p://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/running-_002e_002fautogen_002esh
Shout if you still get compile errors.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Morley"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "lilypond-devel"
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 12:49 PM
Subject: Re: error with make test-base-line
2012/7/15 Phil Holmes :
(...)
When you're starting from scratch with a build, it
make test-redo,
make check and fixing the occuring errors step by step.
Currently the regtest comparison returned some strange results (at
least for me).
Attached is a detail of it.
What does it means?
-Harm
It's supposed to track something like memory usage. These changes are
almost
Could someone have a look at http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=190 and say
what's wrong with it, please?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Morley"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "lilypond-devel"
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: Strange regtest-comparison
2012/7/15 Thomas Morley :
2012/7/15 Phil Holmes :
- Original Message - From: "
through. However, it will be tomorrow at the earliest before I set myself
up to do this. Is that OK with you?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
imi.it/LSR/Item?id=3. Doesn't work and doesn't add
anything over documentation of override Beam #'neutral-direction.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2662 refers.
Unless there's dissent, both will be deleted on Wednesday 17th, 17
- Original Message -
From: "Neil Puttock"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel" ; "LilyPond User Group"
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 10:26 PM
Subject: Re: Odd snippet
On 15 July 2012 22:22, Phil Holmes wrote:
Could someone have a look at http://l
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor Daniels"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "Devel"
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: Snippet deletion countdown
Phil Holmes wrote Monday, July 16, 2012 4:09 PM
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=190. Even with t
x27;s not actually how I thought it
worked, but they don't. So there's no _need_ to convert invalid to
verified. Wonder whether google have changed their code?
Apart from that, I can see some justification for changing invalid to
verified, as an
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "Devel"
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 4:09 PM
Subject: Snippet deletion countdown
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=190. Even with the segno not being
shifted off the left of the page, I don't understand what thi
n new
take priority in the build from snippets in snippets is a good suggestion.
I do think it would be better to hold off for a bit - as I said, let the new
system shake down a bit.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
ncy, I've got used to reading the
commands the other way mentally as the docs go to great lengths to
index then all under '\'.
Nice catch for arbument, David,
Cheers,
Ian
Not exactly:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=855
--
Phil Holmes
__
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Hulin"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18/07/12 14:54, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Origina
hed this about 30 seconds before your comments. TBH I think the best
way of working is to put a patch up for comment, but push if you want -
we're going to be the only people running the script, so we can keep
updating and correcting it. Please feel free to add the functionality
you
e out of the same quota as the project total? :(
So all we need to do is uuencode the files and use them in source or
tracking.
;-)
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
at would take a
while, though, so I' prefer only to do it if all else failed.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
akelsr and seems a
more sensible way of creating these files.
The second puts the correct tags in the files in snippets/new. There were a
number of errors.
I need to get both of these into master to do final checks on my "black
bars" patch before pushing th
but please test it".
If someone can let me know how I should update my GUB installation, I'll run
a build on it as soon as I've tried the update. I think this would work
best with this patch on a branch on git so I can build GUB from that branch.
--
Phil Holmes
_
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: ; ; ;
;
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: Fix Issue 2146 "Illegal entry in bfrange block in
ToUnicodeCMap" (issue 6399046)
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 05:41:05PM +0100,
--
David Kastrup
I've run patchy staging a number of times, mostly selfishly to get patches
into master to allow further work. I'd be happy to run it more often.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https:/
\inStaffSegno" (without 'ndex') until "@end
lilypond" (and an empty spacer line) should be inserted.
It was in the patch you provided on the web site. I've corrected this and
applied the other comments and pushed the patch. Tranche 2 next...
--
Phil Holmes
__
umentation/contributor/syntax-survey#indexing
And the answer would appear to be "yes".
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
, if they need to
recreate it, the just download that version.
