On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:18:54PM +0100, James wrote:
> On 31 August 2012 22:35, John Mandereau wrote:
> > I can change Patchy so that it compresses the show-XXX tree in a xz
> > file, send it to Grenouille via SFTP,
would it be possible to do this over rsync, to allow resuming a
broken connecti
John,
On 31 August 2012 22:35, John Mandereau wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 31/08/2012 alle 18.43 +0100, James ha scritto:
>> I'll need to double check remember that I post links to zipped files.
>> I never checked the size of the show- regtest dir that gets
>> created. That might be larger althoug
Il giorno ven, 31/08/2012 alle 18.43 +0100, James ha scritto:
> I'll need to double check remember that I post links to zipped files.
> I never checked the size of the show- regtest dir that gets
> created. That might be larger although I cannot imagine that png files
> compress that much more
Hello,
On 31 August 2012 14:09, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 02:54:11PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
>> Il giorno ven, 31/08/2012 alle 13.21 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
>> > People like James can build new test results quite quickly,
>> > have them automatically uploade
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 02:54:11PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 31/08/2012 alle 13.21 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
> > People like James can build new test results quite quickly,
> > have them automatically uploaded to Grenouille, and Grenouille
> > can then server them to re
Il giorno ven, 31/08/2012 alle 13.21 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
> That sounds good to me! If we treat Grenouille more like a web
> server than a workhorse, then I think it'll go smoother.
I would have preferred a workhorse, but in its current state it has
proven to be not so well usable a
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 02:04:12PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 30/08/2012 alle 12.52 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
> > Failing that, any other developer could set
> > patch-new to trigger a new test if the discussion suggests that
> > the previous test results are not correct
Il giorno gio, 30/08/2012 alle 12.52 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:38:51AM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> > every new comment on those issues with old patches will trigger a test.
>
> That's definitely overkill! What if I post a comment saying "yes,
> this patch d
Am 30.08.2012 18:10, schrieb Trevor Daniels:
John Mandereau wrote Thursday, August 30, 2012 10:38 AM
There's a non negligible number of old issues with Patch=needs-work:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?can=2&q=Patch=needs_work&sort=-modified&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Stars%20Ow
John Mandereau wrote Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:17 AM
> Il giorno gio, 30/08/2012 alle 08.57 +0100, Trevor Daniels ha scritto:
>> I don't think the patch for this issue should have been tested.
>> It has been marked 'patch-needs-work' since 29 May.
>
> It should have been marked Patch-abandone
John Mandereau wrote Thursday, August 30, 2012 10:38 AM
> There's a non negligible number of old issues with Patch=needs-work:
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?can=2&q=Patch=needs_work&sort=-modified&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Stars%20Owner%20Patch%20Needs%20Summary%20Modified
>
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:38:51AM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> every new comment on those issues with old patches will trigger a test.
That's definitely overkill! What if I post a comment saying "yes,
this patch definitely looks bad"?
> IMHO all issues that have not changed since 2 months and
Il giorno gio, 30/08/2012 alle 09.54 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
> There's no script. Colin Campbell occasionally does it manually.
There's a non negligible number of old issues with Patch=needs-work:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?can=2&q=Patch=needs_work&sort=-modified&col
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:17:26AM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 30/08/2012 alle 08.57 +0100, Trevor Daniels ha scritto:
> > I don't think the patch for this issue should have been tested.
> > It has been marked 'patch-needs-work' since 29 May.
>
> It should have been marked Patch-
Il giorno gio, 30/08/2012 alle 08.57 +0100, Trevor Daniels ha scritto:
> I don't think the patch for this issue should have been tested.
> It has been marked 'patch-needs-work' since 29 May.
It should have been marked Patch-abandoned then (BTW isn't there an
script that is supposed to automate thi
John
I don't think the patch for this issue should have been tested.
It has been marked 'patch-needs-work' since 29 May.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 2547 in lilypond: Fix documentation of
making foot
16 matches
Mail list logo
