On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 16:51:56 +, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> Given that make will not do anything if the source tree has not been changed,
> I see no problem (and plenty of benefit) in having make check do the
> equivalent of make && make check.
>
> Personally, however, I prefer to do
>
>
Given that make will not do anything if the source tree has not been changed, I
see no problem (and plenty of benefit) in having make check do the equivalent
of make && make check.
Personally, however, I prefer to do
make
make check
rather than
make && make check
because I want to see my
Begin forwarded message:
>
> Subject: [testlilyissues:issues] Re: #5564 Fix conversion warnings in beaming
> code
> Date: October 10, 2019 at 12:08:48 EDT
> I'm sorry to contribute to your frustration. I can see what the process is,
> but my question (which I direct to LilyPond developers in
