Am Dienstag, den 28.04.2020, 17:58 -0400 schrieb Dan Eble:
> On Apr 23, 2020, at 16:24, Jonas Hahnfeld <
> hah...@hahnjo.de
> > wrote:
> > > I'd prefer file-names and thumbnails, unfolded by clicking.
> > >
> > > Is this behaviour adjustable?
> >
> > No, I'm merely linking the uploaded file (GitL
On 21/04/2020 18:54, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
Okay, so let me try to briefly summarize the expressed opinions on the
list so far (correct me if I got something wrong or missed a point):
Han-Wen is in favor of Gerrit; David leans towards GitLab; Federico and
me are in favor of GitLab; Werner is fine
On Apr 23, 2020, at 16:24, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
>> I'd prefer file-names and thumbnails, unfolded by clicking.
>>
>> Is this behaviour adjustable?
>
> No, I'm merely linking the uploaded file (GitLab decides to display the
> image inline) and AFAICS there are no options to influence this
> beha
Am Donnerstag, den 23.04.2020, 22:04 +0200 schrieb Thomas Morley:
> Am Mi., 22. Apr. 2020 um 12:50 Uhr schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld :
> > I've run the migration script last night (~9h) and will now do some
> > post-processing. I'll keep all of you posted once we can start.
> >
> > Jonas
>
> Hi Jonas,
>
Am Mi., 22. Apr. 2020 um 12:50 Uhr schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld :
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 22.04.2020, 10:31 +0100 schrieb James Lowe:
> > On 21/04/2020 18:54, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, den 15.04.2020, 21:15 +0200 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
> > > > With 2.21.0 done, I'd like to restart discussion
Am Donnerstag, den 23.04.2020, 17:03 + schrieb Carl Sorensen:
> Sending it only to you was not intended. I must have hit reply instead of
> reply-all, and I didn't notice it. I'm sorry!
>
> I guess I'm being lazy right now. I don't have a good lilypond development
> environment set up rig
Sending it only to you was not intended. I must have hit reply instead of
reply-all, and I didn't notice it. I'm sorry!
I guess I'm being lazy right now. I don't have a good lilypond development
environment set up right now, so I don't have any merge requests to send. I
guess I could just c
Am Mittwoch, den 22.04.2020, 10:31 +0100 schrieb James Lowe:
> On 21/04/2020 18:54, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 15.04.2020, 21:15 +0200 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
> > > With 2.21.0 done, I'd like to restart discussion about switching our
> > > development platform. To recall, we had pro
On 21/04/2020 18:54, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 15.04.2020, 21:15 +0200 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
With 2.21.0 done, I'd like to restart discussion about switching our
development platform. To recall, we had proposals about using Gerrit
[1] (don't miss follow-ups in March [2]) and GitLa
Il giorno mar 21 apr 2020 alle 19:54, Jonas Hahnfeld
ha scritto:
Given that I would like to propose that we carry a trial of
gitlab.com.
I would have liked this to happen in the https://gitlab.com/lilypond
group, but I haven't heard back from Janek on granting access. So I
guess I will prune t
Am Mittwoch, den 15.04.2020, 21:15 +0200 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
> With 2.21.0 done, I'd like to restart discussion about switching our
> development platform. To recall, we had proposals about using Gerrit
> [1] (don't miss follow-ups in March [2]) and GitLab / gitlab.com [3].
>
> [...]
>
> To c
Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
> Am Mittwoch, den 15.04.2020, 21:15 +0200 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
>> With 2.21.0 done, I'd like to restart discussion about switching our
>> development platform. To recall, we had proposals about using Gerrit
>> [1] (don't miss follow-ups in March [2]) and GitLab / gitlab
Am Mittwoch, den 15.04.2020, 21:15 +0200 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
> With 2.21.0 done, I'd like to restart discussion about switching our
> development platform. To recall, we had proposals about using Gerrit
> [1] (don't miss follow-ups in March [2]) and GitLab / gitlab.com [3].
>
> [...]
>
> To c
I am in favour of Gitlab.
I'm not a developer. Sometimes I contributed doc or website fixes.
My (main) work of translator won't be affected at all by this decision.
What I care most is the replacement of Sourceforge with something
better.
If choosing Gerrit means keeping Sourceforge, I would se
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 9:15 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> With 2.21.0 done, I'd like to restart discussion about switching our
> development platform. To recall, we had proposals about using Gerrit
> [1] (don't miss follow-ups in March [2]) and GitLab / gitlab.com [3].
>
> Simultaneously the FSF has
> What would fit our use case in GitLab + CI pretty nicely are Merge
> Trains [1].
Interesting, and very nice! This looks like a very useful feature
indeed.
> Basically this has the potential to replace our current setup of
> patchy-staging: Once a patch counted down, we press "Start merge
>
Am Donnerstag, den 16.04.2020, 10:44 +0200 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
> > To conclude, I believe we should choose one of Gerrit and GitLab and
> > have a trial to see if the processes can be carried over.
>
> I'm fine with both. If in doubt please select the one that is easier
> to manage, and which
> To conclude, I believe we should choose one of Gerrit and GitLab and
> have a trial to see if the processes can be carried over.
I'm fine with both. If in doubt please select the one that is easier
to manage, and which provides good support for CI and things like
this.
Werner
Hello,
On 15/04/2020 23:08, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 9:44 PM David Kastrup wrote:
To conclude, I believe we should choose one of Gerrit and GitLab and
have a trial to see if the processes can be carried over. (If not, we
can still give the other platform a try.)
IIRC, G
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 9:44 PM David Kastrup wrote:
> > To conclude, I believe we should choose one of Gerrit and GitLab and
> > have a trial to see if the processes can be carried over. (If not, we
> > can still give the other platform a try.)
>
> IIRC, Gerrit was not really tracking issues and
On Apr 15, 2020, at 15:44, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
>
>> To conclude, I believe we should choose one of Gerrit and GitLab and
>> have a trial to see if the processes can be carried over. (If not, we
>> can still give the other platform a try.)
>
> IIRC, Gerrit was not re
Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
> With 2.21.0 done, I'd like to restart discussion about switching our
> development platform. To recall, we had proposals about using Gerrit
> [1] (don't miss follow-ups in March [2]) and GitLab / gitlab.com [3].
>
> Simultaneously the FSF has evaluated different Forge sol
With 2.21.0 done, I'd like to restart discussion about switching our
development platform. To recall, we had proposals about using Gerrit
[1] (don't miss follow-ups in March [2]) and GitLab / gitlab.com [3].
Simultaneously the FSF has evaluated different Forge solutions [4],
basically focusing on
23 matches
Mail list logo
