On 1/24/11 3:31 PM, "Benkő Pál" wrote:
>>> please advise me about regression tests: can I modify ligatures within
>>> mensural-ligatures.ly? if not, can I add new ones to the same file?
>>
>> Ancient music has been abandoned by developers for a number of years.
>> IMO, you may do whatever you t
On 2011/01/24 21:27:35, benko.pal wrote:
new patchset up.
please advise me about regression tests: can I modify ligatures within
mensural-ligatures.ly? if not, can I add new ones to the same file?
Ancient music has been abandoned by developers for a number of years.
IMO, you may do whatever
>> please advise me about regression tests: can I modify ligatures within
>> mensural-ligatures.ly? if not, can I add new ones to the same file?
>
> Ancient music has been abandoned by developers for a number of years.
> IMO, you may do whatever you think makes the most sense as you try to
> bring
new patchset up.
please advise me about regression tests: can I modify ligatures within
mensural-ligatures.ly? if not, can I add new ones to the same file?
http://codereview.appspot.com/3797046/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
now I see I forgot to answer a question:
> http://codereview.appspot.com/3797046/diff/1/lily/mensural-ligature-engraver.cc#newcode380
> lily/mensural-ligature-engraver.cc:380: {
> Why put the {} in this case?
because variables defined there should not be seen in the default case.
p
hi Carl, thanks for reviewing!
> Let me start by saying I know *nothing* about mensural notation.
>
> The code looks good to me.
>
> I found only one real issue:
>
> LilyPond coding standards for C++ say that if there is only one
> statement in an if clause, we omit {} around that clause.
that's
Let me start by saying I know *nothing* about mensural notation.
The code looks good to me.
I found only one real issue:
LilyPond coding standards for C++ say that if there is only one
statement in an if clause, we omit {} around that clause.
I also had a question (and it probably doesn't matt
Am 07.01.2011 10:17, schrieb Benkő Pál:
>> Sometimes I have been confused by a punctus divisionis placed in the
>> middle above a ligature, but of course that's something different.
>
> wow, I have never seen such a thing! could you give an example?
The only one I could find quickly is from Apel
> if it helps to confirm that you are right, I might add my own experience
> with mensural sources. Composers/writers seem to literally avoid dotted
> notes in ligatures except (a) at the end of the ligature, or (b) on top
> of the first note of an obliqua, or (c) both. (a) and (b) are frequent,
>
Am 06.01.2011 10:56, schrieb Lukas Pietsch:
> On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 10:49 +0100, Benkő Pál wrote:
>
>>> According to Apel (1962: 99), the general rule would seem to be that the dot
>>> should be on the right if it applies to the final note of the whole
>>> ligature, but on top if it is anywhere el
On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 10:49 +0100, Benkő Pál wrote:
> > According to Apel (1962: 99), the general rule would seem to be that the dot
> > should be on the right if it applies to the final note of the whole
> > ligature, but on top if it is anywhere else (flexa or no flexa). He has one
> > example o
> > One thing I forgot to mention: I've also rewritten dot handling within
> > ligatures. The old code
> > - didn't avoid staff lines
> > - didn't conform actual usage: dotting notes above is not a practice,
> > only if they are first within a flexa, see examples in
> > http://anaigeon.free.fr/mes
On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 08:44 +, benko@gmail.com wrote:
> One thing I forgot to mention: I've also rewritten dot handling within
> ligatures. The old code
> - didn't avoid staff lines
> - didn't conform actual usage: dotting notes above is not a practice,
> only if they are first within a f
One thing I forgot to mention: I've also rewritten dot handling within
ligatures. The old code
- didn't avoid staff lines
- didn't conform actual usage: dotting notes above is not a practice,
only if they are first within a flexa, see examples in
http://anaigeon.free.fr/mes_facs/fsbarb.jpg
http:/
Applied (in CVS).
Greetings,
Juergen
On Mon, 9 May 2005, Pal Benko wrote:
What about the remaining durations (maxima, ...) for petrucci style?
I guess, they should be the same as for mensural style?
Yes. These as well are quite close but not identical to those found
in Petrucci prints; they will d
What about the remaining durations (maxima, ...) for petrucci style?
