Daniel Cheramie lilypond at chosenones.dyndns.org writes:
I would like to be able to specify each part individually and
have them combined automatically. Is there some simple way to achieve
this with Lilypond? I can provide an example if needed of one
I have done by hand.
Thanks,
Daniel
Am 04.09.2008 um 03:57 schrieb Daniel Cheramie:
Hi All,
I am typesetting a number of SATB hymns and noticed that mine look
quite ugly
because of not combining stems in the desired manner. The hymnals I
have seen
combine most stems on the SA and TB parts except for:
* Notes less than 2
I'm surprised that nobody has mentioned \partcombine, so far. It's
probably the closest you can
get to your wishes, with the built-in support in LilyPond. See Section
Automatic part combining
in the manual for more information. Note that the current part combiner
has a number of issues,
What if you set the gs command to the full path of gs, and the python
respectively?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kubuntu 8.04
LilyPond 2.11.57
jEdit 4.3pre15
LilyPondTool 2.10.5
--
Hello list,
1)
When I use LilyPondTool for running LilyPond, I get an error message, no
pdf is produced (ps is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe my jEdit plugin configuration is incorrect?
I have:
Path to LilyPond binary: /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin
I guess this should rather be: /usr/local/bin/
If you check what path is used to the lilypond program on your command
line, I bet
that this is what's
2008/9/4 Mats Bengtsson :
I'm surprised that nobody has mentioned \partcombine, so far. It's probably
the closest you can
get to your wishes, with the built-in support in LilyPond. See Section
Automatic part combining
in the manual for more information. Note that the current part combiner has
Hi, Bertalan and other Ponders -
I'm using jEdit and LilyPondTool on XP SP3. I've tried the help function,
but I can't figure out how to disable/turn off the autocomplete function.
It's irritating because I'll type a command and hit the space bar and
sometimes LilyPondTool autocompletes a longer
In the plugin options for SideKick plugin options you can set the
autocompletion characters.
Ralph Palmer wrote:
Hi, Bertalan and other Ponders -
I'm using jEdit and LilyPondTool on XP SP3. I've tried the help
function, but I can't figure out how to disable/turn off the
autocomplete
2008/9/4 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In the plugin options for SideKick plugin options you can set the
autocompletion characters.
Yeah, more specifically:
Plugins menu Plugin Options... Sidekick/General
Accept characters for completion popup :
delete the first
Bertalan wrote:
What if you set the gs command to the full path of gs, and the python
respectively?
This does not help.
Mats wrote:
I guess this should rather be: /usr/local/bin/
This did help for lilypond. For convert-ly I now get an Error running
external command.
But it works from console,
Am 04.09.2008 um 12:00 schrieb Risto Vääräniemi:
2008/9/4 Mats Bengtsson :
I'm surprised that nobody has mentioned \partcombine, so far. It's
probably
the closest you can
get to your wishes, with the built-in support in LilyPond. See
Section
Automatic part combining
in the manual for
2008/9/4 James E. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What's the problem?
\score {
\new Staff \with { printPartCombineTexts = ##f } \partcombine
\voiceone \voicetwo
\new Lyrics \lyricsto voice one \words
}
Thanks for the tip. I was trying to attach the lyrics to the combined
2008/9/4 Risto Vääräniemi:
2008/9/4 James E. Bailey:
What's the problem?
Thanks for the tip. I was trying to attach the lyrics to the combined
voice and not to an original one. Based on the section Automatic part
combining I thought that the original voices wouldn't exist after the
What were you looking for in terms of combining? Typically, I found
partcombine best when the parts are occasionally the same, but it can
be adapted to normal multiple voice music, I guess. In the image that
I see, the lower voice has stems down, the upper voice has stems up
and the lyrics
2008/9/4 James E. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Perhaps a better example would be
voiceone = \context Voice = voice one \relative { c'4 b a g f e f2 c1}
voicetwo = \relative {c'4 b a g f e \stemDown d_( b) \stemNeutral c1}
Have you noticed what happens if you remove \partcombine in your
Am 04.09.2008 um 18:06 schrieb Neil Puttock:
2008/9/4 James E. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Perhaps a better example would be
voiceone = \context Voice = voice one \relative { c'4 b a g f e
f2 c1}
voicetwo = \relative {c'4 b a g f e \stemDown d_( b) \stemNeutral c1}
Have you noticed what
2008/9/4 James E. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What were you looking for in terms of combining?
I was hoping to get results as presented in the attached image
(situation was staged).
I had one song that I wanted to cram into a smaller space. Since all
the rhythms were the same on both voices I
Am 04.09.2008 um 18:17 schrieb Risto Vääräniemi:
2008/9/4 James E. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What were you looking for in terms of combining?
I was hoping to get results as presented in the attached image
(situation was staged).
I had one song that I wanted to cram into a smaller space.
Is it possible to create hidden rests that do not create visible space? I
have used skips to layout a series of variations but there is far too much
white space around the barlines separating variations. I am hoping to
find a way to still use skip but greatly compress the space it generates.
Hi Aaron,
Is it possible to create hidden rests that do not create visible
space?
\override Rest #'X-extent = #'(0 . 0)
Hope this helps!
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
I´m not sure what you exactly want, but maybe you can give us a short
.ly example?
You could try to use s followed by the value of the invisible rest.
Dominic
2008/9/4 Aaron Dalton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is it possible to create hidden rests that do not create visible space? I
have used skips to
It looks like I'm going down a road of rhythmic complexity that breaks
Lilypond rendering in the absence of arbitrary precision arithmetic.
Han-Wen: would it be possible for me to sponsor a move to arbitrary
precision arithmetic? As you say, GUILE does support this option, and it
would be
22 matches
Mail list logo