Jay
-Original Message-
From: Jay Anderson
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 22:53:34 -0700
To: "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
Subject: Re: Multi-measure rest with measure numbers
>On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Jay Anderson
>wrote:
>> Essentially, I want to write R1*10 and have it be equivalent to
>>
hi,
maybe I'm missing something. I did not try your solution, but I suppose it
works fine. but how would you append lyrics? \addlyrics gives a syntax error
(unexpected \addlyrics), and \lyricsto requires different named voice
contexts in which I could not get your solution to work.
Cheers
Jürgen
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Jay Anderson wrote:
> Essentially, I want to write R1*10 and have it be equivalent to
> writing something like R1*10_"[101-110]".
I've gone in and modified multi-measure-rest-engraver.cc to roughly do
what I want. I couldn't figure out how to do it with a separate
Undoubtedly, this is a simple request for those who understand Scheme...
How can I change the lyric extender from a solid line to a dotted one?
Nothing in the LSR or manuals discusses this.
Thanks,
Robert
www.bostonsing.org
___
lilypond-user mailing li
Hello,
I'm writing my second orchestral work. There's a place two systems having
different height, one low and wthe other high with more instruments. Lilypond
always tries to include all two on one page, and therefore generates "couldn't
fit music on page". I have to use manual break, but can
On 22 January 2011 20:07, James Bailey wrote:
>
> I haven't checked it, but they're probably in different voice contexts.
> Possible explicity doing a \new Voice = first and \context Voice = first
> where appropriate may solve the problem.
Yes, or simply putting all in a \new Voice works:
\ver
According to the book "Ornamentation in baroque and post-baroque
music" it is an English sign (apparently many traveling musicians from
the continent picked up its use) that can variously be interpreted as
a mordent or trill so you will have to work out from context which
sounds better for each ins
2011/1/23 Xavier Scheuer :
> On 23 January 2011 23:09, Joseph Haig wrote:
>> {
>> \time 4/4
>> aes'1( a')
>> aes'~ aes'
>> aes'( aes')
>> }
>>
>> I believe that the first and third ties are displayed incorrectly.
>> Specifically, the first tie should have a natural in front of the
>>
2011/1/23 Nils Gey :
> Hey people,
Hi man! :)
> I have vocal pieces which have all fermatas in all voices
> so that I can print each voice alone.
> But for a reduction to a 2-staff system I only want
> the Soprano and Bass fermata visible
> (top first and bottom of second staff) but not the inner
On 23 January 2011 23:09, Joseph Haig wrote:
>
> I have (I believe) found a bug in Lilypond, and I am fairly sure what
> it is, but I would like to check with people who have better knowledge
> of music theory than I before I submit it to the bug list. In the
> following code:
>
> {
>\time 4/
On Jan 23, 2011, at 11:09 PM, Joseph Haig wrote:
> I have (I believe) found a bug in Lilypond, and I am fairly sure what
> it is, but I would like to check with people who have better knowledge
> of music theory than I before I submit it to the bug list. In the
> following code:
>
> {
>\tim
2011/1/23 Joseph Haig :
> I have (I believe) found a bug in Lilypond, and I am fairly sure what
> it is, but I would like to check with people who have better knowledge
> of music theory than I before I submit it to the bug list. In the
> following code:
>
> {
> \time 4/4
> aes'1( a')
> a
I have (I believe) found a bug in Lilypond, and I am fairly sure what
it is, but I would like to check with people who have better knowledge
of music theory than I before I submit it to the bug list. In the
following code:
{
\time 4/4
aes'1( a')
aes'~ aes'
aes'( aes')
}
I beli
2011/1/23 Jan-Peter Voigt :
> Hello and thank you Jakob, hello list,
>
> this piece is a great work. It compiles well in 2.13(.47 lilybuntu) and adds
> a very useful function to lily!
> The .ly is attached again, because I think it is good to have it on the
> devel-list.
