On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I've made a few clarifications to the original proposal, but
nothing substantial is changed.
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_11.html
** Proposal summary
Our source code hosting is confused: some branches
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 11:50:56AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
* Reserve the savannah lilypond.git repository for logical
branches of master.
I've moved ikebana to
LGTM
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 11:33 PM
Subject: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories (probable decision)
I've made a few clarifications to the original proposal, but
nothing
2011/9/15 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
** Unchanged branches
(...)
stable/*
I'm wondering if we can get rid of them, but i'm not sure about one
thing: are they just a point in our history, i.e.
first commit ... (lots of commits) ...2.x stable release commit
... (lots of commits)
2011/9/15 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
2011/9/15 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
** Unchanged branches
(...)
stable/*
I'm wondering if we can get rid of them, but i'm not sure about one
thing: are they just a point in our history, i.e.
first commit ... (lots of
On 06/09/11 18:38, Graham Percival wrote:
On that note, I wonder if it would be worth standardizing
everything on LILYPOND_GIT instead of $HOME/lilypond-git. There
would be no change to lilydev people, since we'd set that up for
them, so it's just a matter of changing all the scripts+docs
Graham Percival wrote Monday, September 05, 2011 9:39 PM
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_11.html
I'm happy with this proposal, but the origin/dev branches
are not mentioned explicitly. Presumably they remain
unchanged?
Trevor
___
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 10:27:25AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham Percival wrote Monday, September 05, 2011 9:39 PM
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_11.html
I'm happy with this proposal, but the origin/dev branches
are not mentioned explicitly. Presumably they remain
unchanged?
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-devel-bounces+mail=philholmes@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+mail=philholmes@gnu.org]
On Behalf Of Trevor Daniels
Sent: 06 September 2011 10:27
To: Graham Percival; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 11: git
Am Tuesday, 6. September 2011, 15:45:25 schrieb Phil Holmes:
How easy is it to switch between the various git repositories?
It's really simple:
git remote set-url origin [new-URL-comes-here]
Or if you want to keep the old, simply create a new remote:
git remote add newserver
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 02:45:25PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
How easy is it to switch between the various git repositories? Would we
update lilygit, or reserve use of the new repositories for those who had
started to use terminal?
It's not hard for command-line people. We would not update
-Original Message-
From: Graham Percival [mailto:gra...@percival-music.ca]
Sent: 06 September 2011 15:26
To: Phil Holmes
Cc: 'Trevor Daniels'; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 02:45:25PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-devel-bounces+mail=philholmes@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+mail=philholmes@gnu.org]
On Behalf Of Trevor Daniels
Sent: 06 September 2011 10:27
To: Graham Percival; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:45:19PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
Another thought. We've established a standard (that not everyone adopts,
but it's still a standard) that the git repository is locally stored in
lilypond-git with the build being done in lilypond-git/build. Where would
these new
-Original Message-
From: Graham Percival [mailto:gra...@percival-music.ca]
Sent: 06 September 2011 17:49
To: Phil Holmes
Cc: 'Trevor Daniels'; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:45:19PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
Another
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 06:14:57PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
The only kind of person who's interested in those other
repositories will have their own favorite directory layout
anyway (like me; all my source repositories go under
$HOME/src/) so they'd ignore any recommendation anyway.
-Original Message-
From: Graham Percival [mailto:gra...@percival-music.ca]
Sent: 06 September 2011 18:20
To: Phil Holmes
Cc: 'Trevor Daniels'; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 06:14:57PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 06:25:34PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Graham Percival [mailto:gra...@percival-music.ca]
What about just using environment variables, $LILYPOND_GIT
and $LILYPOND_MEDIA_GIT, then telling the user to set up
these variables by
-Original Message-
From: Graham Percival [mailto:gra...@percival-music.ca]
Sent: 06 September 2011 18:38
To: Phil Holmes
Cc: 'Trevor Daniels'; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 06:25:34PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote
Am Dienstag, 6. September 2011, 19:14:57 schrieb Phil Holmes:
-Original Message-
From: Graham Percival [mailto:gra...@percival-music.ca]
The only kind of person who's interested in those other
repositories will have their own favorite directory layout
anyway (like me; all my
Am Dienstag, 6. September 2011, 19:20:05 schrieb Graham Percival:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 06:14:57PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
The only kind of person who's interested in those other
repositories will have their own favorite directory layout
anyway (like me; all my source repositories go
On 9/6/11 11:25 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Graham Percival [mailto:gra...@percival-music.ca]
Sent: 06 September 2011 18:20
To: Phil Holmes
Cc: 'Trevor Daniels'; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories
On Tue, Sep
2011/9/6 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
But your last statement forces a particular location. What if on my system
I have a conflict with that location? I shouldn't be forced to do it.
Currently, I don't use lilypond-git. And I don't do an out-of-tree build
(because it doesn't work for
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 08:17:44PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Am Dienstag, 6. September 2011, 19:20:05 schrieb Graham Percival:
What about just using environment variables, $LILYPOND_GIT and
$LILYPOND_MEDIA_GIT, then telling the user to set up these
variables by themselves?
Janek Warchoł wrote Tuesday, September 06, 2011 8:22 PM
2011/9/6 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
But your last statement forces a particular location. What if on
my system
I have a conflict with that location? I shouldn't be forced to do
it.
Currently, I don't use lilypond-git. And I
2011/9/5 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
** Proposal summary
Our source code hosting is confused: some branches of lilypond
savannah are confusing and should removed, while other parts of
our source code aren’t in a repository at all!
generally LGTM, i only have one question:
**
26 matches
Mail list logo
