypond-2.19.83-1.linux-x86.sh > test result does not exist for lilypond-2.19.83-1.linux-64.sh > test

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

[snip previous] Had a successful 2.20 build today, from my newly created stable/test branch. However, upload failed as follows: test result does not exist for lilypond-2.19.83-1.linux-x86.sh test result does not exist for lilypond-2.19.83-1.linux-64.sh test result does not exist for

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

"Phil Holmes" writes: > From: "John Mandereau" >> >> I'm not completely happy with the current set of instructions on page >> "Minor release checklist", even for a release from master branch: >> merging master into an existing release/unstable branch may import >> undesired changes from the

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

- Original Message - From: "John Mandereau" To: "Phil Holmes" ; "Lily devel" Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 10:54 PM Subject: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch] On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 11:20 +, Phil Ho

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

On 19.03.19 23:54, John Mandereau wrote: but I cannot set LILYPOND_REPO_URL with a local Git repo (i.e. with a "file:" URL) without GUB complaining about unknown VC system, so I use SSH on loopback. The most simple way to solve this problem: Create "lilypond-test" and "lilypond-doc" links 

Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 11:20 +, Phil Holmes wrote: > John, > > Please let me/the list know if you're successful. I completed a non-clean GUB build with stable/2.20 branch, in 1h07min, done after a successful GUB build of master branch (4h05min, on a laptop with Intel Core i7-7500U and Debian