Stefan Thomas wrote:
Dear Paul,
I would like to have the Sixtheenth-Triplets beamed in groups of three,
altough when there is a 2/2 bar, e.g..
Ah!
I haven't taken the time to understand auto beaming rules yet. I
usually just manually beam some of the notes and the rest seem to follow
along
Well, I found a solution, but I thought, there would be an easier solution.
\version "2.12.2"
ST = #(define-music-function (parser location x) (ly:music?)
#{
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 24 * *) 1 8)
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 24 * *) 2 8)
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end
How about the following:
\version "2.12.2"
SSX = #(define-music-function (parser location x) (ly:music?)
#{
\set beamSettings = #'()
\set beatLength = #(ly:make-moment 1 8)
\set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 8 )
\times 2/3 { $x }
\unset tupletSpannerDuration
\unset beatLength
\
It happens to my scores that when using \markuplines for long texts (more
than a page), Lilypond leaves a first or a last line orphaned (single,
alone) on a page. This is normally unwanted in printed literature. Is there
a way how to instruct Lilypond not to leave orphaned or widowed single lines
Op zondag 08 november 2009 schreef David:
> Hm. Maybe ties should work at the staff level as fall-back. Or even
> just explicitly. Wouldn't it be nice to be able to say ~~ and have the
> tie work staff-level? The current voice jigglery-pokery is not
> particularly nice, and it gets worse when
Wilbert Berendsen writes:
> Agreed. Even when explicitly instantiating voices it remains necessary to use
> them for e.g. cross-voice ties. Easy cross-voice ties would be very nice, as
> they occor very often in keyboard music. This is an example that works:
>
> \layout {
> \context {
> \
Dear Mats,
thanks for Your help, but with Your code I got the file, I've attached to
this mail!
2009/11/9 Mats Bengtsson
> How about the following:
>
>
> \version "2.12.2"
> SSX = #(define-music-function (parser location x) (ly:music?)
> #{
> \set beamSettings = #'()
>
> \set beatLength = #(ly
My solution works in version 2.13, but apparently not in 2.12. However,
if you replace "beamSettings" by "autoBeamSettings" in my proposal, it
should work in version 2.12.
/Mats
Stefan Thomas wrote:
Dear Mats,
thanks for Your help, but with Your code I got the file, I've attached
to this
Please note that this problem (and the "solution" of moving the tie
engraver to the staff context) has been discussed several times before
on the mailing list, including the following threads:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-01/msg00359.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html
Yes, thanks! Now it works!
2009/11/9 Mats Bengtsson
> My solution works in version 2.13, but apparently not in 2.12. However, if
> you replace "beamSettings" by "autoBeamSettings" in my proposal, it should
> work in version 2.12.
>
> /Mats
>
> Stefan Thomas wrote:
>
>> Dear Mats,
>> thanks for
Dear Members,
a while ago I discussed with Neil (thanks again!) th alignment of the
figured-bass-items:
for illustration, see the attached examples:
_default: as it is programmed in 2.12:
here, the combination of accidentals and numbers work well, but if one uses
the accidental solely (i.e. the
I'm very new to LilyPond - using 2.12.1
I'm doing some pretty simple stuff at the moment, just for my own use. I am
trying to create a file with some very short single-instrument exercises. Each
one is only a few staves in length, so I don't want them to have a whole page
each.
Titles would be
I don't think I can offer a way to do what you're asking. I mainly want
to point out that the slash separator is working as advertised for you.
It is used in scores to make it easy to find line breaks in a large
score particularly when the number of staves changes as instruments are
removed f
Le 9 nov. 2009 à 11:10, Jiri Zurek (Prague) a écrit :
It happens to my scores that when using \markuplines for long texts
(more
than a page), Lilypond leaves a first or a last line orphaned (single,
alone) on a page. This is normally unwanted in printed literature.
Is there
a way how to in
When I install a new version I uninstall the previous one. I have
noticed, for quite a few versions now, that the uninstall takes a long
time. I just downloaded 2.13.7 and am waiting for the uninstall of
2.13.4 to complete. It has been running for about 32 minutes so far and
the uninstall progr
I've noticed a similar difference between Linux and Windows uninstall
times. My Windows machine is a few years old; 3GHz Pentium with 2Gb RAM
and the Linux box is a much older machine; 733MHz with maybe 768Mb RAM.
The uninstall on the much slower Linux hardware is a few seconds,
while on the
I have created a PDF portfolio of the the 2.13.7 English PDF
documentation (the portfolio has an embedded index that enables
searching across all the manuals at once). It can be downloaded from
http://www.users.on.net/~njpayne/music/lilydoc.pdf.
