Dear Urs,
I think what Colin meant by build token is another strategy to archieve
the same as what I described with checkin/merge to the main branch and
personal development branches. I think he has in mind a decentralized
version control tool, where you first work with your local version,
Dear Susan,
I think this makes sense (although I can't tell if it really is what
Colin wanted to express ...).
Do I understand correctly that what you describe is one possible
strategy to take care of the integrity of the main source tree?
And another one would be what I have the impression
Hi Urs,
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 01:42:14AM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 22.05.2012 00:53, schrieb Colin Hall:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:13:54PM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
In the meantime I had already decided to go this way for the next
projects. Our current project that we organize with a
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:26:02AM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Dear Susan,
I think this makes sense (although I can't tell if it really is what
Colin wanted to express ...).
It was pretty close. Thanks, Susan, you write well.
Do I understand correctly that what you describe is one possible
Hi Colin,
thanks for your patience. I somehow start to see some light ;-)
Am 22.05.2012 10:53, schrieb Colin Hall:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:26:02AM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Dear Susan,
I think this makes sense (although I can't tell if it really is what
Colin wanted to express ...).
It was
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:23:34AM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
thanks for your patience. I somehow start to see some light ;-)
Good!
Am 22.05.2012 10:53, schrieb Colin Hall:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:26:02AM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Do I understand correctly that what you describe is one
If we'd use the 'build token' concept (be it through empty emails or
'lock files') then we're basically where we are right now (with a shared
folder): tell the others which file I'm going to edit and ask them to
leave this alone for a while.
It looks similar, but there are big differences!
Hi again,
I'm attaching a revised version which works with 2.15.38 which you'll want
to use instead. (It won't work with 2.14.2.) It's somewhat simplified.
One thing that you can do with it is change the distance of the number
from the beam by overriding TupletBracket #'padding (yes,
Hi David N,
Recently we experienced strange crashes in our Lilypond scores that could only
be avoided by randomly changing the order of some function calls.
Now I sat down and pinned it down quite narrowly:
If I use your wonderful \shape function and afterwards override any property of
the
Hi Urs,
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de wrote:
Hi David N,
Recently we experienced strange crashes in our Lilypond scores that could
only be avoided by randomly changing the order of some function calls.
Now I sat down and pinned it down quite narrowly:
If I
On 05/22/2012 12:47 AM, lilyp...@umpquanet.com wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 05:51:25PM +0200, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Hi,
What is the status of this?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-11/msg00285.html
What do you mean by 'status'? It works for me. I've tweaked the
On 5/22/12 16:53 , rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 05/22/2012 12:47 AM, lilyp...@umpquanet.com wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 05:51:25PM +0200, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Hi,
What is the status of this?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-11/msg00285.html
What do you mean by
Hi,
I have an example where 2.15.38 does a worse job than 2.14.2 at
placing a TupletNumber.
I suspect it's related to a forced \stemUp, because the number might
be in the right place if the stem were going down.
How should I submit my example ... in email here? In an issue reporter?
On 05/22/2012 04:57 PM, Choan Gálvez wrote:
On 5/22/12 16:53 , rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 05/22/2012 12:47 AM, lilyp...@umpquanet.com wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 05:51:25PM +0200, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Hi,
What is the status of this?
Hi again,
The problem happens when the variable function attempts to look up the
procedure for 'control-points. Each override you do is tacked onto the
front of the alist and so the key we're looking for-- 'control-points -- is
pushed further back. You can see what I mean by changing cdr in
On 05/22/2012 04:57 PM, Choan Gálvez wrote:
On 5/22/12 16:53 , rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 05/22/2012 12:47 AM, lilyp...@umpquanet.com wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 05:51:25PM +0200, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Hi,
What is the status of this?
Thank you very much!
Seems to work perfectly (so far - until we find something new ;-) )
Best
Urs
Am 22.05.2012 17:28, schrieb David Nalesnik:
Hi again,
The problem happens when the variable function attempts to look
up the procedure for 'control-points. Each override you do is
Dear Susan,
thank you very much for taking so much of your valuable time.
It's astonishing - like reading a good book, but one written with my
specific questions in mind :-)
Well basically everything really is very much what I had expected it to be.
What I will have to see in action before
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de wrote:
What I will have to see in action before really being able to believe it
works in 'real life' is the merging of text files that have been changed by
more than one person. Of course it's clear that it _must_ work (everything
John David Duncan-3 wrote:
Hi,
I have an example where 2.15.38 does a worse job than 2.14.2 at
placing a TupletNumber.
I suspect it's related to a forced \stemUp, because the number might
be in the right place if the stem were going down.
How should I submit my example ... in
Never before in the history of The LilyPond Report so many new editors
appeared in so short a time! This month Pavel Roskin joins us to tell
a story of wit and patience about a brave contributor who sets out on
a quest to find the cause of strange LilyPond errors appearing out of
nowhere.
In
Am 22.05.2012 01:49, schrieb Jonghyun Kim:
Dear List,
How to do the \autochange between the treble^8 and treble?
Default setting is treble and bass Clefs, but I want to modify that.
I want to display that: (download link)
22 matches
Mail list logo