> I would like to add it
Hello and thank you Jakob, hello list,
this piece is a great work. It compiles well in 2.13(.47 lilybuntu) and adds a
very useful function to lily!
The .ly is attached again, because I think it is good to have it on the
devel-list.
I would like to add it to LSR to have it in the main distro once
Hey people,
I have vocal pieces which have all fermatas in all voices so that I can print
each voice alone. But for a reduction to a 2-staff system I only want the
Soprano and Bass fermata visible (top first and bottom of second staff) but not
the inner ones.
Do you know a way to do that? I cur
On Jan 23, 2011, at 6:21 AM, Patrick Schmidt wrote:
> nice work! I just think that the name modal transposition is a little
> misleading in this case. At first I thought that I could change the mode of a
> tune with your function e.g. transpose music from c\major to c\minor or
> something like
Hello,
-Original Message-
From: Phil Holmes
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 13:30:50 +
To: James Lowe , "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
Subject: Re: Merging Rests in Single Staff with more than one 'voice'
>- Original Message -
>From: "James Lowe"
>To:
>Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 5:5
>> The source is the Performers' Facsimiles edition of Dix Sonates by
>> Godfrey Finger.
>
> May be a trill judging from the commentary in the "Ornaments"
> article in Grove's and the chart at the end of the article. But in
> that source and in "The New Harvard Dictionary of Music," these
> pair
Laura Conrad wrote:
> I'm transcribing a flute sonata from an eighteenth centuray facsimile,
> and there's a decoration that I don't know either what it means (so that
> I could translate it into an equivalent modern articulation mark), or
> how to produce something that looks like that in lilypon
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Patrick Schmidt wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> nice work! I just think that the name modal transposition is a little
> misleading in this case.
Thanks, Patrick! I agree that the name may be confusing. I considered
calling it something like \scalarImitation, since that'
- Original Message -
From: "James Lowe"
To:
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 5:52 PM
Subject: Merging Rests in Single Staff with more than one 'voice'
Hello,
I don't often use multiple voices in a single staff, so am a bit
unfamiliar and am still finding my way.
However I cannot ea
oops, forgot to reply to list (sorry about the extra spam Jan-Peter)
2011/1/23 jakob lund :
> Hi again
>
> After fiddling some more with this, I came up with a simple solution.
> Instead of a string, a LineBreakEvent is inserted into the lyric --
> neither \lyricmode or \addlyrics complain about t
You can try this:
\musicSourceOne = { a4 b c d | a1\rest | a4 r b r2 }
\musicSourceTwo = { f4 r f r | s1 | f4 f g r2 }
---
Frank
>2011/1/22 David Raleigh Arnold :
>> On Saturday 22 January 2011 12:52:54 James Lowe wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I don't often use multiple voices in a single staff, so
2011/1/23 Ben Luo :
> Dear James,
>
> I translated priority 1 files to Chinese. How can I submit to key
> person? I can not find the way.
Send them to me, I'll tell you if anything is missing.
And please, learn how to make patches soon.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.cs
Dear James,
I translated priority 1 files to Chinese. How can I submit to key
person? I can not find the way.
Best regards,
Ben Luo
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 6:44 PM, James Lowe wrote:
> Ben,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
>> [mailt
Hi Michael,
nice work! I just think that the name modal transposition is a little
misleading in this case. At first I thought that I could change the
mode of a tune with your function e.g. transpose music from c\major
to c\minor or something like that.
I just had the idea that it might be u
Hi,
you may tie the e note in partOne to a e1*0 note, like this:
partOne = \relative c' {
c4 e g e~ e1*0
}
I did not yet understand why this works, but it does, even in more complex
situations like ties across voices. Note that the e1*0 note must have the
same value as the e1 note in partTw
On 23 January 2011 05:21, Michael Dykes wrote:
>
> I am trying to fit some markups in my score, and would like for all of them
> to be on the same "line". Is there a way (without shortening the markups) to
> "widen" the first measure, or put padding between the first two notes of the
> score. Than
29 matches
Mail list logo
