I have three questions about the trill extender.
In the example below I have set the #'edge-height = #'(4 . 0) in order
to show the vertical dash that appears at the beginning of the trill
extender. If I put a non-zero value in the other position I get a
similar vertical dash at the ending point
The tagline as well as all other titling information is typeset
by LaTeX. In LaTeX, you get a new line by typing \\, however, in the
LilyPond input, you have to replace each \ with \\, so you should
try something like
tagline = First line second line
/Mats
KEVIN ZEMBOWER wrote:
I'm trying
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As described in a previous e-mail, I have a helluva large cadenza
printed for solo violin. It is unmeasured, and it probably has a length
only calculatable using 32nd notes. If I want to start tutti playing
back up after the cadenza, what do I do? Include s(x)*32
It should certainly work if you add
\usepackage{times}
and call dvips with the flag -Ppdf.
For the option with cm-super, I have never used it myself, since
we purchased the corresponding Type1 fonts from Micropress before
cm-super was available, but I would be surprised if that alternative
didn't
A tie can only occur between two notes in the same voice, which
in the world of LilyPond means that they have to live in the
same Voice context. Either you could include the full \repeat
and \alternative within one of the {...} \\ {...} voices
(actually you want at least the \repeat to appear in
See http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/info-lilypond/2004-03/msg00014.html
/Mats
Zbynìk Burget wrote:
Hi,
I've one small question - when will be Development branch of Lilypond
(2.1.x) marked as stable? (assumption)
What is necessary finish up before marking of Lilypond branch 2.1.x as
stable?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello all,
I'm very new to Lilypond but have almost finished engraving my first
score. I have run into one problem that I cannot figure out. In the
space of one measure of a piano score, I need to notate a cluster that
goes from way down in the bass clef to
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 9:36 am, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Now that I look more carefully at the output you sent earlier,
it looks as if you try to set the header field 'pagenumber'
in your file. Is that right?
Yes, in fact here's the header:
\header {
title = Four Brief Statements
Your message with Subject: Re: Your website
could not be delivered to the following recipients:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please do not resend your original message.
Delivery attempts will continue to be made for 2 day(s).
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
As you can find in the manual (section Invoking lilypond), the
only possible values for this field are no or a positive number.
This is why your file fails. Just leave out that field if you want
normal page numbering.
/Mats
Lyle Raymond wrote:
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 9:36 am, Mats Bengtsson
At least in 2.1.34, it certainly splits into several lines, however
I'm afraid that raggedright doesn't do exactly what you expect,
especially it's not similar to what you get with \raggedright in
LaTeX.
What LilyPond does with this option, is that it breaks the lines at
the same places as it
If you search the mailing list archives, you will, for example,
find
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2003-10/msg00244.html
and if you search the Regression test document on the documentation
web site, you will find
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 9:36 am, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Now that I look more carefully at the output you sent earlier,
it looks as if you try to set the header field 'pagenumber'
in your file. Is that right?
I just discovered that the pagenumber field was the culprit. Thanks for your
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 9:36 am, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Now that I look more carefully at the output you sent earlier,
it looks as if you try to set the header field 'pagenumber'
in your file. Is that right?
I just discovered that the pagenumber field was the culprit. Thanks for your
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 11:54, Lyle Raymond wrote:
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 9:36 am, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Now that I look more carefully at the output you sent earlier,
it looks as if you try to set the header field 'pagenumber'
in your file. Is that right?
I just discovered that
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 11:40:59PM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
So you want to have subdivideBeams, but with subdivisions on 8th
notes?
Yes. (For some unknown reasons, I didn't even see that there's a property
subdivisions)
Ciao,
Kili
___
Hello,
I'm trying to generate LaTeX output from a .ly file. As far as I could
understand I'm supposed to use lilypond-book. This is the output I get:
$ lilypond-book -f latex appassionata.ly
lilypond-book (GNU LilyPond) 2.1.30
Reading appassionata.ly...
Dissecting...
Traceback (most recent
I've been experimenting with some things to try to deal with a
percussion problem.
I want to change between melodic percussion (those which produce
definite pitch e.g. vibrapbone, tympani, marimba, etc.) and non melodic
percussion (temple blocks, congas, tam-tam etc.)
I want to keep this on a
hi all,
I have some old music ly files with notes written in absolute mode. But I like
\relative better. Does anyone know if there exists a tool that can convert
notes from absolute to relative mode?
Erik
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL
Hello, Han-Wen:
Does anyone want to take on this task? It would be
very similar to existing code, so it is relatively easy.
I might be interested -- this could be a great way for me to ease into
the contributor pool -- but I have a couple of questions:
1. Would this particular code be in C(++)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello, Han-Wen:
Does anyone want to take on this task? It would be
very similar to existing code, so it is relatively easy.
I might be interested -- this could be a great way for me to ease into
the contributor pool -- but I have a couple of questions:
1.
Hello,
until now I used lilypond version 2.1.28 and it works fine. :)
Now I've installed successfully lilypond version 2.1.34, and there is a
problem with convert-ly:
The command
convert-ly -e --from=2.1.28 op-9.2.ly
creates an empty file named op-9.2.ly.NEW, and the original file is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
to work. These chords are really
beautiful, and something very bad is happening to them.
Is this a bugreport - if yes, please be clear about your gripes.
a:maj7+9 s s % this chord is supposed to be an A9maj7 or Amaj9
% or Amaj7add9 or Amaj79. Instead
23 matches
Mail list logo