@GP - I know this isn't what the question is about, but is there no way of
rolling back to a version of Lily which will compile your files?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel m
I get the patch fails to apply - presumably because music-functions.scm has
been updated twice since the patch was created? Does this mean it needs
rebasing, or somesuch?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: David Nalesnik
To: Lilypond Dev
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012
I'd like to look at fixing 766. Could someone suggest the best way to go
about this, please? One option would seem to be to calculate the length of
the text of the instrument names, and set the indent on the score equal to
that plus a bit. Is this the best way? It seems to me that a system base
ember). Is there a way of
getting a formatted patch?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: David Nalesnik
To: David Kastrup
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: push patch for issue 2679
OK, I succeeded in doing this and upl
Pushed as f7085cf9b2ff111b7d30c8a59e367c771a7e3c52. Patchy is now running.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: David Nalesnik
To: Graham Percival
Cc: Phil Holmes ; David Kastrup ; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: push patch
BTW - apologies for top-posting and that, but my Windows email system takes
your mails as HTML and does this with them.
Anyway - you're now in master.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: David Nalesnik
To: Phil Holmes
Cc: Graham Percival ; David Kastrup ; lil
t. Given that each quoted string has a space between, is it OK to
simply delete the trailing whitespace here?
http://codereview.appspot.com/6422061/
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
is message:
WARNING: could not change issue labels;
please email lilypond-devel with the issue number: 2401
Frédéric
Looks like it has successfully updated 2401 on the tracker.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Frédéric Bron" ;
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: Issue 2401 in lilypond: NR 1.2.4 - Not working snippet
Nope, it only has a comment but no labels. That means that
t see any reason why patchy ran and failed, unless it's because I
started my patchy later and finished earlier and pushed staging to master.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailma
Phil Holmes wrote Tuesday, July 24, 2012 4:28 PM
I'd like to look at fixing 766. Could someone suggest the best way to go
about this, please? One option would seem to be to calculate the length of
the text of the instrument names, and set the indent on the score equal to
that plus a bi
owever, it does appear just fine.
Anybody has an idea what's wrong here?
Search me. A limit of 725 open issues???
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: What's wrong with issue 2696?
am I now a persona non grata?
Who said that?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailin
before it gets activated, so I have to be patient
...
I think it would probably be more accurate to say "may take some time". I
believe that every time I've done it, it's been instant. Try a dry run
push, and if that works, you're good to go.
--
Phil Holmes
__
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Keith OHara"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 12:48 PM
Subject: Re: Instrument names
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 02:32:42AM +, Keith OHara wrote:
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
> So it would be ea
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "Graham Percival" ; "Keith OHara"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 2:41 PM
Subject: Re: Instrument names
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Keith O
- Original Message -
From: "Keith OHara"
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 3:32 AM
Subject: Re: Instrument names
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
I've done the looking into the code that I can manage. I know that
indents
are worked in output-def.cc:line_dim
line::print grob):
/media/IntelSSD/patchybuild/autobuild/build/out/lybook-db/d5/lily-520248d0.ly:59:9:
Unbound variable: ly:bar-line::print
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Marc Hohl"
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2012 7:07 PM
Subject: Re: Email from Phil's patchy
Am 28.07.2012 19:43, schrieb Marc Hohl:
Am 28.07.2012 15:27, schrieb David Kastrup:
"Phil Holmes" writes:
Ok, I'll be back
size?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
tion of the variable, and works for me.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Bernard Hurley"
Cc: "Phil Holmes" ; ;
; ;
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 12:12 AM
Subject: Re: Set indent based on instrument name (issue 6457049)
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:44:28PM +0100, Bernard
onfused by this. AFAICS there's nothing in staging and therefore
nothing for patchy to do. Wonder whether it's local repo got confused by an
old non-compiling patch?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
age saying 'Loading...'
Are we aware that make test doesn't create a usable document from which to
view the output, or is it just an oddity of my system?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: Set indent based on instrument name (issue 6457049)
"Phil Holmes" writes:
I'd be happy to change it if someone could suggest an improvement.
