thank you for your explanations
Neil Puttock wrote:
>
>
> Instead of hard-coding the start value, it should be read from the
> Fingering grob (so in your example, it would result in a new priority
> of 14).
>
so in a soonish release we can expect this to change?
or do we need a list of these
Trevor Daniels wrote:
The contexts are normally printed in the order in which they are
defined, so simply moving the \new Lyrics command for the sopranos so
it comes before the \new Staff command for the joint soprano/alto
staff should do it. See the SATB vocal score template in the Notation
Pro:
- LilyPond supports collaboration very well, as these are only text
files (think of mediawiki and other wikis which can support LilyPond).
- LilyPond is free, while Sibelius and Finale's even non-profit licenses
are expensive.
Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
Hi folks,
Next weekend I'll be att
Thanks for pointing that out, Mats. Valentin
has editing rights on vocals at the moment.
I'm sure he'll pick this up.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: ; "Robert Waniek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Valentin
V
2008/10/16 Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks for pointing that out, Mats. Valentin
> has editing rights on vocals at the moment.
> I'm sure he'll pick this up.
Thanks for the ping :-)
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypon
2008/10/16 Cameron Horsburgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 1) What does LilyPond do well?
>
> (I already have that the default output is far better than the
> equivalent in most software I've seen, and it is very quick once the
> basics are mastered. I'll also mention the integration with
> OpenOffice, HT
Cameron Horsburgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'd also appreciate it if anyone had files I could use that show off
>some of the more interesting features of LilyPond. I'll produce some
>printed examples, and if people start scratching their heads trying to
>work out how I did something, I'll have
Well, musipedia.org could show an other interesting example. LilyPond's
format allows search for music phrases.
Tim Slattery wrote:
Cameron Horsburgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd also appreciate it if anyone had files I could use that show off
some of the more interesting features of Lil
For the examples, you may want to use some of the "Inspirational
headwords" from
the latest version of the manual, i.e. the examples at the top of each
(well, at least most)
section of chapters 1 and 2 in
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/
/Mats
Cameron Horsburgh wr
Hi Cameron,
1) What does LilyPond do well?
(I already have that the default output is far better than the
equivalent in most software I've seen, and it is very quick once the
basics are mastered. I'll also mention the integration with
OpenOffice, HTML and LaTeX.)
Difficult modern concepts are
Hi folks,
Next weekend I'll be attending a composing workshop organised by my
church. One of the sessions will cover the relevant software. It seems
the facilitator is going to be showing off Finale and Sibelius, but he
seems willing for me to do a very brief presentation on LilyPond. I'm
not fami
Hi group,
I'm stumped. I'm using code similar to the following:
%
music = {r2 r4 << { f'8 } \\ { f'32 g' a' b' } >> r8 c''1 c''1}
%music = {r2 r4 f'32 g' a' b' r8 c''1 c''1}
\score {
\new Staff {\music}
\layout {
ragged-right = ##f
}
}
\version "2.11.57"
%%%
Check out the "LilyPond Reports" by Valentin Villenave:
http://valentin.villenave.info/-English-
Reports relevant to your question are #5-8 and #10.
Hope this helps.
- Mark
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.
Actually disregard this message. I see the problem now with a grace note in
another voice, so I've got more homework to do first :)
Neil
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Neil Thornock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi group,
> I'm stumped. I'm using code similar to the following:
>
> %%%
2008/10/16 Mark Polesky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Reports relevant to your question are #5-8 and #10.
Thanks for the mention; I strongly hope more are to come as soon as I
have some time :-)
Some of the composers I mention in the LilyReport #10 have their own
website, with some very nice examples to
Thanks Seb. I've been side-tracked, but finally got round to dealing with
these comments. I've removed the misleading statement. It should appear in
the online docs in a day or two.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Sebastian Menge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAI
2008/10/16 Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> And of course, Trevor B's unique blog:
...oops; the right url being:
http://thereddoor.typepad.com/
(thanks Mats :-)
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://li
James E. Bailey wrote Monday, October 13, 2008 2:57 PM
On 13.10.2008, at 12:33, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Please correct me if I am wrong, but it seems NR 1.6 Staff notation has
never been announced as ready for public review, although it seems to be
in good shape (thanks to Till) and has been
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> James E. Bailey wrote Monday, October 13, 2008 2:57 PM
>> 3) 1.6.2.1 Everything before \startStaff & \stopStaff seems like stuff
>> from 5.3 (modifying properties). And it seems like the whole section is
>> there to in
I am translating User Manual (for LilyPond 2.10) to Japanese. And I found the
points which look like having errors.
In the example below, the first check passes without incident, since the e (in
relative mode) is within a fifth of a'. However, the second check produces a
warning, since the e is no
greetings!
i don't understand why the chord names end up below the staff when i do this:
-
\version "2.11.61"
changes = \chords {
c1 c1
}
slashes = {
\override NoteHead #'style = #'slash
b'1 b'1
}
\score {
\new Staff <<
\changes
\slashes
Jon
I just got around to doing this, but when I look at LM 4.4.2 it already
says, immediately above the examples,
"To control the placement of the fingering of a single note using this
command it is necessary to write it as a single note chord by placing angle
brackets round it."
Seems cle
Hi.
> changes = \chords {
> c1 c1
> }
>
> slashes = {
> \override NoteHead #'style = #'slash
> b'1 b'1
> }
>
> \score {
> \new Staff <<
> \changes
> \slashes
> >>
> }
>
> ---
>
> would someone be kind enough to explain?
\new Staff
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Cameron Horsburgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Next weekend I'll be attending a composing workshop organised by my
> church. One of the sessions will cover the relevant software. It seems
> the facilitator is going to be showing off Finale and Sibelius
24 matches
Mail list logo