Nick
_
Patches appreciated. I don't have a clue why this happens.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 08:39:31PM +, David Bobroff wrote:
> I've noticed a similar difference between Linux and Windows uninstall
> times. My Windows machine is a few years old; 3GHz Pentium with 2Gb RAM
> and
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Nick Payne wrote:
> When I install a new version I uninstall the previous one. I have noticed,
> for quite a few versions now, that the uninstall takes a long time. I just
> downloaded 2.13.7 and am waiting for the uninstall of 2.13.4 to complete. It
> has been run
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> Patches appreciated. I don't have a clue why this happens.
It's because LilyPond uses the NSIS scons-enabled "list all installed
files, and then only remove what's been installed" mode. It would be
easier and quicker to have an non-logged
On 11/9/09 2:38 PM, "Patrick Schmidt" wrote:
> Hi Carl,
>
> I found a mistake in a predefined fret diagram (Fmaj7) and fixed it. Here is
> the patch.
Thanks for your review. I appreciate your looking at it.
Why do you consider the Fmaj7 chord in the file to be a mistake?
The chord that ex
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 10:55:41PM +0100, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> > Patches appreciated. I don't have a clue why this happens.
>
> It's because LilyPond uses the NSIS scons-enabled "list all installed
> files, and then only remove w
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> Maybe I misunderstand... windows takes 30 minutes to delete a
> known list of files?
Yes :-)
> is the installer looking at some windows database to get the
> filelist?
Nope, the registry database isn't involved at all.
> (I suppose that
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Valentin Villenave
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
>> Maybe I misunderstand... windows takes 30 minutes to delete a
>> known list of files?
>
> Yes :-)
Well, there is a list of files in files.txt, but most of those files
don't ev
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:18:14PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Graham Percival
> > wrote:
> >> Maybe I misunderstand... windows takes 30 minutes to delete a
> >> known list of files?
>
> Well, there is a list of files in files.txt, but most of those files
>
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:18:14PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Graham Percival
>> > wrote:
>> >> Maybe I misunderstand... windows takes 30 minutes to delete a
>> >> known list of files?
>>
>> Well, th
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:18:14PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>>> > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Graham Percival
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> Maybe I misunderstand... windows takes
Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:18:14PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
Maybe I misunderstand... windows takes 30 minutes to delete a
known list of
Hello,
This question is out of Lilypond, but since there're too many musicians, I'd
like to try.
Recently, I downloaded Webern's Passacaglia op.1 from IMSLP, and gave it to a
Spanish teacher to type into Finale so that I can translate it into braille.
But he stopped at p25, for p26 is anothe
On 11/9/09 5:58 PM, "Hudson Flávio Meneses Lacerda"
wrote:
> Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> While this may be syntactically valid LilyPond code, it seems to me to be
>> improper (i.e. to not match the intent of the input construction}.
>
> Hi Carl,
>
> Thanks for the correction. I have changed my c
Mats Bengtsson ee.kth.se> writes:
> push = \markup{ \override #'(font-size . 0) \musicglyph #"scripts.upbow" }
>
I like it!
I always thought the upbow was too big in comparison to the downbow,
plus the articulation is now drawn above the fingering, not below it.
___
why would a
\cadenzaOn
c16^"Solo Free Time" d ef f g2. as4 gs g32 gs g8~ g1 g4 f16 ef d f d
ef c4 ef8 c16 d g,1 \bar "" c16 d ef f g2 g \glissando g' g16 f ef d c b
a g f e d c4 b2 e b16 e b1 \bar "||"
\cadenzaOff
cause a bar check failure?
I've removed the \bar "" bits, but then th
Nicolas Sceaux writes:
> Le 9 nov. 2009 à 11:10, Jiri Zurek (Prague) a écrit :
>
>>
>> It happens to my scores that when using \markuplines for long texts
>> (more
>> than a page), Lilypond leaves a first or a last line orphaned (single,
>> alone) on a page. This is normally unwanted in printed
>
Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 11/9/09 5:58 PM, "Hudson Flávio Meneses Lacerda"
>>
>> BTW, I have found a strange behaviour of "modern" accidentals rule:
>> LilyPond considers volta alternatives as "previous" measure. Is this
>> correct? (Note the natural sign at the 2nd and 3rd alternatives, not
>>
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Nick Payne wrote:
> Patrick McCarty wrote:
>>
>> I should have said "about half" of the files. Most (if not all) of
>> the nonexistent files are supposed to be in the "\usr\docs\"
>> hierarchy. The directory structure exists, but the files aren't
>> there.
>
> Yes
35 matches
Mail list logo
