Reinhold Kainhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Montag, 31. März 2008 schrieb Wilbert Berendsen:
Related question: isn't there a simpler way to just merge rests if they
occur in both voices? Something like:
\override Staff.NoteColumn #'merge-rests = ##t
You know, the LSR contains lots
Hi Eric
One problem can be solved easily. To get the slur to ignore the staccato
dot add immediately before the staccato note:
\once \override Script #'avoid-slur = #'outside
This puts the dot outside the slur.
The other problems are not so straightforward to solve.
Layout problems
Papa Eric wrote:
Hi,
In the following code I cannot solve two problems:
-
\version 2.11.42
{ \voiceTwo
d'8
\acciaccatura {\once \override Stem #'direction = #up c'8} d'8
\acciaccatura {\once \override Stem #'direction = #up c'8} d'8-.
}
\layout {
ragged-last = ##t
}
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 21:48:41 -0700
Patrick McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Andrew Hawryluk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In NR 1.3.3.2, could we change the second snippet to read
\arpeggioBracket
c e g c\arpeggio
\arpeggioNeutral
c e g
Hi again, all,
I know that the copyright notice will appear in the footer of the first
page, and the LilyPond tagline will appear in the footer of the last page.
But what about if the piece were only one page long? I decided to customize
oddFooterMarkup in my ly file:
\version 2.10.25
Trevor Daniels wrote:
div class=moz-text-flowed style=font-family: -moz-fixedLilyPond-ers
Grand Documentation Project
Graham and his helpers have now completed a large part of the GDP
revision of the first chapter of the Notation Reference (NR), most of
the Learning Manual (LM) is finished,
2008/4/4 Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2) If I remove the first d'8 note, the stem direction of the d note
becomes up, as if the \once did not work well.
Ugly! Yet another problem with grace notes! Note that the problem remains
the same even if you
remove the \once \override setting
2008/4/4 Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Let's add \arpeggioWavy or something like that for cancelling
\arpeggioBracket. I'm not enamored of the name, though. Any
other suggestions?
\arpeggioClassic?
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-user
Could I get 15 minutes of work from somebody familiar with the IR?
Take a look at NR 1.1 Pitches. Can you find any other
internals reference items for the @seealso list?
If you can, just send me an email listing the extra terms, like:
Accidentals
accidental_note_engraver
sharpSign
2008/4/4, Romel Anthony S. Bismonte [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
... This file renders fine, but the copyright does not
appear. ...Perhaps 2.11.* renders this the way I expect? ^_^
In 2.11.43 this gives the two lines at the bottom of the first (single) page:
\header { copyright=This is the copyright
2008/4/4 Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Could I get 15 minutes of work from somebody familiar with the IR?
Take a look at NR 1.1 Pitches. Can you find any other
internals reference items for the @seealso list?
I'm on it.
Cheers,
Valentin
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:12:01 +0200
Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/4/4 Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Could I get 15 minutes of work from somebody familiar with the IR?
Take a look at NR 1.1 Pitches. Can you find any other
internals reference items for the @seealso
Graham Percival wrote
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 21:48:41 -0700
Patrick McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Andrew Hawryluk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In NR 1.3.3.2, could we change the second snippet to read
\arpeggioBracket
c e g c\arpeggio
Is is possible to center all lyric syllables, even those where the note has a
tie attached? I tried using \override LyricText #'self-alignment-X = #0, but
this property doesn't seem to affect notes with ties.
Thanks,
Greg.
---
\version 2.10.10
melody = \relative c''
{
g1 ~ g2 g
}
2008/4/4 Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ok. In that case, you can commit directly. And when you're
finished Pitches, do Editorial.
Great.
Do we need to mention exotic things such as Note_performer? If so, where?
Cheers,
Valentin
___
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:27:01 +0100
Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, Graham, \arpeggioNeutral *does* cancel \arpeggioBracket,
if fact all the \arpeggioXXX commands contain a \revert Arpeggio
#'stencil, so they all cancel \arpeggioBracket.
I guess the argument is that
Ian Hulin wrote:
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Grand Documentation Project
Do we need a 2.4.4 under Fretted stringed instruments for Mandolin, or a
2.4.5 for the viols?
Happy to add them if we have something to write under the heading which is
specific to those instruments. Do you have anything
Hi Greg,
Is is possible to center all lyric syllables,
even those where the note has a tie attached?
