Re: Bad image with one of the snippets

2008/9/19 Patrick Horgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > No cheer here, much sadness ensues;( Is there a plan? As far as I could understand (since I missed the relevant discussions too ;-) the input/new directory is meant to host snippets that are not compatible with the LSR yet. That being said, since w

Re: fong shape of fingering

I get this when compiling: Stefan Thomas írta: Dear all, maybee You have asked yourself, why I wanted the layout of the fingerings. The reason is: In my opinion lilypond does not handle very well  tuplets in a cross-staff context. The eample below shows first a very strange position of th

Re: Fw: Re: Paper and Header Problem

2008/9/18 Ralph Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I got scared by someone having problems with 2.11.57 (was it?) under WinXP > SP3. This has been fixed, fortunately. >> \paper{ >> scoreTitleMarkup = \markup { \column { >> \fill-line { >>\fromproperty #'header:meter >>\fromprop

Re: v2.11.58-2 guile17 error ppc

2008/9/19 Rembrandt Wolpert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > v2.11.58-3 works -- i.e. the problem is now fixed. Thanks, this allows me to close the issue. Cheers, Valentin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listin

Re: Bad image with one of the snippets

On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:46:55 -0700 Patrick Horgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Graham Percival wrote: > > Yes, because LSR is still running 2.10. New features won't work > > anyway. > > > > Cheers, > > - Graham > > > No cheer here, much sadness ensues;( Is there a plan? Yes, but having expla

Re: fong shape of fingering

Dear all, maybee You have asked yourself, why I wanted the layout of the fingerings. The reason is: In my opinion lilypond does not handle very well tuplets in a cross-staff context. The eample below shows first a very strange position of the number. The second one is convincing. Isn't it possible

Re: png cropping

Patrick! It's all working beautifully now. I've tried about 10 different configurations of options using both the flags and the prompts, and everything worked just as expected. This is a really great tool! I like being able to use either the command-line arguments or the prompts. The argumen

Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!)

Andrew Hawryluk wrote: I just learned that there are a lot of Monet Waterlilies to choose from, so maybe this will be helpful to anyone on the list with graphics skills: With any of the newer browsers you can use pngs with alpha, and take any image and give it much transparency to the point t

Re: Bad image with one of the snippets

Graham Percival wrote: Yes, because LSR is still running 2.10. New features won't work anyway. Cheers, - Graham No cheer here, much sadness ensues;( Is there a plan? Patrick ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gn

Re: png cropping

Jonathan Kulp wrote: Hi Patrick, I've been running your script trying to use the command-line arguments, and something's happening with the format argument. I specify it with an argument, but then I still get prompted for format. I might not be doing the flag right. I've tried it with -f=

Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!)

On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 4:43 PM, John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> - the colors are taken from the Monet "Waterlilies" on the LilyPond homepage > > I find it a good idea, even if we might decide to change this image: > it's a small heavily compressed JPEG image, this is not appealing >

Re: Bad image with one of the snippets

On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:54:09 -0700 Patrick Horgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Neil Puttock wrote: > > > > This snippet is version specific to 2.11; it shouldn't really be in > > LSR, > Does that imply that there's not supposed to be any snippets to show > how to do the new 2.11 stuff? Yes, becau

Re: Bad image with one of the snippets

Neil Puttock wrote: This snippet is version specific to 2.11; it shouldn't really be in LSR, Does that imply that there's not supposed to be any snippets to show how to do the new 2.11 stuff? Patrick but was added so it can be used in the docs. Unfortunately, some of the properties it uses

Re: png cropping

Alright, this is probably my last version. It now checks the input for format against all the available conversions (found by looking for all the programs in the filesystem that start with ppmto and pnmto) and if you didn't pick one, gives you all the choices! Enter desired output format

Re: png cropping

Hi Patrick, I've been running your script trying to use the command-line arguments, and something's happening with the format argument. I specify it with an argument, but then I still get prompted for format. I might not be doing the flag right. I've tried it with -f=jpeg, -f=JPEG, -fJPEG,

