2012/1/24 Graham Percival :
> Our published materials says "24 hours":
>
> [...] we should update that accordingly.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5575047/ and stop worrying.
:)
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:27:56PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
> >Of course, a 96-hour reponse rate isn't precisely fantastic, but
> >it's a start.
>
> Well - TBH time isn't of the essence as a general rule. Whether a
> bug gets added to the tracker in one day or 3 rarely affects the
> overall deve
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Janek Warchoł"
Cc: ; "lilypond-user"
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 11:57 AM
Subject: user vs. user (was: User vs Developer: Round 2 (and
half-time?)(was: Re: music font)
Let's take a look
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 01:50:13AM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>
> 2012/1/23 Xavier Scheuer :
> > why I never *demand*
> > developers to fix an issue, even if it is one that is really annoying
> > my ego in almost every score I typeset.
>
> One thing comes to my mind: you are talking about bugs t
Dear Xavier,
hereby i'd like to thank you for your time spent on helping LilyPond!
It's true that user's work often is not appreciated enough.
2012/1/23 Xavier Scheuer :
> Dear Graham, dear Developers,
> why I never *demand*
> developers to fix an issue, even if it is one that is really annoying
This is a split reply from the thread "music font".
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2012-01/msg00752.html
The title is a reference to the fist "Users versus developers" flame war
of which I appear to be also at the origin.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-05/msg
