Hello;
In the last bar of a section which has been created with many staff
switches, I either have two extra bars in the left hand or one to few,
leaving no double repeat dots. This is part of the B section of a
piece which I will piece together by using include ,
include , include ,A-section.ly.>
On Dec 30, 2007, at 9:59 PM, hhpmusic wrote:
Sorry, the octave of rh is wrong, for I'm writing the file in my
braille computer with braille keys. I often miswrite ' to ,.
But the error is still here.
I now have both staves. Something you will have to deal with is that
LilyPond is cas
On Dec 30, 2007, at 9:59 PM, hhpmusic wrote:
Sorry, the octave of rh is wrong, for I'm writing the file in my
braille computer with braille keys. I often miswrite ' to ,.
But the error is still here.
I now have both staves. Something you will have to deal with is that
LilyPond is cas
On Dec 30, 2007, at 9:51 PM, hhpmusic wrote:
These are my files.
I'll check more in a few minutes but I never create a Staff of any
kind inside a \relative{ ... }. Try reversing the \relative and \new
Staff for each hand.
Paul
___
lilypond-
Sorry, the octave of rh is wrong, for I'm writing the file in my braille
computer with braille keys. I often miswrite ' to ,.
But the error is still here.
\version "2.11.36"
\header {
title = "Dragon Boat Tune"
subtitle = "Transcriptions of Hubei Folksongs, No.1"
composer = "Hu Haip
These are my files.
lcd2.log
Description: Binary data
\version "2.11.36"
\header {
title = "Dragon Boat Tune"
subtitle = "Transcriptions of Hubei Folksongs, No.1"
composer = "Hu Haipeng"
}
\score {
\new PianoStaff <<
\relative c,, {
\new staff { \clef treble \time 4
Sorry for my headlongness! I thought it will turn good, but no. The log file
still said it cannot create new staff, no matter where I placed \relative
(before or after \new staff { }). I'm sending you both the .ly and log files,
and, what does 18:33 and 18:13 before the error message "ignoring t
On Dec 30, 2007, at 7:19 PM, hhpmusic wrote:
(note: lcd means the first letters of Chinese spelling of the piece)
Hi, I'm Hu Haipeng. I just transcribed my transcription of a
Chinese folksong into Lilypond, but the result is bad. The first
bar, I made 3 voices, the second is a cue of the sp
(note: lcd means the first letters of Chinese spelling of the piece)
Hi, I'm Hu Haipeng. I just transcribed my transcription of a Chinese folksong
into Lilypond, but the result is bad. The first bar, I made 3 voices, the
second is a cue of the special mordent (but I haven't learn how to write
or
I used to be able to replace the breath mark with something like the
following which I have corrected for the new straight caesura glyph name:
caesuraOn = \override BreathingSign #'text =
#(make-musicglyph-markup "scripts.caesura.straight")
The \breathe command would put the caesura glpyh right
Hi Patrick,
thanks a lot for your help! The option --left-padding=0 reduced the redundant
space on the left side and improved the layout on the right side of the
fragment within the brackets. I don't want to be pedantic ;-) but is there an
option to get rid off the space on the right side (fra
Stefan Thomas skrev:
I have a problem with the behavior of the automatic accidentals in
the "forget-sytle". For example, in my opinion the accidental of the
B-flat at the end of the 5th measure should be shown again, but not
in the beginning of the 6th measure.
I cannot reproduce the problem.
O
Thanks for your help. It works now. Mike
Eyolf Østrem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 29.12.2007 (23:17), Michael Nelson
wrote:
> Hi guys. I'm a new user of Lilypond. I'm notating an old (out of copyright)
> edition of Bach's Invention 1. I was happy to get through the first 5 bars
> with re
Dear all,
I have the following problem:
When hiding staves via "\RemoveEmptyStaffContext" I
get unwanted barlines between the Lyrics.
Please find below a (somehow) minimal example where
the problem can be seen in the second line.
Thanks for any hints or solutions,
Robert
EXAMPLE:
--
Hi Jeremiah,
Thank you TWICE over for your help.
You're twice-over welcome! =)
Your code worked perfectly.
I try my best...
Very frustrating!
(This is a rhetorical question; no response necessary.)
Decided to respond anyway!
How can I figure out "new" code to solve "new" problems whe
Hi Stefan,
unfortunately, it didn't work.
Hmmm... works fine for me, e.g.,
___
\version "2.11.33"
\layout { ragged-right = ##t }
flagStuff = \relative
{
c'8 c4 c8 c c4 c8
\override Stem #'flag-style = #'no-flag
c8 c4 c8 c c4 c8
\re
Hi Valentin (etc.) --
I understand Han-Wen is quite busy right now; maybe the simplest way
to do this would be to add such a macro to the LSR, without
necessarily including it in the standard LilyPond distribution.
What I *meant* was, I'm pretty sure this is already done!
I was just asking Han
> I think what you're looking for is the --left-padding parameter.
> Just call lilypond-book with --left-padding=0. You can find this in the
> manual, AU(Application Usage), 4.4, "Invoking LilyPond". See also 4.3.,
> "Music fragment options"
Hi Michael,
thanks a lot for your help! The option -
Hi Patrick,
the baseline of the lilypond fragment is now identical with the letter's
baseline. Have you got any idea why there is so much horizontal space in
between the round brackets and the fragment: ( fragment )?
I think what you're looking for is the --left-padding parameter.
Just c
Dear Lilypond-users,
I have a problem with the behavior of the automatic accidentals in
the "forget-sytle". For example, in my opinion the accidental of the
B-flat at the end of the 5th measure should be shown again, but not
in the beginning of the 6th measure. And I also don't understand why
the t
On 29.12.2007 (23:17), Michael Nelson wrote:
> Hi guys. I'm a new user of Lilypond. I'm notating an old (out of copyright)
> edition of Bach's Invention 1. I was happy to get through the first 5 bars
> with remarkably few problems. But I have hit a snag in bar 6. See the
> snapshot of the o
21 matches
Mail list logo
