On 2015/02/09 23:46:45, thomasmorley651 wrote:
I'd happily do it, though, why alpabetically? And why only for the
lines with
\accept, could be done for the context-defs as well.
And it's also thinkable to sort it following context-hierarchy: first
bottom-contexts like Voice, then Staff up to
On 2015/02/18 18:53:03, c_sorensen wrote:
On 2015/02/09 23:46:45, thomasmorley651 wrote:
I'd happily do it, though, why alpabetically? And why only for the
lines with
\accept, could be done for the context-defs as well.
And it's also thinkable to sort it following context-hierarchy:
On 2015/02/18 18:57:21, dak wrote:
On 2015/02/18 18:53:03, c_sorensen wrote:
On 2015/02/09 23:46:45, thomasmorley651 wrote:
I'd happily do it, though, why alpabetically? And why only for the
lines
with
\accept, could be done for the context-defs as well.
And it's also thinkable to
On 2015/02/09 06:09:34, lemzwerg wrote:
LGTM. It would be nice if David's checker script could be added, too.
More, I'd consider it a good idea to use the checker on the current
patch again.
There was such a mess that I'm not sure I corrected all.
please review
https://codereview.appspot.com/199460043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM. It would be nice if David's checker script could be added, too.
https://codereview.appspot.com/199460043/diff/20001/ly/performer-init.ly
File ly/performer-init.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/199460043/diff/20001/ly/performer-init.ly#newcode174
ly/performer-init.ly:174:
