On 7 May 2010 22:36, Ossie Wilson Snr wrote:
> I tried this code from the Notation manual.
>
> \once \override Glissando #'(bound-details right Y) = #-2
>
> Which can be used to alter the left end by substituting left for right.
That just changes the angle of the line, so you'll still be left wi
-Original Message-
Xavier Scheuer said
>I am completely ignorant about that too.
>But according to the doc (internals) the #'bound-details value should
>be in the form:
>#'((right (attach-dir . 0) (padding . 1.5)) (left (attach-dir . 0)
>(padding . 1.5)))
>Which code did you try actu
Le 5 mai 2010 à 14:25, Bernardo Barros a écrit :
> 1. Is there an easy way to hack Lyqi to i and e increase and lower a
> quarter tone instead of half step? I'm looking at the file
> lyqi-mode.el to figure out if it is easy of not.
>
> 2. Impossible to use MIDI in OSX?
Huh, actually I've rewritt
2010/5/7 josé henrique padovani :
> Hi..
> I have made some changes on my lilypond-mode.el (for emacs) to
> process .lytex files with the commands...
>
> lilypond-book --pdf yourfile.lytex
> pdflatex yourfile.tex
>
> I would like to know who maintains lilypond-mode and how can I help
> to add the
searchfgold wrote:
>
> I did that and it didn't work, but then I used \bookpart as well it it
> worked smoothly again after a few ... lilypond crashes.
>
i have tried
\book {
\bookpart {
\score {
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff = "upper" <<
\new Voice { \upperVoice
Hi..
I have made some changes on my lilypond-mode.el (for emacs) to process
.lytex files with the commands...
lilypond-book --pdf yourfile.lytex
pdflatex yourfile.tex
I would like to know who maintains lilypond-mode and how can I help to
add these commands to the sources?
(I was having pro
2010/5/7 Ossie Wilson Snr :
>
> [...]
>
> I have been using cross headed notes, arpeggios (with hidden notes),
> zigzag glissandos (also with hidden notes) etc to show these effects.
> However, I have struck a few problems.
>
>
> 1) I would like to be able to vary the width and
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 16:39:49 +1000
> From: "Ossie Wilson Snr"
> Subject: Re:Glissandos
> To:
> Message-ID: <000301caedb0$17578880$0202a...@grandpa>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> My daughter is arranging a simple song to be sung by primary school
children
I did that and it didn't work, but then I used \bookpart as well it it worked
smoothly again after a few ... lilypond crashes.
-Eluze wrote:
>
> have a look at
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation-big-page#Titles-and-headers
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notati
Anyway, if Fomus will be mentioned it is important to state there it
*IS* being actively developed...
josé
Em 07/05/10 11:13, Graham Percival escreveu:
Hi all,
Colin Campbell has been working with me on the Introduction of the
new website. However, we're still debating what to do with the
"E
How about a HTML table: Row per tool, significant attributes per
column? Attributes would include things like "GUI", "TEXT MODE", "TOOL
MATURITY", "FEATURES", and a link to a fuller description and additional
link in the description to where to get the tool. Descriptions include
constraints, equip
One solution would be ask if the new user have experience in this
respect? So it will be redirect to one of two different pages: one for
each case.
On 7 May 2010 12:18, Bernardo Barros wrote:
> For a user inexperienced new Lilypond user in programming (deal with
> text and editors) I think he/she
For a user inexperienced new Lilypond user in programming (deal with
text and editors) I think he/she should make contact as fast as
possible with something like LilyPondTool. In this respect I think
this way should be as easy as possible for this type of new user.
Later he/she can choose a differe
Yeah, that's right. One page is better. But the order is important.
Also describing how "easy" or "difficult" a method is.
On 7 May 2010 11:59, Hugh Myers wrote:
> A somewhat pragmatic approach would be to use a single page suitably
> subdivided if no scrolling is involved. Else use a two page so
A somewhat pragmatic approach would be to use a single page suitably
subdivided if no scrolling is involved. Else use a two page solution.
The fewer pages a user has to link to the faster that person finds
what they are looking for.
--hsm
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
>
Hi all,
Colin Campbell has been working with me on the Introduction of the
new website. However, we're still debating what to do with the
"Easier editing" page:
http://lilypond.org/website/easier-editing.html
In particular, should we:
1) list all programs that help or produce lilypond inpu
If you please send some example code of what you tried, it's much easier
for us on the mailing list to provide relevant answers to your questions.
(Don't forget to press "Reply All", so that the followup is sent to the
mailing list when you do that)
/Mats
Ossie Wilson Snr wrote:
My daughter
My daughter is arranging a simple song to be sung by primary school children
in an eisteddfod in the next few weeks and I am trying to typeset her
arrangement in LP (2.12.2 on WINDOWS XP). There are non lyric passages where
vocal sounds are used to indicate city noises, forest noises and ocean
noi
18 matches
Mail list logo
