Re: gs version error in latest GUB build

2019-04-03 Thread Knut Petersen
On 03.04.19 23:23, Valentin Villenave wrote: On 4/3/19, Knut Petersen wrote: An strace log that shows argv and env of execve gs would be helpfull ... Here’s a full strace log from that user, I’m not sure how to find that specific information: http://lilypond-french-users.1298960.n2.nabble.com/

Re: gs version error in latest GUB build

2019-04-03 Thread Valentin Villenave
On 4/3/19, Knut Petersen wrote: > An strace log that shows argv and env of execve gs would be helpfull ... Here’s a full strace log from that user, I’m not sure how to find that specific information: http://lilypond-french-users.1298960.n2.nabble.com/file/t249946/lily_strace.txt Cheers, V.

Re: gs version error in latest GUB build

2019-04-03 Thread Knut Petersen
On 31.03.19 16:17, Valentin Villenave wrote: Greetings, someone on -user-fr has reported gs crashing on some scores (for example the first incipit example from NR 2.9.6), with the following error: gs: Interpreter revision (926) does not match gs_init.ps revision (921). Might be caused by env

Re: gs version error in latest GUB build

2019-04-02 Thread Valentin Villenave
On 4/2/19, Federico Bruni wrote: > As far as I can see from my installations, gs distributed in > lilypond.org recent installers is version 9.26. Nope: $ wget http://lilypond.org/download/binaries/linux-64/lilypond-2.19.83-1.linux-64.sh $ sh lilypond-2.19.83-1.linux-64.sh --tarball $ tar -tjvf

Re: gs version error in latest GUB build

2019-04-02 Thread Federico Bruni
Il giorno dom 31 mar 2019 alle 17:22, Valentin Villenave ha scritto: On 3/31/19, Valentin Villenave wrote: I couldn’t reproduce (but then again I’m not running Ubuntu). I also find it odd that only some scores are reported to fail while other’s aren’t. OK, as I suspected *all* score

Re: gs version error in latest GUB build

2019-03-31 Thread Valentin Villenave
On 3/31/19, Valentin Villenave wrote: > I couldn’t reproduce (but then again I’m not running Ubuntu). I also > find it odd that only some scores are reported to fail while other’s > aren’t. OK, as I suspected *all* scores do indeed fail for this user. Further information just in case: LilyPond 2