When I initiall
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: Set indent based on instrument name (issue 6457049)
"Phil Holmes" writes:
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July
can't
possibly read every email. The lengths need to be reset whenever there is a
new score block.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
t, or re-initialise it whenever a new score is created.
I'll have a go at working out how to do that, but I don't even understand
how to access contexts from c++, so it seems like it would be a continuing
number of days of poring over the code to find out.
Any pointers (pun not inten
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: Set indent based on instrument name (issue 6457049)
"Phil Holmes" writes:
I can't actually help here since either problem descrip
" option - I
don't want to ftp megs of files from home whenever I run patchy...
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 4:48 PM
Subject: Re: Problems with make test
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:22:25AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
So I open collated-files.html, to fi
e, if it fails in being moved to
master, you'd need to change that...
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
COUNT=X for the
make test suite. On my multi-core system, make test-baseline and make
test-redo are 3 times faster with the multi-cores in action.
Back to PNGs and EPSs.
Oh. And - Go Wiggo :-)
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
rated
with the flag present.
That said, Graham was right and this does break regtest comparison, but not
in a way that I currently understand. This is true even with
formats=png,ps. I'm currently looking at what's going on and will certainly
not propose anything else unless make check
se?) - also I will be glad to discuss my experience in using lilypond
in a "musicological" friendly way.
ciao
Rodolfo
Build is mainly done with make. There are also a number of python scripts
thrown in.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel ma
The output from my pixel comparator is here:
http://www.philholmes.net/lilypond/regtestresults/2.15.42/
There are a number of significant changes, and 2 or 3 possible regressions.
Please look and check.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: 2.15.42 regtests
"Phil Holmes" writes:
The output from my pixel comparator is here:
http://www.philholmes.net/lilypond/regtestresults/2.15.42/
There are a n
/html/lilypond-devel/2011-11/msg00360.html
I'd be happy to test once I know what it does a bit better.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Keith OHara"
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2012 8:01 AM
Subject: Re: 2.15.42 regtests
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
There are a number of significant changes, and 2 or 3 possible
regressions.
Please look and check.
Almost all
- Original Message -
From: "John Mandereau"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Lily devel"
Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2012 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: PATCHES: Brain surgery on the build system, first stage
Hi Phil,
Le samedi 04 août 2012 à 14:02 +0100, Phil Holmes a éc
- Original Message -
From: "John Mandereau"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Lily devel"
Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2012 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: PATCHES: Brain surgery on the build system, first stage
Hi Phil,
Le samedi 04 août 2012 à 14:02 +0100, Phil Holmes a éc
he
patch. Could you see whether you can fix this?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "ArnoldTheresius"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: A series of gitdiff patches from offline development
ArnoldTheresius wrote:
Phil Holmes-2 wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "ArnoldTheresius"
e pushing if you remember
http://codereview.appspot.com/6422061/
I didn't trim the whitespace because I wasn't sure of the effect in a list
like this. Will it definitely have no effect?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
e of the
original and changed file, and then makes a "ghost" version of the change to
overlay on the original. Does this seem correct. Worth documenting?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
ouching a
staff line. And why are they horizontal?
Good points. It looks like a bug in autochanged beaming.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
This would require a
new mailing list to avoid the problems above. We could then add an issue
per regtest, and only people who want to subscribe would need to subscribe
to the list.
I think the final suggestion is my favoured one.
--
Phil Holmes
__
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: Regtest rating project
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 12:27:40PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
We're getting to the time where
ural signs _do_
collide. See highly magnified PDF screengrab (attached).
--
Phil Holmes
<>___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
iption, to tell whether the regtest
has been passed?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
t seemed to me to be
a red herring.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
a bug.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
specific aspect of functionality, and where
inspection of the output shows that functionality is working.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
know why the
slur shapes keep changing; ditto the time sig position (and more importantly
for this) and which is correct?
