Thanks, issue #285
Cheers,
- Graham
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Why make such a complicated example. I think the following example looks
just as ugly:
\version "2.11.16"
\relative c'''{\repeat tremolo 32{ g64 a }}
I forward your email to bug-lilypond.
For the record, the resulting score looks t
yep, that was it,
thank you
Am 08.02.2007 um 22:01 schrieb Bertalan Fodor:
Is it JPedal view? JPedal line drawing is buggy
--- Original Message ---
From: Ole Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: 07. 02. 08., 21:39:09
Subject: TextSpan behaviour
Dear all,
I w
Is it JPedal view? JPedal line drawing is buggy
> --- Original Message ---
> From: Ole Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Sent: 07. 02. 08., 21:39:09
> Subject: TextSpan behaviour
>
> Dear all,
>
> I worked out something with a TextSpanner which behaves (as it shou
Dear all,
I worked out something with a TextSpanner which behaves (as it should
be) as a snippet:
%%
\version "2.10.15"
\new Staff {
\override Voice.TextSpanner #'padding = #2.5
\override Voice.TextScript #'padding = #2.5
\relative c''
{ \time 2/4 fis8[\< g8
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:53:25 -0600, Trevor Bača wrote:
> That's it: NO special input blocks of *any* sort -- no \layout, no
> \paper, no \midi, no \settings, no nothing. Nada. Not even any
> top-level Scheme commands. This would in many ways be a *super* clean
> way of organizing both music content
On 2/8/07, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/8/07, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trevor Bača escreveu:
>
> > Note that this is not a zero-code proposal, however: the idea of
> > collapsing \paper and \layout is a pretty serious structural change,
> > even though I think
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:03:54 -0600, Trevor Bača wrote:
> And the conclusion from the teaching of Lily that I've done so far is
> that *BY FAR AND AWAY* the greatest points of confusion all concern
> file structure.
>
> I can't prove that this confusion results from the implicit-ness of so
> many
On 2/8/07, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Trevor Bača escreveu:
> Note that this is not a zero-code proposal, however: the idea of
> collapsing \paper and \layout is a pretty serious structural change,
> even though I think it makes extremely good sense.
It's actually not. Inside t
On 2/8/07, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Trevor Bača escreveu:
> On 2/7/07, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Trevor Bača escreveu:
>>
>> > Right now both list 1 and list 2 will just be put together into the
>> > outside-of-score (\paper) bucket.
>> >
>> > But it seems
On 2/8/07, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> On a related note, I think it would be cleaner to _always_ require users to put in the
necessary scope levels, i.e. don't have lilypond put the \book block in by default. It
would make it a bit harder to get start
Hello list, hello Mats and Graham,
You wrote:
> Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> >Hint: What type of layout object is it that handles your
> >crescendoText? It's not a TextScript!
>
> Hint #2: there's a list of commonly tweaked layout objects in 5.2 Fixing
> overlapping notation.
oh, yes, thanks, it's
H, you're right ;-)
rene
Am Donnerstag, den 08.02.2007, 16:25 +0100 schrieb Mats Bengtsson:
> Why make such a complicated example. I think the following example looks
> just as ugly:
> \version "2.11.16"
> \relative c'''{\repeat tremolo 32{ g64 a }}
>
> I forward your email to bug-lilyp
Why make such a complicated example. I think the following example looks
just as ugly:
\version "2.11.16"
\relative c'''{\repeat tremolo 32{ g64 a }}
I forward your email to bug-lilypond.
For the record, the resulting score looks the same also in version 2.8.
/Mats
René Brandenburger wro
> "Mats" == Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mats> So, the simple solution should be to just clear your out/ directory.
Thanks. That's it. This is what comes of trying to do work too early
in the morning.
--
Laura (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] , http://www.laymusic.org/ )
(617)
Hi list,
i'm not sure if this should be considered a bug or if tweaking some
settings may help, but in the following snippet, the tremolo bars touch
the note heads as shown in the attached file.
\version "2.11.16"
\new PianoStaff {
\set PianoStaff.instrumentName = \markup {1\super{er} Pia
Would it be possible to implement something like Perl's use strict
pragma? That would let people who need to do something quick-and-easy
do so, while encouraging more formal structure in general.
Geoff
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.
