I browsed the news section of 2.9.x and it struck me like lightning!
This is _so_ easy now! See example.
Markus
%%% Begin Snippet
\version "2.9.14"
\score {
<<
\new Staff {
\relative c'' {
\voiceOne
<<
{
\tweak #'padding #2.5
\times
On Fri 11 August 2006 16:47, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 00:59:10 +0200, eyolf ostrem wrote:
> > I read though your old posts on this matter, and I agree on many of your
> > points. Your syntax scheme for chord naming is admirably precise:
> >
> > root [m] [farthest unaltered
Markus Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Henrik,
>
> > > this is odd indeed, I can only assume that 2.9.14 typesets tuplet
> brackets
> > > differently (ie. both at the same spot in this case).
> > Are you running 2.9.14 and did it look OK then?
> Yes, I do and it looks OK, but I'm alm
Markus Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Henrik,
>
> the problem is to move apart the two consecutive "\time n/m {}" statements,
> so that the overrides only affect one set of tuplets.
>
> See two examples below. The first one reports a "warning: ignoring too many
> clashing note columns
Thanks Mats and Nicolas !!!
That works perfect... thanx for the tip on \displayMusic... I will be
using it more often ;-)
cheers,
pietro
On 8/11/06, Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Pietro Casella wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm trying to c
> The most convenient solution for you, would have been if such
> a short score could contain just a simple \markup{...}
> expression, just as an .ly file can.
> However, it seems that the resulting inserted .eps file will
> have lots of white space around the actual markup, so it will
> end up
You're completely right, sorry about forgetting about all musician that
don't use keys ;), it was getting late at the moment I wrote it. But I guess
we agree on the fact that a C is not equally pitched as B#. And as a result
there's a difference between a B# and C chord.
Thanks for correcting me,
Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Pietro Casella wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm trying to create something like this:
>>
>> blankbar = #(define-music-function (parser location x) (number?)
>> #{
>> \repeat unfold $x {s1}
>> #})
>>
>> \blankbar #56
> I'm afraid you have hit a limitat
> Also, lilypond-book does currently not support plain TeX in any way,
> since it includes each score line as a .eps/.pdf using
> \includegraphics{...}, so there's no need to consider plain TeX.
>
> I think we can simply remove the [EMAIL PROTECTED] without any
> problems.
OK.
Werner
[ Lilypond 2.9.14 ]
Hello, all --
Does anyone recognize this error, or is this a known issue in the
current build:
warning: Unknown event class apply-output-event
\overrideProperty
#"Score.NonMusicalPaperColumn"
As a result of this issue,
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 17:48:54 +0200, Eyolf Ostrem wrote:
> On Sat 05 August 2006 09:22, you wrote:
>> > I'm tempted to suggest a sponsorship for a revision of the chord name
>> > system - any takers?
>>
>> i would support it with some amount of money.
>>
>> here is a pdf i posted some time ago on t
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 21:05:53 +1000, Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 09:40:08AM +0200, "Johannes Schöpfer" wrote:
>>... it is maybe not useful that lilypond plays the chords in the
>>midi-files. "band-in-a-box" is a program only for this reason and has
>>also problems to do it co
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 09:40:08 +0200, Johannes Schöpfer wrote:
>
>> So if the given notes generated a name like "Em7add11add13" now, I would
>> prefer to see "Em7(11 13)" (where the 11 and 13 are stacked vertically
>> with one set of parenthesis).
>
> it would be great if th input-syntax would be
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 00:59:10 +0200, eyolf ostrem wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:39:19 -0400
> David Raleigh Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> As I wrote years ago, the best thing to do is to adhere to that strictly
>> limited symbol set, and always to base spelling on quick recognition
>> r
Hi Henrik,
the problem is to move apart the two consecutive "\time n/m {}" statements,
so that the overrides only affect one set of tuplets.
See two examples below. The first one reports a "warning: ignoring too many
clashing note columns" - but typesetting is optimal IMO, second one compiles
wit
Hello Henrik,
> > this is odd indeed, I can only assume that 2.9.14 typesets tuplet
brackets
> > differently (ie. both at the same spot in this case).
> Are you running 2.9.14 and did it look OK then?
Yes, I do and it looks OK, but I'm almost shure it didn't as I posted the
example first. Anyway,
Hi,
Here's another thing relating to tuplet brackets. Can someone please
help on how to uncollide these brackets of the nested tuplets. I've run
out of options, though I might be overlooking something...
Thanks!
/henrik
\version "2.9.14"
\score {
<<
\new Staff {
\relative c'' {
Hi
Yesterday I just installed lilypond 2.8.6 for Darwin, but I am receiving
a lot of warnings about glyphs:
programming error: FT_Get_Glyph_Name returns error
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: Glyph has no name, but font supports glyph naming.
Skipping glyph.
continuing, cross fin
Markus Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm,
>
> this is odd indeed, I can only assume that 2.9.14 typesets tuplet brackets
> differently (ie. both at the same spot in this case).
Are you running 2.9.14 and did it look OK then?
>
> But the problem isn't gone, I paste a section of tuplets f
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
I no longer remember the details but it was necessary, obviously :-)
What about saying
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
instead? The `=' is just syntactical sugar and not needed. Does it
work then?
Thanks for reminding me that lilypond-book should support both latex and
texi
hi everybody,
i want to mute the notes between \improvisationOn and \improvisationOff in the
midi output.
can anybody help me?
\score {
{ b b b b
\improvisationOn
b b b b
\improvisationOff
b b b b }
\midi {}
\layout {}
}
johnny
--
http://www.johannes-schoepfer.de
"Feel free" – 10 GB
One solution is to exploit lilypond-book, i.e. to include a short "score"
that contains only the symbol you want to see. For example, to just include
a single note, you can do
\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\begin{document}
This is a document with a
\begin[notime,fragment]{lilypond}
\new Staff
I'm afraid you have hit a limitation in the use of #{...#}. My
recommendation
is to change to plan B, which is described in the section on "Building
complicated
functions" in the manual for version 2.9.x.
/Mats
Pietro Casella wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to create something like this:
blank
Jon Wild wrote:
Diosnel's suggestion below might have been a good idea if I were
starting from scratch, but there's just been too much work put into
formatting, tweaking tables, importing equations and so forth that
there's no way I'm going to scrap it and learn how to do all that in
lily
Actually, that bit about "all instruments are tuned in a mathematical
way" is just plain wrong :-)
Think about it ... apart from the open strings, how do you guarantee
that an a# is a b-flat on a violin? Or any other violin-like stringed
instrument, for that matter?
I play the trombone, and I alw
Paul Scott wrote:
Actually it's:
\repeat "tremolo" 8 { c32 d32 }
and I think it would be good if those numbers were documented a little
better.
I think it means repeat two 32nd notes 8 times.
Yes, it works the same as all other \repeat commands. Example:
\relative c'{
\time 2/4
\repeat
26 matches
Mail list logo