I guess, they should be the same as for mensural style?
Yes. These as well are quite close but not identical to those found
in Petrucci prints; they will do.
p
___
lilypond-devel mailin
Hi Jürgen,
What I do not understand, if you want neo-mensural noteheads, why not just
doing "\override Voice.NoteHead #'style = #'neomensural"?
As far as I can see, the main difference between neomensural and mensural
notehead are (besides the different parameters) that mensural noteheads have
diam
Ok, then I will apply your noteheads as "petrucci" style (hopefully, I
will be able to spend some time this evening). What about the remaining
durations (maxima, ...) for petrucci style? I guess, they should be the
same as for mensural style? Anyway, this can easily be changed in the
find-not
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Pal Benko wrote:
Hi Jürgen,
What I do not understand, if you want neo-mensural noteheads, why not just
doing "\override Voice.NoteHead #'style = #'neomensural"?
As far as I can see, the main difference between neomensural and mensural
notehead are (besides the different paramete
Hi Jürgen,
What I do not understand, if you want neo-mensural noteheads, why not just
doing "\override Voice.NoteHead #'style = #'neomensural"?
As far as I can see, the main difference between neomensural and mensural
notehead are (besides the different parameters) that mensural noteheads have
diam
Hi, Pal!
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Pal Benko wrote:
Hi all,
attached is a patch with changed mensural noteheads.
...
fet_beginchar("Mensural open head","s0mensural")
- draw_diamond_head (staff_space#, 0.15, 0.30, 30, true);
+% draw_diamond_head (1.8 staff_space#, 0.15, 0.40, 30, true);
+
Hi, Benko!
I have finally (sorry for the extremely long delay!) applied your patch,
slightly modified, for using a constant thickness of horizontal lines in
flexa shapes (rather than using the thickness property). I still feel
somewhat uncomfortable with this solution, as the property thickness
Op wo, 20-04-2005 te 22:02 +0200, schreef Pal Benko:
> 2. I'd like to make punctus divisionis work as a new bar symbol,
> \bar ".". But for correct positioning I need in
> Bar_line::compound_barline the previous and the next note - how
> can I get them (if I can at all)?
Unfortunately, this info
Hi Jürgen,
Currently, the thickness property of the flexa shape aplies to all
segments of the outline. IIUC, you are suggesting to apply the
thickness property only to the left and right outline segment of the
flexa shape, while hard-wiring the upper and lower segment wrt to the
proportions in the
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Benkõ Pál wrote:
2005-02-27 Pal Benko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* lily/mensural-ligature.cc (brew_flexa):
make flexa parts of ligatures look more similar to square parts
Hi, Pál!
Currently, the thickness property of the flexa shape aplies to all
segments of the out
Hi, Pál!
I am sorry for responding so late: last week not only I was in bad health,
but also my (quite old) linux installation, which finally broke down, such
that I had to install a new distribution. I am still working on getting
things running again, but I am quite confident that I will be ab
Hi,
I was wondering, could you provide some description for the NEWS file
of what you have changed in the ancient notation in your previous
patch?
White mensural ligatures now conform more closely to renaissance usage
(on the input side maximae are allowed; the output has changed completely).
Ba
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Benkõ Pál wrote:
> ChangeLog:
> 2005-02-15 Pal Benko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * lily/mensural-ligature-engraver.cc:
> * lily/mensural-ligature.cc:
> * lily/include/mensural-ligature.hh: new algorithm implemented
>
> * scm/define-grob-properties.scm
Hi Jürgen,
> > 1. punctus divisionis
>
> Hmmh, I haven't thought about this much by now. Maybe, we want to
> introduce a new type of breath mark; my main source[1] says, that punctus
> divisionis can be thought of something similar like a bar glyph.
([1] is my main source as well.) The main
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Benkõ Pál wrote:
> ChangeLog:
> 2005-02-15 Pal Benko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * lily/mensural-ligature-engraver.cc:
> * lily/mensural-ligature.cc:
> * lily/include/mensural-ligature.hh: new algorithm implemented
>
> * scm/define-grob-properties.scm
30 matches
Mail list logo
