On 02/15/2017 07:19 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
Yes, these are the functions created by LY_DEFINE in C++ files.
If I recall correctly there was discussion about auto-documenting "real" Scheme
functions too, but I don't know where this went ...
David Nalesnik wrote a script for this.
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 15. Februar 2017 13:03:55 MEZ schrieb Trevor Daniels :
>>
>>Urs Liska wrote Wednesday, February 15, 2017 8:04 AM
>>
>>> Am 14.02.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
>>>
As these functions are not intended for the usual
Am 15. Februar 2017 13:03:55 MEZ schrieb Trevor Daniels :
>
>Urs Liska wrote Wednesday, February 15, 2017 8:04 AM
>
>> Am 14.02.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
>>
>>> As these functions are not intended for the usual LilyPond user I
>>> don't think the NR is suitable,
Urs Liska wrote Wednesday, February 15, 2017 8:04 AM
> Am 14.02.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
>
>> As these functions are not intended for the usual LilyPond user I
>> don't think the NR is suitable, other than to have them listed in A22.
>> Similarly, they will also be listed in the IR
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 14.02.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
>> Urs Liska wrote Tuesday, February 14, 2017 9:23 AM
>>
>>> my patch https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5067/
>>> http://codereview.appspot.com/317270043 is currently on countdown. It
>>>
Am 14.02.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
> Urs Liska wrote Tuesday, February 14, 2017 9:23 AM
>
>> my patch https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5067/
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/317270043 is currently on countdown. It
>> introduces the procedures
>>
>> - lilypond>?
>> -
Urs Liska wrote Tuesday, February 14, 2017 9:23 AM
> my patch https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5067/
> http://codereview.appspot.com/317270043 is currently on countdown. It
> introduces the procedures
>
> - lilypond>?
> - lilypond>=?
> - lilypond - lilypond<=?
> - lilypond=?
>
>
On Feb 14, 2017, at 04:23 , Urs Liska wrote:
> introduces the procedures
>
> - lilypond>?
[etc.]
> comparing a given version to the one currently compiling the document.
Adding “version” to the name would be clearer.
—
Dan
Hi,
my patch https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5067/
http://codereview.appspot.com/317270043 is currently on countdown. It
introduces the procedures
- lilypond>?
- lilypond>=?
- lilypondhttps://openlilylib.org
http://lilypondblog.org