Maybe a simple question: Is there a way to flatten the curve of a tie that is
as easy as overriding "ratio" for slurs?
I found "control-points" and this does change the tie's shape. But, I don't
need to modify the x-extent, only the y-extent. It looks to me as if overriding
the control points m
Unfortunately I didn't find the property that controls the line
separating the footnote. from the score.
Is this possible?
is it documented (and I am blind)?
or is this impossible?
Well not easy to find.
In paper-defaults-init.ly, you have some variable controlling Footnotes.
By default, the
Hello,
I have 70 pieces with ties and slurs here. They are already in Lilypond
with the correct syntax.
Now my publisher says he wants that ties look like slurs.
I couldn't disagree more but I have no choice here.
Any suggestions how make the ties look like slurs without changing them
all manua
Hi James,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 3:32 AM, James Harkins wrote:
> Maybe a simple question: Is there a way to flatten the curve of a tie that
> is as easy as overriding "ratio" for slurs?
You can override 'ratio for ties too:
\override Tie #'details #'ratio = #0.2
Another possibility is to o
Hi,
Oops--should have included the version. I'm using 2.15.37. With 2.14.2
and before you need the dollar sign:
>
> shapeTie =
> #(define-music-function (parser location offsets) (list?)
> #{
>\once \override Tie #'control-points = #(alter-curve $offsets)
> #})
>
>
-David
___
Sorry about this long snippet. The \break seems not working all the times. I
am puzzled - if I don't use both "\include and its content" the \break works as
intended. There must have some coding inside the \include that make the \break
not behave as intended. Help appreciated.
% {
\version "
Hi James,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:58 AM, James Worlton wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:18 AM, James Worlton
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:59 AM, James wrote:
> >> James
> >>
> >> On 13 April 2012 16:30, James Worlton wrote:
> >>> I've found some odd tie behavior--not sure if i
Hi,
> Your override clears 'details except for 'ratio.
>
Err...don't think that's accurate, but the rest stands!
-David
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
You can over-ride automatic breaking with
\override NonMusicalPaperColumn #'line-break-permission = ##f
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: MING TSANG
To: lilypond-usermailinglist
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 2:40 PM
Subject: \break not working properly
Sorry about
Hi, Phil:
I try to put \override NonMusicalPaperColumn #'line-break-permission =
##f
in \paper and it doesn't produce as intended - it
breaks with extra break before the \break.
Then I try to put the code inside the \relative c' { } and it doe snot
work either.
Hi, Phil:
After I send the following email, I play around with some lilypond code. If I
remove the syspem-per-page = 6 the \break breaks at the intended place. The
same is true if I use sysrem-per-page = 0. I have no idea and don't
understand. Any help is appreciated.
Blessing in+,
Min
Given
\relative c' {
r2 r4 r8 c8 ~ |
\repeat volta 2 {
c4 c c c |
}
\alternative {
{ r2 r4 r8 c8 ~ | }
{ c4 c c c | }
}
}
The last note of the first alternative should have a tie, but it should
not be tied to the next note. If the next note were not a 'c', an error
message w
Hi Gilles,
thank you very much. Looks very promising.
Best
Urs
Am 20.04.2012 10:43, schrieb Gilles:
Unfortunately I didn't find the property that controls the line
separating the footnote. from the score.
Is this possible?
is it documented (and I am blind)?
or is this impossible?
Well not
Johan Vromans wrote Friday, April 20, 2012 9:22 PM
\relative c' {
r2 r4 r8 c8 ~ |
\repeat volta 2 {
c4 c c c |
}
\alternative {
{ r2 r4 r8 c8 ~ | }
{ c4 c c c | }
}
}
The last note of the first alternative should have a tie, but it should
not be tied to the next note. If the nex
David Nalesnik writes:
> Hi,
>
> Oops--should have included the version. I'm using 2.15.37. With
> 2.14.2 and before you need the dollar sign:
High time we get 2.16 out.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https:
I just found, to my amusement, some interviews
http://datenkanal.org/archives/20-DK5-Chemnitzer-Linux-Tage-2012.html>
(in German) about the Chemnitzer Linuxtage, and around 00:45:00 or so my
LilyPond talk is mentioned in an interview with Klaus Höppner, the
treasurer of the German TeX user group D
I need the following layout:
[image: Immagine in linea 2]
The result is a copy and paste from 2 .ly.
The little up-right staff uses: *#(set-global-staff-size 11)* ;
the rest uses: *#(set-global-staff-size 20)* .
The command: *#(layout-set-staff-size 11)*
in the \layout section gives a not valid re
Hi,
you've used a bad \layout
Try to replace it with:
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\override NonMusicalPaperColumn #'line-break-permission = ##f
}
\context {
\Staff
\override VerticalAxisGroup #'remove-first = ##t
\RemoveEmptyStaves
\consists \Ez_nu
Hi Thomas,
I replace the layout code for my original one and the result is good. It
breaks at the \break. However, I use the same layout code from your email and
replaces my layout from another .ly code and the second \break does not break.
Please refer to long snippet. Sorry about the long
Hi Silvio,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Silvio ARDITO wrote:
> I need the following layout:
>
> [image: Immagine in linea 2]
> The result is a copy and paste from 2 .ly.
> The little up-right staff uses: *#(set-global-staff-size 11)* ;
> the rest uses: *#(set-global-staff-size 20)* .
> The c
Hi,
> Also, take a look at this snippet:
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/snippets/staff-notation
>
>
That would be the one called "Changing the staff size"...!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mail
Hi,
there was a typo in
%{bar01-05%} r4 c4 f4 a4 | g4. c,8. d4 e4 | f4 d4 c2~ | c4 c4 4
4 | a4. g8 \bar""\mbk
Second bar: c,8.
Remove the dot and it works.
BTW, your file didn't compile at the first time. You had commented a
"}" (closing the header) by accident.
Cheers,
Harm
___
Thank you Thomas. It works. I missed bar check in jedit. Is barcheck
available in Fredcobaldi? If so, how to set it.
Blessing in+,
Ming.
>
> From: Thomas Morley
>To: MING TSANG
>Cc: Phil Holmes ; lilypond-usermailinglist
>
>Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 4
At Fri, 20 Apr 2012 06:31:20 -0500,
David Nalesnik wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 3:32 AM, James Harkins wrote:
>
> Maybe a simple question: Is there a way to flatten the curve of a tie
> that is as easy as
> overriding "ratio" for slurs?
>
> You can override 'ratio for
24 matches
Mail list logo
