clear policy discussions (was: Issue 2648 in lilypond: Repeat Dots and Staff Size in 2.15.41)

2012-07-10 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 01:21:38PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > I mean, we have too few categories for regressions. I can see the > following: -snip- > My personal opinion is that My personal opinion is that we should not discuss major policy changes in the middle of a thread about dots and staf

Re: Issue 2648 in lilypond: Repeat Dots and Staff Size in 2.15.41

2012-07-10 Thread David Kastrup
"Trevor Daniels" writes: > David Kastrup wrote Tuesday, July 10, 2012 4:33 PM > >> "Trevor Daniels" writes: >> >>> David Kastrup wrote Tuesday, July 10, 2012 1:19 PM >>> >>> "Trevor Daniels" writes: > We have the technology to identify the commits that introduce bugs > fairl

Re: Issue 2648 in lilypond: Repeat Dots and Staff Size in 2.15.41

2012-07-10 Thread Trevor Daniels
David Kastrup wrote Tuesday, July 10, 2012 4:33 PM > "Trevor Daniels" writes: > >> David Kastrup wrote Tuesday, July 10, 2012 1:19 PM >> >> >>> "Trevor Daniels" writes: >>> We have the technology to identify the commits that introduce bugs fairly easily. Perhaps once the first rel

Re: Issue 2648 in lilypond: Repeat Dots and Staff Size in 2.15.41

2012-07-10 Thread David Kastrup
"Trevor Daniels" writes: > David Kastrup wrote Tuesday, July 10, 2012 1:19 PM > > >> "Trevor Daniels" writes: >> >>> We have the technology to identify the commits that introduce bugs >>> fairly easily. Perhaps once the first release candidate is made we >>> simply say any commit that introduc

Re: Issue 2648 in lilypond: Repeat Dots and Staff Size in 2.15.41

2012-07-10 Thread Trevor Daniels
David Kastrup wrote Tuesday, July 10, 2012 1:19 PM > "Trevor Daniels" writes: > >> We have the technology to identify the commits that introduce bugs >> fairly easily. Perhaps once the first release candidate is made we >> simply say any commit that introduced a critical regression bug after

Re: Issue 2648 in lilypond: Repeat Dots and Staff Size in 2.15.41

2012-07-10 Thread David Kastrup
"Trevor Daniels" writes: > David Kastrup wrote Tuesday, July 10, 2012 12:21 PM > >>> tdaniels...@gmail.com: Repeat Dots and >>> Staff Size in 2.15.41 >>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2648 >>> >>> This bug first appeared in 2.15.40, so is a critical regression. >> >> I mean,

Re: Issue 2648 in lilypond: Repeat Dots and Staff Size in 2.15.41

2012-07-10 Thread Trevor Daniels
David Kastrup wrote Tuesday, July 10, 2012 12:21 PM >> tdaniels...@gmail.com: Repeat Dots and >> Staff Size in 2.15.41 >> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2648 >> >> This bug first appeared in 2.15.40, so is a critical regression. > > I mean, we have too few categories for regr

Re: Issue 2648 in lilypond: Repeat Dots and Staff Size in 2.15.41

2012-07-10 Thread David Kastrup
lilyp...@googlecode.com writes: > Updates: > Labels: -Type-Ugly Type-Critical > > Comment #2 on issue 2648 by > tdaniels...@gmail.com: Repeat Dots and > Staff Size in 2.15.41 > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2648 > > This bug first appeared in 2.15.40, so is a critical re