Re: png cropping

Cool, Patrick! Your scripting skills are admirable! The only thing that worked unlike I expected was when I was asked if I wanted transparency, I simply hit "enter," thinking it would default to "no" because the N was capitalized, and it prompted me again saying "expecting one of these values

Re: png cropping

Jonathan Kulp wrote: Ok I changed a couple of things to make it even more flexible.  I changed pnmto__ to ppmto__, giving quite a few more output options. I've suggested a few in the script.  Also added an option to choose either gif or png when choosing transparent background.  this is fun :)

Re: v2.11.58-2 guile17 error ppc

v2.11.58-3 works -- i.e. the problem is now fixed. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Fw: Re: Paper and Header Problem

David and Valentin - David, I'm going to try your suggestion. In the meantime, in case it's not clear to either of you exactly what I'm trying to do, I'm attaching a MSWord doc that will (I hope) help. Peace, Ralph On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

Re: Fw: Re: Paper and Header Problem

> I have another solution, that works well (see below). > > >> From: "Ralph Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> I'm running LY 2.11.53 under Windows XP SP3. > > Time to upgrade, maybe? :-) I got scared by someone having problems with 2.11.57 (was it?) under WinXP SP3. Ralph, > > try this is your

Re: Stemlet snippet

2008/9/18 Joseph Wakeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > OK, submitted. I've left out the repeated-note notation as there are > some subtleties of that I want to sort out first. Thank, Joseph. I've approved it so it will appear in the snippets list with the next LSR update. Regards, Neil ___

Re: Bad image with one of the snippets

Hi Patrick, 2008/9/18 Patrick Horgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > In snippet no. 433 the Rehearsal Marks don't have the alignment you might > expect. Grabbing down the snippet and compiling it with the current > lilypond works fine and produces the desired result, but in the image in the > snippet, the

Re: another emacs osx question

On 18 aug 2008, at 13:33, James E. Bailey wrote: Now that emacs can actually run lilypond, I have another problem, I can't run a command on the master file: it doesn't escape the spaces in filenames or folder names. Is there any way I can change this? James, I hope that you've already foun

Re: Fw: Re: Paper and Header Problem

Nice. I look forward to trying this in the future. > --- Original Message --- > From: "Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Ralph Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: 18.9.08, 18:39:59 > Subject: Re: Fw: Re: Paper and Header Problem > > 2008/9/18 David Pounder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bad image with one of the snippets

In snippet no. 433 the Rehearsal Marks don't have the alignment you might expect. Grabbing down the snippet and compiling it with the current lilypond works fine and produces the desired result, but in the image in the snippet, the alignment of the rehearsal marks never move. It made it quite

Re: Fw: Re: Paper and Header Problem

2008/9/18 David Pounder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > title = ##f > subtitle = ##f > > in the header block of the individual pieces. I have another solution, that works well (see below). >> From: "Ralph Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> I'm running LY 2.11.53 under Windows XP SP3. Time to upgrade, maybe

Fw: Re: Paper and Header Problem

Forgot to cc the list... --- Original Message --- From: David Pounder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ralph Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 18.9.08, 18:19:03 Subject: Re: Paper and Header Problem Ralph, I do a lot of similar layouts. Try including title = ##f subtitle = ##f in the header bl

Paper and Header Problem

Help! I sent this (slightly different, actually) to the list yesterday, and got no response, and didn't see my own message. Did it go through? I'm running LY 2.11.53 under Windows XP SP3. I've spent 8 or 10 hours trying to puzzle this out, unsuccessfully. I'm trying to print out sets of tunes (

Re: fong shape of fingering

Risto Vääräniemi wrote: On 18/09/2008, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: \override Score.Fingering #'font-encoding = #'latin1 Well, there is not a single word in the documentation about that latin1 is a valid value for font-encoding. You could be r

Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!)

