Am Dienstag, 31. März 2009 schrieb John Mandereau:
> Graham Percival a écrit :
> > On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:57:06AM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> >> - -) git fetch + git rebase will take that local commit and append it
> >> after
> >> the HEAD of current master, so it will be
> >>yourc
Graham Percival a écrit :
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:57:06AM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
- -) git fetch + git rebase will take that local commit and append it
after
the HEAD of current master, so it will be
yourcommit (=new local master)
|
current_remote_head
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:21:49AM +, Daniel Hulme wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 09:06:22PM +0800, Graham Percival wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 07:08:40PM +0100, James E. Bailey wrote:
> > >
> > > GIT from git.sv.gnu.org
> > > git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/lilypond.git
> >
> > T
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:57:06AM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> On Samstag, 28. März 2009 10:48:16 Graham Percival wrote:
> > I'm confused. To update git (assuming I'm in the top-level
> > directory), do I need:
> > git fetch
> > git rebase origin/master
> > or
> > git pull
> > ?
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Samstag, 28. März 2009 10:48:16 Graham Percival wrote:
> I'm confused. To update git (assuming I'm in the top-level
> directory), do I need:
> git fetch
> git rebase origin/master
> or
> git pull
> ?
Both work. There is one difference, thoug
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 04:33:56PM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> cd lilypond
> git checkout mybranch (unless you are already there)
> git fetch
> git rebase origin/master
> git format-patch origin/master
>
>
> > I'm still amazed at git. Simple things should be simple.
>
> git pull
> git ad
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Freitag, 27. März 2009 schrieb Graham Percival:
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 02:31:21PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> > Let's say remote master has changed in the meantime, and you
Graham Percival wrote Friday, March 27, 2009 2:11 PM
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 07:56:53AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 3/27/09 7:24 AM, "Jan Nieuwenhuizen"
wrote:
> Well, this is utterly ridiculous IMNSHO. I would suggest to
>
> * fix the main lilypond repo so that git clone "just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 27. März 2009 schrieb Graham Percival:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 02:31:21PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > Let's say remote master has changed in the meantime, and you want to
> > create a new patch rebased on current master:
> >
> > cd
Op vrijdag 27-03-2009 om 22:11 uur [tijdzone +0800], schreef Graham
Percival:
> Now, according to Patrick, "git clone" works for the main branch.
That's my experience, at least with git 1.6.
> Another question is whether it makes sense to keep web/ as a
> branch in the main lilypond git. I mean
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 02:31:21PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> Let's say remote master has changed in the meantime, and you want to
> create a new patch rebased on current master:
>
> cd lilypond
> git checkout master
> git pull
> git checkout mybranch
> git rebase master
> git format-patch ma
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 07:56:53AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 3/27/09 7:24 AM, "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" wrote:
>
> > Well, this is utterly ridiculous IMNSHO. I would suggest to
> >
> > * fix the main lilypond repo so that git clone "just works", or
> > * ask on g...@vger.kernel.org w
On 3/27/09 7:24 AM, "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" wrote:
> Op donderdag 26-03-2009 om 21:06 uur [tijdzone +0800], schreef Graham
> Percival:
>
>>> GIT from git.sv.gnu.org
>>> git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/lilypond.git
>>
>> This does not set up easy pulling or pushing in the future, and
>> genera
Op donderdag 26-03-2009 om 21:06 uur [tijdzone +0800], schreef Graham
Percival:
> > GIT from git.sv.gnu.org
> > git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/lilypond.git
>
> This does not set up easy pulling or pushing in the future, and
> generally assumes that people know how to use git
> > To get the m
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:06 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 07:08:40PM +0100, James E. Bailey wrote:
>>
>> GIT from git.sv.gnu.org
>> git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/lilypond.git
>
> This does not set up easy pulling or pushing in the future, and
> generally assumes that p
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 07:08:40PM +0100, James E. Bailey wrote:
>
> GIT from git.sv.gnu.org
> git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/lilypond.git
This does not set up easy pulling or pushing in the future, and
generally assumes that people know how to use git. It also
downloads all branches, which
Am 25.03.2009 um 14:54 schrieb John Mandereau:
James E. Bailey a écrit :
Am 25.03.2009 um 14:41 schrieb Graham Percival:
Nothing; they come from exactly the same source. The version in
the AU is going to die soon, where "soon" means "within 4 months".
So then why the difference? I should
James E. Bailey a écrit :
Am 25.03.2009 um 14:41 schrieb Graham Percival:
Nothing; they come from exactly the same source. The version in
the AU is going to die soon, where "soon" means "within 4 months".
So then why the difference? I should think a one line command to get
the source is eas
Am 25.03.2009 um 14:41 schrieb Graham Percival:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 02:37:10PM +0100, James E. Bailey wrote:
Although apropos of nothing, what's the difference between the
instructions in the AU (and on the web-site) on getting the
source code, and the instructions in the CG?
Nothing; th
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 02:37:10PM +0100, James E. Bailey wrote:
> Although apropos of nothing, what's the difference between the
> instructions in the AU (and on the web-site) on getting the
> source code, and the instructions in the CG?
Nothing; they come from exactly the same source. The versi
Am 25.03.2009 um 12:50 schrieb John Mandereau:
James E. Bailey a écrit :
I'm having a configure error, and I don't know how to solve it. I
get this:
ERROR: Please install required programs: /Users/lilydev/bin/
fontforge >= 20050624 (installed: .fontforge 20080927)
What does 'which fontfo
James E. Bailey a écrit :
I'm having a configure error, and I don't know how to solve it. I get
this:
ERROR: Please install required programs: /Users/lilydev/bin/fontforge
>= 20050624 (installed: .fontforge 20080927)
What does 'which fontforge' and '`which fontforge` --version' say?
Could yo
I'm having a configure error, and I don't know how to solve it. I get
this:
ERROR: Please install required programs: /Users/lilydev/bin/
fontforge >= 20050624 (installed: .fontforge 20080927)
See INSTALL.txt for more information on how to build LilyPond
The version of fontforge installed i
23 matches
Mail list logo
