Javier Ruiz-Alma address@hidden writes:
I need to place markup between the staves, best centered at the
barline.
How is this accomplished?
%%% BEGIN LILY CODE SNIPPET
\version 2.16.1
\new staff {
c''1
\mark \markup{
\override #'(baseline-skip . 1.5)
\abs-fontsize #10
\column{
\halign
Javier Ruiz-Alma jav...@ruiz-alma.com writes:
Javier Ruiz-Alma address@hidden writes:
I need to place markup between the staves, best centered at the
barline.
How is this accomplished?
%%% BEGIN LILY CODE SNIPPET
\version 2.16.1
\new staff {
c''1
\mark \markup{
\override
Hi everybody,
I've created a new context using slightly changing the example given
in
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/defining-new-contexts
The code works in principle - however, I get a warning rhythmic head is
not part of a rhythmic column for each note within that
David Kastrup wrote
Noeck lt;
noeck.marburg@
gt; writes:
Or, just as a slight variation: if you want to minimize the code needed
within the music, you can put the override in the command:
breatheFermata = {
\once \override BreathingSign.text = \markup {
\combine
\musicglyph
Alas none of the proposed solutions work
version 2.16.1
here's the logs
Joram's solution
breathe test.ly:31:41: error: syntax error, unexpected '=', expecting
SCM_FUNCTION or SCM_IDENTIFIER or SCM_TOKEN
c c \once \override BreathingSign.text
= \markup \breatheFermata \breathe
Eluze's
Jay Hamilton-3 wrote
Alas none of the proposed solutions work
in pre-2.17.6 (?) versions you must write
\override BreathingSign #'text = \markup \breatheFermata \breathe
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
Jay,
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Jay Hamilton i...@soundand.com wrote:
Alas none of the proposed solutions work
version 2.16.1
here's the logs
Joram's solution
breathe test.ly:31:41: error: syntax error, unexpected '=', expecting
SCM_FUNCTION or SCM_IDENTIFIER or SCM_TOKEN
c c
2013/2/17 Jay Hamilton i...@soundand.com:
Alas none of the proposed solutions work
version 2.16.1
here's the logs
Hi Jay,
all proposals are working - with 2.17
Please, _*always*_ mention your version!!
For 2.16. use:
breatheFermataE = \markup {
\combine
\musicglyph #scripts.rcomma
Am 17.02.2013 16:05, schrieb Jay Hamilton:
Alas none of the proposed solutions work
version 2.16.1
here's the logs
Joram's solution
breathe test.ly:31:41: error: syntax error, unexpected '=', expecting
SCM_FUNCTION or SCM_IDENTIFIER or SCM_TOKEN
c c \once \override
4 answers within 2 minutes :)
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Il 17/02/2013 13:10, Javier Ruiz-Alma ha scritto:
I found an accidental notation rule in 1803 music introductory
textbook by M. Clementi, says accidental was also omitted on the
following bar it when happened to be first note played of same pitch
as prior bar accidental (explicit example shown
Am 17.02.2013 04:09, schrieb David Kastrup:
Remove the Fingering_engraver, _and_ add a dummy engraver listening to
fingering events and ignoring them. Then New_fingering_engraver will
not feel compelled taking over.
Ok, there seems to be a reason for this behaviour and a way to deal with
Hi all,
while writing this graphical list of objects and engravers:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-01/msg00916.html
I wondered, how some engravers are used and how some objects are
produced. Most names are self explaining, but I had some difficulty the
following things:
Noeck noeck.marb...@gmx.de writes:
Am 17.02.2013 04:09, schrieb David Kastrup:
Remove the Fingering_engraver, _and_ add a dummy engraver listening to
fingering events and ignoring them. Then New_fingering_engraver will
not feel compelled taking over.
Ok, there seems to be a reason for
On 02/17/2013 01:10 PM, Javier Ruiz-Alma wrote:
I found an accidental notation rule in 1803 music introductory textbook by M.
Clementi, says accidental was also omitted on the following bar it when happened
to be first note played of same pitch as prior bar accidental (explicit example
shown
On 02/17/2013 04:48 PM, Luca Rossetto Casel wrote:
In present editions, this notation is generally uniformed to the modern one -
eventually putting the added alterations in parentheses or brackets.
Is this really a case where brackets would be used? The typical reason for
inserting a
I'm creating a simple note exercise for guitar students (see below).
I have 3 problems:
1. The lyric underscores are too close to the low E so there is no room to
write the note name. How do I add extra padding (spacing) between the staff
and the lyrics?
2. How do I tweak the vocalName
pabuhr wrote
I'm creating a simple note exercise for guitar students (see below).
I have 3 problems:
1. The lyric underscores are too close to the low E so there is no room to
write the note name. How do I add extra padding (spacing) between the
staff
and the lyrics?
\layout {
1. The lyric underscores are too close to the low E so there is no room to
write the note name. How do I add extra padding (spacing) between the
staff
and the lyrics?
Try :
\lyricsto one \new Lyrics \with {
\override VerticalAxisGroup #'nonstaff-relatedstaff-spacing =
pabuhr wrote
2. How do I tweak the vocalName under the treble clef rather than have
it
outside the staff lines?
instead of using shortVocalName … you could also use stanzas:
\set stanza = Note \repeat unfold 6 {\markup \combine \with-color #white
| _ }
this combining seems necessary to
instead of using shortVocalName ... you could also use stanzas:
Perfect! I should have seen stanza, but missed it.
So below is the result. I tried to create a macro, Fred, to replace the many
repeated lines, but was unsuccessful. Suggestions on how to make it work?
Thanks.
2013/2/18 pabuhr pab...@fastmail.fm:
I tried to create a macro, Fred, to replace the many
repeated lines, but was unsuccessful. Suggestions on how to make it work?
Quit concise:
\version 2.16.1
underscore =
\markup \combine \with-color #white | _
Fred =
#(define-music-function (parser
Il 17/02/2013 19:10, Joseph Rushton Wakeling ha scritto:
On 02/17/2013 04:48 PM, Luca Rossetto Casel wrote:
In present editions, this notation is generally uniformed to the
modern one -
eventually putting the added alterations in parentheses or brackets.
Is this really a case where brackets
All,
After an hour reading through the user guides and the internal reference I
had thought that this would disable the dashed line that follows the
/ottava:
code
flute = {
\key e \minor
\global
% Music follows here.
\ottava #1
\override Staff.OttavaBracket #'dash-fraction = #0.0
gs''2
Thanks to all trying to help the forgetful.
The # did not solve the problem--- what it did do was allow the file to
compile without the fermata - so just the breath mark.
The longer solution i.e. Mr. Morley's does work both of them-
so now I'm wondering is there a way to make this a global
Hi Guy,
some hints for you:
1) You should send code that actually compiles. For your example
\language english is missing and your global definitions are unknown
(and probably not necessary).
http://lilypond.org/website/tiny-examples.html
2) What you want is probably:
\override
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Noeck noeck.marb...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Guy,
some hints for you:
1) You should send code that actually compiles. For your example
\language english is missing and your global definitions are unknown
(and probably not necessary).
Am 18.02.2013 07:07, schrieb Nathan:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Noeck noeck.marb...@gmx.de
mailto:noeck.marb...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Guy,
some hints for you:
1) You should send code that actually compiles. For your example
\language english is missing and your
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Guy Stalnaker jimmyg...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
After an hour reading through the user guides and the internal reference I
had thought that this would disable the dashed line that follows the
/ottava:
code
flute = {
\key e \minor
\global
% Music
29 matches
Mail list logo
