On 2 Nov 2007, at 02:30, immanuel litzroth wrote:
I tried to compile lilypond with the help of macports today and I
don't
have much good news.
1) The guile in macports didn't seem to compile for me due to some
errors related to open64 and such. A downloaded guile had the same
problem but
[resent because i initially sent with a wrong sender address]
Op vrijdag 2 november 2007, schreef Ole Schmidt:
I'am a bit shy to out my ignorance...
what I'am missing (maybe I overlooked it) is an overview (maybe a
sort of tree?) of how the
all the terms:
\score
\new Staff
\new Voice
2007/11/1, Dominic Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The reason I use LaTeX is that I know LaTeX very well as a typesetting
engine for mathematical documents and therefor I´m used to it. However
LaTeX isn´t too comfortable for this, but it works. I´m very
interested in trying ConTeXt -- I hope, I´ll
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Ole Schmidt wrote:
I'am a bit shy to out my ignorance...
what I'am missing (maybe I overlooked it) is an overview (maybe a sort
of tree?) of how the
all the terms:
These issues are described to some extent in the section on Explicitly
instantiating
voices.
I
Ole Schmidt wrote:
I'am a bit shy to out my ignorance...
what I'am missing (maybe I overlooked it) is an overview (maybe a sort
of tree?) of how the
all the terms:
\score
\new Staff
\new Voice
\VoiceOne
\VoiceTwo
\oneVoice
are (hieracial) related and how their encapsulation ( and {
On 02.11.2007 (16:26), Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
Op vrijdag 2 november 2007, schreef Ole Schmidt:
There is also the { } \\ { } model for polyphony, when to use
which construction?
The short answer is that this is used for single-staff polyphony, but since
giving a short answer is
Hi Immanuel
I worked around the guile problem by upgrading my portfile to 1.8.3
and manually adding #undef HAVE_STAT64 in config.h after the
configure phase. However lilypond will complain about not beeing able
to dlopen libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3.so. I solved this problem by just
setting
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 06:44:46AM +1000, Joe Neeman wrote:
OK, I will set VerticalAlignment #'max-stretch = 0 by default. This has the
disadvantage that it will sometimes put lots of whitespace between systems,
but that was the default in 2.10 anyway.
Thank you. I take it that's the same
Am 02.11.2007 um 15:13 schrieb Mats Bengtsson:
Another point are the rules of the \relative mode when you have
polyphony/chord constructions (how to use , and ' properly)
Could you please check the following draft of the new revised manual
and see if it provides the relevant information:
Am Donnerstag, 1. November 2007 schrieb Joe Neeman:
OK, I will set VerticalAlignment #'max-stretch = 0 by default.
Great!
This has the
disadvantage that it will sometimes put lots of whitespace between systems,
but that was the default in 2.10 anyway.
If you look at the attached file
John
The usual cause of this behaviour is because LilyPond cannot
find a suitable place to break the line. Line breaks can
occur only at 'complete' bars, ie where the last note(s) in
the bar in all staves end(s) at the automatically inserted
barline. If any note carries over no break can take
I'am a bit shy to out my ignorance...
what I'am missing (maybe I overlooked it) is an overview (maybe a
sort of tree?) of how the
all the terms:
\score
\new Staff
\new Voice
\VoiceOne
\VoiceTwo
\oneVoice
are (hieracial) related and how their encapsulation ( and { })
works
There is
Graham Percival wrote:
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Ole Schmidt wrote:
I'am a bit shy to out my ignorance...
what I'am missing (maybe I overlooked it) is an overview (maybe a
sort of tree?) of how the
all the terms:
These issues are described to some extent in the section on
Explicitly
Le 2 nov. 07 à 18:09, Monk Panteleimon a écrit :
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 06:44:46AM +1000, Joe Neeman wrote:
OK, I will set VerticalAlignment #'max-stretch = 0 by default. This
has the
disadvantage that it will sometimes put lots of whitespace between
systems,
but that was the default
[resent because i initially sent with a wrong sender address]
Op woensdag 31 oktober 2007, schreef Reinhold Kainhofer:
Hi,
How can I create a snap-pizzicato (aka. Bartok-pizzicato) in lilypond?
The articulation should look like the one shown in Wikipedia:
On 02.11.2007 (11:05), Paul Scott wrote:
I haven't needed to look at the tutorial in a while. This is great!!
Thanks to everyone improving the documentation!!!
there's always room for one more to look at it, if you discover that your
new enthusiasm becomes too overwhelming :)
Eyolf
--
With 2.11.34 rehearsal marks seem to sit on top of the skyline. This
places them closer to the system above than the one they belong to. Is
there a way to allow them to move closer to the system?
I have tried 0 padding and both outside-staff settings and Googled and
read the Rehearsal Mark
Moved back to list:
Steven Weber wrote:
I always use extra-offset: \once \override Score.RehearsalMark
#'extra-offset = #'( 0 . -2 )
It's not optimal, since it removes the rehearsal mark from future collision
detection, but if you're just moving it vertically, it should be fine.
Thanks! I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 2. November 2007 schrieb Wilbert Berendsen:
Op woensdag 31 oktober 2007, schreef Reinhold Kainhofer:
Hi,
How can I create a snap-pizzicato (aka. Bartok-pizzicato) in lilypond?
The articulation should look like the one shown in
Hey everyone!
I'm hoping one of the Scheme gods on the list can tell me what I'm doing
wrong here. I'm trying to create a markup function that will draw harp
pedal diagrams. To do that, I need a function that takes 7 parameters. My
function works fine as long as there are only 3 parameters
As always, see here:
http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/
Here's the TODO list for Staff. If there's anything to add, please
speak up now.
QUESTIONS
System start delimiters:
The difference between GrandStaff and StaffGroup should be
explained here. As it now stands, it seems as if the only
I've decided to do the rest of the first drafts right now.
http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/
Here's the TODO list.
Educational notation
- Improvisation: link to relevant section of Changing default?
is this still valid? introduce \with in LM?
REWRITE
- most is pretty good.
- Blank music
Final first draft.
http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/
Here's the current list:
Text
REWRITE
- overview of text entry: rename? Also, fill in.
- or possibly delete it?
- text scripts: for the love of $DEITY, change the first example.
\fatText goes into @commonprop
- text spanners: is
23 matches
Mail list logo