Le Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:02:55 -0700, "Patrick McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > http://uoregon.edu/~pmccarty/texi2html/lilypond-index.html I personally much prefer the 'green' and more 'flashy' version: it still is quite professional but brings a kind of positive energy AND desire to read m

Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 18 September 2008 00:07:13 Valentin Villenave wrote: > I like the "default" theme's blue-grey colors *very* much, it feels > both calm and serious. For my taste, there are too many different shades of bluish gray on the page, which makes

Re: fong shape of fingering

On 18/09/2008, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> \override Score.Fingering #'font-encoding = #'latin1 >> > Well, there is not a single word in the documentation about that latin1 > is a valid value for font-encoding. You could be right. :-) I once struggled trying t

Re: Tick barlines

Thanks for the solutions on this. Since I didn't notice anything already in NR or LSR, I've submitted a second snippet for this notation. Hope it helps! :-) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lil

Re: fong shape of fingering

\override Score.Fingering #'font-encoding = #'latin1 Well, there is not a single word in the documentation about that latin1 is a valid value for font-encoding. Bert ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org

Re: fong shape of fingering

Dear Risto and Bartalan, thanks! I changed it now succesfully! 2008/9/18 Stefan Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Dear Bartalan, > with > \override Score.Fingering #'font-encoding = ##f > \override Score.Fingering #'font-shape = #'italic > \override Score.Fingering #'font-name = #"roman" > I could c

Re: fong shape of fingering

Dear Bartalan, with \override Score.Fingering #'font-encoding = ##f \override Score.Fingering #'font-shape = #'italic \override Score.Fingering #'font-name = #"roman" I could change the look of the Fingering, but it is still different from the tuplet-number, and it is not italic. Sorry for bothe

Re: fong shape of fingering

Hi Stefan, 2008/9/18 Stefan Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> 2008/9/18 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>> Try to set font-encoding to #f >>> That may switch back to text font style >>> >>> Stefan Thomas wrote: >>> >>> Ok. >>> What I really want is to change the fingerings to l

Stemlet snippet

Graham Percival wrote: > On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:21:07 +0200 > Joseph Wakeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Would people welcome the idea of adding a little section to the 2.10 >> manual and 2.11 NR on stemlets? > > Not directly in the manual, no. > Add it as a snippet in LSR and tag it with rh

Re: fong shape of fingering

It seems you have to set the font-family as well in this case. Try to set it to 'roman Stefan Thomas wrote: Dear Bertalan, I tried now ohnezahl = { \override TupletNumber #'stencil = ##f } \version "2.11.49" triol = \markup { \tiny { \italic 3 } } \new Staff \relative { \override Score.Finger

RE: Voltas and polyphony

Hi again, Through a little more vigilant code checking I found out that my problem stemmed from a bracket pairing mis-count. Sorry to have bothered you all prematurely. Steve CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Voltas and polyphonyDate: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:1

Re: fong shape of fingering

Dear Bertalan, I tried now ohnezahl = { \override TupletNumber #'stencil = ##f } \version "2.11.49" triol = \markup { \tiny { \italic 3 } } \new Staff \relative { \override Score.Fingering #'font-encoding = ##f \override Score.Fingering #'font-shape = #'italic \ohnezahl \times 2/3 {c,8 d^3 f} g2

Re: fong shape of fingering

Try to set |font-encoding to #f That may switch back to text font style | Stefan Thomas wrote: Ok. What I really want is to change the fingerings to look like tuplet-numbers. But I don't know how to do this. 2008/9/18 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: fong shape of fingering

Ok. What I really want is to change the fingerings to look like tuplet-numbers. But I don't know how to do this. 2008/9/18 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I think you first need to change the family, because IIRC it is currently > the music font which has no italic > > Stefan

Re: fong shape of fingering

I think you first need to change the family, because IIRC it is currently the music font which has no italic Stefan Thomas wrote: Dear lilypond-users, how can I change the fontshape of fingerings? I tried it with \override Score.Fingering #'font-shape = #'italic but without success. --

fong shape of fingering

Dear lilypond-users, how can I change the fontshape of fingerings? I tried it with \override Score.Fingering #'font-shape = #'italic but without success. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond