This needs an update to be applied.
Cheers,
Bertrand
http://codereview.appspot.com/4813048/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 2011/07/26 06:14:47, mike_apollinemike.com wrote:
On Jul 26, 2011, at 5:01 AM, mailto:hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
> regtest missing.
>
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4813048/diff/3001/lily/slur-scoring.cc
> File lily/slur-scoring.cc (right):
>
>
http://codereview.appspot.com/4813048/diff/
On Jul 26, 2011, at 5:01 AM, hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
> regtest missing.
>
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4813048/diff/3001/lily/slur-scoring.cc
> File lily/slur-scoring.cc (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4813048/diff/3001/lily/slur-scoring.cc#newcode286
> lily/slur-scoring.cc:286
regtest missing.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4813048/diff/3001/lily/slur-scoring.cc
File lily/slur-scoring.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4813048/diff/3001/lily/slur-scoring.cc#newcode286
lily/slur-scoring.cc:286: end_ys[d] += additional_ys + 0.5; // 0.5 =
m4g1c padding over extra
On 2011/07/24 14:43:16, MikeSol wrote:
Please don't run regtests yet on this patch - it is up to see if
people are OK
with this approach. It is a brute-force approach that will slow down
lilypond
for slurs that have extra-object-collisions, but I think it'll cover
the grand
majority of cas
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Please don't run regtests yet on this patch - it is up to see if people
are OK with this approach. It is a brute-force approach that will slow
down lilypond for slurs that have extra-object-collisions, but I think
it'll cover the grand majority of cases.
Description:
Sketc
