Having a rethink on this section, after Graham's comments.
Currently trying to simplify some of the examples and explanations. Also
need to include the \markup function \auto-footnote as well. I'll close
the Reitveld and open a new one when I'm done (hopefully in the next day
or so).
James
http
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
> I guess because we are not indicating a grob i.e.
>
> c-\autoFootnote #'(1 . -1.25)
>
> vs
>
> \autoFootnote #'NoteHead #'(1 . -1.25)
> c4
>
> Which does the same thing.
>
> Mike any comment on this?
>
>
On Nov 4, 2011, at 4:10 PM, pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
> This still needs work but I need some decisions err.. decided and some
> more input from Mike.
>
> James
>
Sorry for the delay! I missed this e-mail.
>>
>
> I guess because we are not indicating a grob i.e.
>
> c-\autoFootnote #'(1 . -
This still needs work but I need some decisions err.. decided and some
more input from Mike.
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/5315053/diff/14001/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5315053/diff/14001/Documentation
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 09:34:12AM +, mts...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> So that's my reasoning. But the question "why didn't Mike..." should be
> addressed to Han-Wen: as he was the one who created it, he may have
> answers that I don't.
ok, good answer.
- Graham
\markup { \auto-footnote a b }
Oh. \auto-footnote is a markup command. I haven't got my claws into
those yet regarding optional arguments.
I suppose I have to take a closer look before suggesting things.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5315053/
___
On 2011/11/02 06:10:38, J_lowe wrote:
4th Draft. Thanks Graham.
@Mike Solomon:
I'd still like an example on how to autofootnote top-level markup if
you can, so
I can remove that technically inaccurate statement.
Just in case you missed it, I'd like to use the same example as I use
for
http://codereview.appspot.com/5315053/diff/14001/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5315053/diff/14001/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1049
Documentation/notation/input.itely:1049: @qq{bottom left} and @qq{t
Oh, by the way, I suggest that you wait for Issue 2003 to go through
before investing too much effort in documenting your interfaces. Then
you don't need a separate interface for "manual" and "automatic"
footnotes, but can just use something like \footnote\default for
autogeneration of footnote m
http://codereview.appspot.com/5315053/diff/14001/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5315053/diff/14001/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1032
Documentation/notation/input.itely:1032: Automatic footnotes create
4th Draft. Thanks Graham.
@Mike Solomon:
I'd still like an example on how to autofootnote top-level markup if you
can, so I can remove that technically inaccurate statement.
Just in case you missed it, I'd like to use the same example as I use
for \footnote in this patch but for \autofootnote a
http://codereview.appspot.com/5315053/diff/8001/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5315053/diff/8001/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1019
Documentation/notation/input.itely:1019:
technically there should be
Third Draft. Thanks so far. James
http://codereview.appspot.com/5315053/diff/5001/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5315053/diff/5001/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1020
Documentation/notation/input.itely
http://codereview.appspot.com/5315053/diff/5001/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5315053/diff/5001/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1020
Documentation/notation/input.itely:1020: There are two types of
footn
second draft
http://codereview.appspot.com/5315053/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5315053/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1025
Documentation/notation/input.itely:1025: All grobs, top-level
Thanks for your work on this James!
Cheers,
MS
http://codereview.appspot.com/5315053/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5315053/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1025
Documentation/notation/inp
Reviewers: ,
Message:
There are a few non-standard indents to show more clearly the footnote
syntax in the @lilypond examples.
Description:
Doc: NR Added new node for Custom Footnotes
This is for Tracker issue 1567
Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/5315053/
Affected files:
17 matches
Mail list logo