Serendipitously, I sponsored this precise feature last summer:
\layout
{
\context { \Score lyricMelismaAlignment = #0 }
}
I believe Han-Wen added it into 2.11.30 so you might need to
Hi Trevor,
I'm broadly happy with the proposed layout. There are just two minor
issues I have:
1. Section 2.1.4.3 should be changed to Adding singers' names to
stanzas, unless we're talking about pseudonyms and stage names :)
2. Under Keyboard instruments, I'd prefer Changing staff manually
to
Neil Puttock wrote:
I'm broadly happy with the proposed layout. There are just two minor
issues I have:
1. Section 2.1.4.3 should be changed to Adding singers' names to
stanzas, unless we're talking about pseudonyms and stage names :)
Good catch. Probably stage names are more commonly
Am Donnerstag, den 03.04.2008, 18:30 +0100 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
René Brandenburger wrote:
a topic which I think could be interisting is
2.7 Lyrics and repeats
Good idea. Added. I might come back to you for some
ideas for the text later :)
you're welcome ;-)
Trevor D
Thanks for your answers,
About the voice beginning with a grace note, I have perhaps found a
workout that seems to work at least in this simple case. When a voice
begins with a grace note, use \beforeGrace in all voices as follows:
-
\version 2.11.42
% if cadenza really never count for
Ralph Palmer wrote:
Grand Documentation Project
Under
2.3.1 Bowed instruments
I'd like to see Fingerings
I'm not a string player and know nothing of this. Is the
normal fingering notation shown in NR 1.7.1 adequate for
this, or are you looking for something peculiar to strings?
and
If you're sharing it with the community, send it to the list as well!
---BeginMessage---
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Federico Grau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I would like to have chord names shown as roman numerals.
Ex: in the key of D minor
names
Many thanks! I have now upgraded.
Greg.
On 4 Apr 2008, at 19:41, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Greg,
Is is possible to center all lyric syllables,
even those where the note has a tie attached?
Serendipitously, I sponsored this precise feature last summer:
\layout
{
\context { \Score
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 23:18:18 +0100
Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ralph Palmer wrote:
2.3.1 Bowed instruments
I'd like to see Fingerings
I'm not a string player and know nothing of this. Is the
normal fingering notation shown in NR 1.7.1 adequate for
this, or are you
Michael Watts zwy648rct at gmail.com writes:
Try putting the textspanners into a separate voice with spacer notes.
IIRC a textspanner needs to start on a 'real' note, so your
textspanner voice would need transparent noteheads and stems.
You can put TextSpanners on spacer note. However,
I am a string player and as far as I can remember other than upbow downbow all
the other articulations are similar to those in other instrumental music, the
fingering in 1.7 is useful for strings, and the only 'string' instrument that
_may_ have other markings is the harp which I've only
Matthew rowlesmr at gmail.com writes:
I can't get the left edge for the ottava bracket to work. I want there to be a
left edge, identical to the right.
Is this an OttavaBracket bug? The program-reference doesn't say anything about
values being hardcoded.
Could it be the way that I'm changing
Michael Watts escreveu:
If you're sharing it with the community, send it to the list as well!
Now it is shared. Thanks.
Hugo
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi Matthew,
On 05/04/2008, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this an OttavaBracket bug? The program-reference doesn't say anything
about
values being hardcoded.
My C++ knowledge is minimal, but unless I'm mistaken, it appears that
the left edge is set to 0 after 'edge-height is read in
Hi,
This is the opening of my capriccio for violin and piano. I use the easy
tuplet writing method to set tuplet span to a quarter length, and my manual
beaming in the braces are correct (as I know). But the log file gave a lot of
warnings saying something I don't understand, perhaps a
Hi,
Another qestion is, how to write a femata on the barline? Is there a way to
write it not using the offset or any other horizontal moving commands which I
can't handle without a sighted people?
SIncerely
Haipeng
___
lilypond-user
I may be superstitious, and I'd gather I'm using a far earlier version than
you, but when I start a tuplet I always explicity specify the note length even
if it's supposed to be the same as the previous note. So I'd write:
c16 [c c c] \times 2/3 {d16 [d c b c d e]}And although I don't suspect
Neil Puttock n.puttock at gmail.com writes:
My C++ knowledge is minimal, but unless I'm mistaken, it appears that
the left edge is set to 0 after 'edge-height is read in
ottava-bracket.cc (which implements the print function for
octavations):
So is that a bug, or a feature?
.
have you tried analysis brackets?
from 1.7?
It might work but it looks like you want to do this a lot and if so it's a lot
of copy and paste.
Yours-
Jay
Jay Hamilton
www.soundand.com
206-328-7694
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject:
Jay Hamilton JayHam at linuxquestions.net writes:
have you tried analysis brackets?
from 1.7?
It might work but it looks like you want to do this a lot and if so it's a lot
of copy and paste.
Yours-
Jay
I had a look at the documentation for 1.8; it seems to be pretty much the same
as
37 matches
Mail list logo