I'm not convinced that's a bad thing. That's really not that much "extra" to
type into a file and it really is a *lot* clearer. (I say this based on the
fact that there are people, me included, who have worked with LP for years and
are only just now grasping the true structure and mechanics o
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On a related note, I think it would be cleaner to _always_ require users to put in the
necessary scope levels, i.e. don't have lilypond put the \book block in by default. It
would make it a bit harder to get started, but would make it much easier to move from the
"be
Hi all,
I'm typesetting an organ piece by Reinberger. The LH is the same musical line
as the RH (expect for a few notes at the very end), only offset by 1 beat. In
my edition it is typeset with the beaming in the LH spanning the bar lines so
it is clear it follows the RH. Is there a way to s
lilypond-book --pdf will certainly generate .pdf versions of all the
files that are included with \includegraphics. My guess is that you didn't
clean your old lily-*.eps files, which means that lilypond-book is "clever"
enough to not rerun lilypond on the scores but stupid enough to not
realize th
> -Original Message-
> From: Han-Wen Nienhuys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > If I comment out the score-level indent, then the book-level indent
> > will take over. If I comment out both the score-level and
> book-level
> > indents, then the top-level indent will take over.
>
> No, t
Laura Conrad escreveu:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/lilypond/test$ ls out/lily-699cf55d03-1*
> out/lily-699cf55d03-10.eps out/lily-699cf55d03-16.eps
> out/lily-699cf55d03-11.eps out/lily-699cf55d03-17.eps
> out/lily-699cf55d03-12.eps out/lily-699cf55d03-18.eps
> out/lily-699cf55d03-13.eps out/lily
This is a followup to my own post, after trying some more things.
> "Laura" == Laura Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Mats" == Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mats> I recommend to use the pdflatex mode of lilypond-book:
Mats> lilypond-book --pdf --output=out 1-tes
You mean something like
\layout{
\context{
\Score
\remove Repeat_acknowledge_engraver
\remove Default_bar_line_engraver
}
\context{
\Staff
\consists Repeat_acknowledge_engraver
\consists Default_bar_line_engraver
}
}
\score{
<<
\new Staff { \repeat volta 3 {c1 c c } \alte
I started using Lilipond to create leadsheets a couple of weeks ago and
was very impressed with the printouts! Only problem was, that I found it
very difficult to navigate the code while doing changes to lyrics and
notes. Trying to find which lyrics word goes with which note seemed like
a lot o
Mats,
I replaced my line with yours -- exactly -- , and now Lily crashes -- is
there something missing, or do I need to put some code somewhere else?
Fr. Gordon+
On 08/02/07, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The easiest is probably to use \addlyrics. By default, this will result
in a
The easiest is probably to use \addlyrics. By default, this will result
in a new lyrics
line below the current, but you can use the alignAboveContext property
to fix that:
a4 b2 d4 e2 e4 fis2 {e4 d4( c) }\addlyrics { \set
alignAboveContext = "upper" like me }
Note that I included one note e
I hope that this is clearer.
Staff 1
volta 3 with 3 measures one measure 1st and one measure 2nd ending.
Staff 2 with 7 measures \bar ":|" the 4th measure has a segno or 'al fine'
sending musician to a final measure at end.
It's not a conducting score so that kind of readability is not the point
On 07/02/07, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Read the section on Automatic Accidentals. I guess you want to add
#(set-accidental-style 'forget)
[...]
italics = \override LyricText #'font-shape = #'italic
These are the commands I was looking for (and for now, I can live with
the w
Mats Bengtsson escreveu:
>
> When it comes to syntax, I just want to remind everybody that we used to
> have
> a single directive \paper corresponding to the current \layout and
> \book, until
> version 2.4, but it was split into the two in an attempt to clarify what
> you could
> do where. See
>
Trevor Bača escreveu:
> Note that this is not a zero-code proposal, however: the idea of
> collapsing \paper and \layout is a pretty serious structural change,
> even though I think it makes extremely good sense.
It's actually not. Inside the code it's already implemented like that.
The differenc
Trevor Bača escreveu:
> On 2/7/07, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Trevor Bača escreveu:
>>
>> > Right now both list 1 and list 2 will just be put together into the
>> > outside-of-score (\paper) bucket.
>> >
>> > But it seems that may list 1 is really concerned with the *the layout
Trevor Bača escreveu:
> (If I'm getting something factually incorrect, somebody please correct me.)
No, this is correct, albeit a bit more wordy than how I would phrase it. :-)
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
LilyPond Software Design
-- Code for Music N
Trevor Bača wrote:
But what about the (semantic) grouping that I started this thread
with? Doesn't it still make sense to group, for example, these ...
ragged-bottom
ragged-last-bottom
system-count
between-system-space
between-system-padding
horizontal-shift
... settings together someho
I don't understand what you want to do. If you want to print the full score
with both parts, then I cannot see how it would be possible to get a
readable
score if you keep the original repeats from the separate parts. What layout
do you want?
/Mats
Jay Hamilton wrote:
I wrote a little chaco
Trevor Bača wrote:
\layout has another function, although it may be a special case of one
of its other uses. If a \score block contains a \midi block the
\layout block is needed if PDF output is also desired.
Ah right. I remember that coming up a while back.
OK, duly noted. If there's supp
36 matches
Mail list logo
