Re: RFC: \hideNote

2011-11-02 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 03:35:39PM +, Adam Spiers wrote: Sure, but my point is that if the script updates the autogenerated files, then they should also be included in the patch, right? Ideally included in a separate commit, but using some git magick to tell it to treat both commits as the

Re: RFC: \hideNote

2011-11-02 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 09:35:39AM -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: \hideNote \hideNotes I thought we had settled on \functionOn and \functionOff (e.g., \sustainOn and \sustainOff). So we should have \hideNotesOn and \hideNotesOff, right? Then \hideNote could stand for \once

Re: RFC: \hideNote

2011-11-02 Thread David Kastrup
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes: On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 09:35:39AM -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: \hideNote \hideNotes I thought we had settled on \functionOn and \functionOff (e.g., \sustainOn and \sustainOff). So we should have \hideNotesOn and \hideNotesOff, right?

Re: RFC: \hideNote

2011-11-02 Thread Werner LEMBERG
then I think it would be absolute cruelty to ask a new contributor to attempt the same. Well, yes. The staging problem in connection with merges remains, but I would offer to do the process of making a suitable merge commit with convert-ly. [...] A general question: Usually, my fixes in

Re: RFC: \hideNote

2011-11-02 Thread David Kastrup
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes: then I think it would be absolute cruelty to ask a new contributor to attempt the same. Well, yes. The staging problem in connection with merges remains, but I would offer to do the process of making a suitable merge commit with convert-ly. [...] A

RFC: \hideNote

2011-11-01 Thread Adam Spiers
I noticed that we already have \hideNotes and \unHideNotes, but that is rather clumsy when you only want to hide a single note. So I wrote a patch to add \hideNote, and as a newbie to Lilypond development I wanted to check that this was a sensible idea. The patch is here, although I haven't

Re: RFC: \hideNote

2011-11-01 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi all, I am sure other more experienced programmers will chime in but having two 'similar' functions \hideNote \hideNotes Is a good idea. I thought we had settled on \functionOn and \functionOff (e.g., \sustainOn and \sustainOff). So we should have \hideNotesOn and \hideNotesOff,

Re: RFC: \hideNote

2011-11-01 Thread Peekay Ex
Adam, On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Adam Spiers lilypond-de...@adamspiers.org wrote: On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Adam Spiers lilypond-de...@adamspiers.org wrote: I noticed that we already have \hideNotes and

Re: RFC: \hideNote

2011-11-01 Thread Peekay Ex
Adam, On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Adam Spiers lilypond-de...@adamspiers.org wrote: On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote: I am sure other more experienced programmers will chime in but having two 'similar' functions \hideNote \hideNotes

Re: RFC: \hideNote

2011-11-01 Thread Peekay Ex
Adam, On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Adam Spiers lilypond-de...@adamspiers.org wrote: ... Please feel free to create a new issue to track this. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2002 -- -- James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list

Re: RFC: \hideNote

2011-11-01 Thread Adam Spiers
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Adam Spiers lilypond-de...@adamspiers.org wrote: Thanks James.  I'm a little confused regarding snippets: I was aware that files in Documentation/snippets are autogenerated from files in

Re: RFC: \hideNote

2011-11-01 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
On Nov 1, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Adam Spiers wrote: On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Adam Spiers lilypond-de...@adamspiers.org wrote: On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote: Ah, that

Re: RFC: \hideNote

2011-11-01 Thread David Kastrup
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes: Hi all, I am sure other more experienced programmers will chime in but having two 'similar' functions \hideNote \hideNotes Is a good idea. I thought we had settled on \functionOn and \functionOff (e.g., \sustainOn and

Re: RFC: \hideNote

2011-11-01 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi David, Or we just define \once as a music function doing that and remove it from the parser altogether. Should be slightly less efficient and quite more convenient. I've been wanting that to be true since the very first time I ever used \once… Cheers, Kieren.

Re: RFC: \hideNote

2011-11-01 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 03:39:23PM +, Adam Spiers wrote: Perfect thanks. I'm pretty sure I've *never* seen a better documented F/OSS project. The level of attention to detail is incredible, although as a newbie developer it's a double-edged sword - on the one hand it's comforting to know

Re: RFC: \hideNote

2011-11-01 Thread David Kastrup
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes: Hi David, Or we just define \once as a music function doing that and remove it from the parser altogether. Should be slightly less efficient and quite more convenient. I've been wanting that to be true since the very first time I ever