Op wo, 27-04-2005 te 14:31 -0700, schreef Matthias Neeracher:
> An update on this (sorry it took me so long): All three code points are
> supported in many Mac fonts, and all three characters show up fine in
> inkscape and gedit.
> Can you tell me where in the lilypond code the font for the tria
On Apr 15, 2005, at 2:20 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 00:55 -0700, Matthias Neeracher wrote:
[Since we seem to be moving towards a release candidate, I thought
I'd repost this bug report. This is the one issue that currently
keeps my on 2.4.x for my personal needs.]
On MacOS X,
Op ma, 18-04-2005 te 02:13 -0700, schreef Matthias Neeracher:
> > Can you verify that the standard Mac fonts do not cover these
> > codepoints?
>
> They do.
just double checking: Can you see what happens if you import a text
containing said codepoints into inkscape (or any other pango-enabled a
On Apr 15, 2005, at 2:20 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 00:55 -0700, Matthias Neeracher wrote:
[Since we seem to be moving towards a release candidate, I thought
I'd repost this bug report. This is the one issue that currently
keeps my on 2.4.x for my personal needs.]
On MacOS X,
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 00:55 -0700, Matthias Neeracher wrote:
> [Since we seem to be moving towards a release candidate, I thought
> I'd repost this bug report. This is the one issue that currently
> keeps my on 2.4.x for my personal needs.]
>
> On MacOS X, it seems that the symbols for x:maj7
[Since we seem to be moving towards a release candidate, I thought
I'd repost this bug report. This is the one issue that currently
keeps my on 2.4.x for my personal needs.]
On MacOS X, it seems that the symbols for x:maj7 and x:m7.5- still
don't work properly in 2.5.19 (The former is omitte
