GDP: pitches second draft

GDP has a new home, which should be much more reliable: http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/ (follow the link to GDP output) This is the second draft of Pitches. Please have a look; it's been significantly updated. Remaining items are Misc formatting: - add more links to glossary - maybe more

GDP: expressive first draft

GDP has a new home, which should be much more reliable: http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/ (follow the link to GDP output) This is the first draft of Expressive marks. Planned work: REWRITE - articulations. clean up first example, rewrite with appendix list of articulations in mind. -

Take the Grand Documentation Project challenge!

As you are hopefully aware, we are currently engaged in a short-term (2-4 month) project to vastly improve the documentation. You can see the results here: http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/ (follow the link to GDP output) Particularly in chapter 1 Pitches of the user manual. Unfortunately,

Re: GDP: pitches second draft

Dear Graham, The job you've done looks very nice. One thing caught my eye, though. I don't quite get the idea of one image under 1.1.3 Displaying pitches namely Clef. If the image tries to point out the location of the middle C on each staff / clef why there is an F on the lowest staff?

Re: is it possible to glue two staff's together? (hymn solution)

Please let me know if this is going to be sponsored, I'd consider participating. This all has a close relation with my problem stated earlier in this list. I'd like e.g. - Tell a lyrics to offset only if it is necessary, or - Tell a lyrics to offset vertically only up to the end of the current

Re: Take the Grand Documentation Project challenge!

2007/10/17, Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]: As you are hopefully aware, we are currently engaged in a short-term (2-4 month) project to vastly improve the documentation. You can see the results here: http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/ (follow the link to GDP output) Argh! This is tough...

Re: GDP: pitches second draft

I am working on splitting the pitch into pitchclass and pitch. - Pitchclasses not containing octave information. I am not nearly finished with this, and perhaps the whole thing will be rejected. But I think it would be a shame to do a lot of work on the Pitch documentation just before a change

Re: GDP: pitches second draft

How would this affect the user interface? I got the impression that it was mostly a matter of the internal representation in the implementation. /Mats Rune Zedeler wrote: I am working on splitting the pitch into pitchclass and pitch. - Pitchclasses not containing octave information. I am not

Re: GDP: pitches second draft

A few minor comments: - Why are the links to the Program reference of LedgerLineSpanner and NoteHead in the subsection on Accidentals? To me it would be just as intuitive (or non-intuitive) to have these links some other of subsubsections of 1.1 Pitches, or even in 1.1 Pitches itself. The

Re: Japanese translation

Dear Mr. Percival, Thank you for your reply. OK, I pulled git repository of web docs, and will do translation of these first. But make fails as following, File scripts/format-page.py, line 419, in ? main () File scripts/format-page.py, line 409, in main read_build_versions

GDP: html sections

It is true that second-level titles like 1.1 Pitches do not contain any useful information; that is not likely to change. (I should explicitly state this in the doc policy, though.) The intent was for 1.1.1 Writing pitches to be a single HTML page, including all the @unnumberedsubsubsec.

Re: GDP: links to other doc sections

It was originally written this way, but I would rather keep all the links in the @seealso section at the bottom. If we absolutely must include some links in the main text, I suppose we could... but I am not (yet) convinced that this is one such case. I've flagged this as an issue for rewriting.

Re: Take the Grand Documentation Project challenge!

Valentin Villenave wrote: Anyway, as soon as I can, you can count me in. I can't wait! What's your pledge? 1 hour per week, 2 hours, 15 minutes...? Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: GDP: pitches second draft

Thanks for catching this; we'll fix it soon. Cheers, - Graham Risto Vääräniemi wrote: Dear Graham, The job you've done looks very nice. One thing caught my eye, though. I don't quite get the idea of one image under 1.1.3 Displaying pitches namely Clef. If the image tries to point out the

Re: GDP: pitches second draft

I agree with Mats. As a further caution, Rune: if your patch significantly changes the input format, the chances of it being accepted are lower. Cheers, - Graham Mats Bengtsson wrote: How would this affect the user interface? I got the impression that it was mostly a matter of the internal

Re: Japanese translation

Hi Ishizaki-san, Unfortunately I don't really know how the website works, and even less about the translations. I have CC'd John Mandereau, who is in charge of the translations. He should be able to help you with this. Cheers, - Graham Ishizaki wrote: Dear Mr. Percival, Thank you for

Re: Take the Grand Documentation Project challenge!

2007/10/17, Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Valentin Villenave wrote: Anyway, as soon as I can, you can count me in. I can't wait! What's your pledge? 1 hour per week, 2 hours, 15 minutes...? Right now, it's just a couple of minutes every now and then on my girlfriend's iBook or

beam bug?

I believe I saw this previously reported, but haven't found the discussion (or a temporary resolution). An 8th followed by a 16th rest and 2 or more 16th notes results in the bar extending to the left of the first 16th note. In the following snippet, the first group is logical; the beam