--
Phil Holmes
<><><><>___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
anyway - I couldn't find a way to exercise it directly on
my Windows box, so I would be surprised if any windows users actually have
this problem. If it's anyone, I'd guess it could be Trevor, so would
appreciate his testing this. However, as I say above, I'd be surprised
google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1933
?
http://codereview.appspot.com/6471043/
See my reply to Reinhold, but I think it's likely the other way round.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.
The main reason I started to edit this is because it had the construct:
if (x)
{
if (x)
{
}
}
which doesn't seem too good. Whilst trying to work out what that was doing,
I concluded the relocate bit couldn't do anything either, since no-one would
k
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: ; ;
; ;
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: Removes popen3 deprecated warning (issue 6471043)
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 03:31:06PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
My understanding
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "Graham Percival"
Cc: ; ;
; ;
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: Removes popen3 deprecated warning (issue 6471043)
So we have fixed it. You want I should find out when?
Between 2.15.18 and 2.1
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "Graham Percival"
Cc: ; ;
; ;
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: Removes popen3 deprecated warning (issue 6471043)
- Original Message -
From: "Phil
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: ; ; ;
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: Tidies binary relocation (issue 6463066)
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 03:40:19PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message --
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor Daniels"
To: "Graham Percival" ; "Phil Holmes"
Cc: ; ;
;
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: Removes popen3 deprecated warning (issue 6471043)
Graham Percival wrote Saturday, August 18, 2012 7:34
ing
maybe somebody pushed a commit directly to master?
Uh.
commit a23befd66195ef6a83c1f99926597a83bd967e94
Author: Phil Holmes
Date: Mon Jul 23 15:16:52 2012 +0100
Updates snippets for cross-staff-stems
That's more than a month old. Could it be that your patchy is a bit
behind the t
Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: Patchy email from PhilH
"Phil Holmes" writes:
I'd not run it for a while, so yes. This was a result of my build
machine turnin
e why, but that implies a retest and review before
it's ready to push.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Up until 2.15.27 http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=654 runs OK.
Afterwards it seems to loop infinitely. I've tried convert-ly and it left
the snippet unchanged. Could someone who understands what it's doing check
whether a lily syntax change is needed, or is it revealing a bug?
- Original Message -
From: "Gilles"
To: "Devel" ; "Phil Holmes"
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 10:17 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with snippet 654 after 2.15.28
Le Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:05:18 +0200, Phil Holmes a
écrit:
> Up until 2.15.27 http://lsr.dsi
build relies on Python, and it also
creates a shipping Python by a mechanism I don't believe anyone currently
understands. Is there a good reason to want to?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
r of tools you might investigate which provide this kind of
functionality:
http://lilypond.org/easier-editing.html
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
system. When this was discussed in Feb this year, it was decided to go with
"empty" directories rather than hacking the build system to avoid the
warning. Could you restore these directories, please?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel ma
27;t disable it in all cases. lilypond-book is called many times in a
doc build (e.g. for regtests). This only disables it for the build of the
manuals.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "John Mandereau"
To: "David Kastrup" ; "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Lily devel"
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: Brain surgery on the make system
Hi Phil,
I hoped that missing directories would be supported
- Original Message -
From: "John Mandereau"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Lily devel"
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: Reduces langdefs.py warnings in doc build (issue 6487046)
2012/8/27 Phil Holmes :
- Original Message - From:
Anyone object if I push a patch that adds -q to the call to bib2texi direct
to staging? I've tested it and make doc runs fine - it gets rid of some
clutter in the output of make doc.
--
Phil Holmes
0002-Quietens-bibtex-in-make-doc.patch
Description: Binary
- Original Message -
From: "John Mandereau"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Lily devel"
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: Reduces langdefs.py warnings in doc build (issue 6487046)
2012/8/27 Phil Holmes :
- Original Message - From:
t everyone looks like geeks. There are 3 exceptions.
Is it compulsory to have a pony tail?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: ; "David Kastrup"
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: The currently still assembled part of the team in Waltrop
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:07:40PM +0100, Phil Holmes wr
301 - 400 of 2094 matches
Mail list logo