Robert Honore wrote Friday, August 02, 2013 12:00 AM
>> On 02/08/13 05:49, Robert Honore wrote:
>>> Even if I try to double-click on the lilypond icon right now, the result
>>> I get is that the lilypond executable appears to start, and then it
>>> seems to just sit there. Then I would use the t
On 01/08/2013 13:33, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Robert"
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 6:05 PM
> Subject: anyone got lilypond 2.16.2 to work on Windows Vista?
>
>
>> I have Windows Vista Version 6.0.6002 Service Pack 2 Build 6002.
>>
>> I installed Lilypon
I will try later
That's what a quick googling showed up for me too.
Cheers, jp
Am 01.08.2013 um 15:40 schrieb David Kastrup :
> Jan-Peter Voigt writes:
>
>> Hi Kieren,
>>
>> I did some checks on the absolute font-sizes:
>> - If you do a stencil-add on a stencil created via
>> grob-interpret-ma
On 01/08/2013 19:15, Urs Liska wrote:
> From what you wrote about lilypond --version I don't think the problem
> lies there. But it's probably a good idea to send the file anyway.
>
> Urs
Ok. What's the procedure for sending the file?
Yours sincerely,
Robert Honoré.
__
>From what you wrote about lilypond --version I don't think the problem lies
>there. But it's probably a good idea to send the file anyway.
Urs
Robert Honore schrieb:
>Urs Liska wrote:
>
>> Do you have an input file?
>> What is in the source code window when you click "engrave" in
>Frescobal
Urs Liska wrote:
> Do you have an input file?
> What is in the source code window when you click "engrave" in Frescobaldi?
Yes, I have an input file that I had processed successfully before. In
the source code window of Frescobaldi, I have the text of that file
visible. You want me to send that
Nick Payne wrote:
> On 02/08/13 05:49, Robert Honore wrote:
>> Even if I try to double-click on the lilypond icon right now, the result
>> I get is that the lilypond executable appears to start, and then it
>> seems to just sit there. Then I would use the task manager to see if
>> the executable
Hi David,
thank you for the organisation.
I could and should have written earlier, but unfortunately I can't
attend this meeting.
I really would love joining the discussions, and above all have the
opportunity to meet some of you in person.
But unfortunately it is within exactly the two weeks t
On 02/08/13 05:49, Robert Honore wrote:
Even if I try to double-click on the lilypond icon right now, the result
I get is that the lilypond executable appears to start, and then it
seems to just sit there. Then I would use the task manager to see if
the executable ran at all, and I would find (
Am 01.08.2013 21:49, schrieb Robert Honore:
On 01/08/2013 15:15, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Robert Honore"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 7:25 PM
Subject: Re: anyone got lilypond 2.16.2 to work on Windows Vista?
On 01/08/2013 13:33, Phil H
On 01/08/2013 15:15, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Robert Honore"
>
> To: "Phil Holmes"
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 7:25 PM
> Subject: Re: anyone got lilypond 2.16.2 to work on Windows Vista?
>
>
>> On 01/08/2013 13:33, Phil Holmes wrote:
>>> - Origin
Zitat von Phil Holmes :
- Original Message - From: "Robert Honore"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 7:25 PM
Subject: Re: anyone got lilypond 2.16.2 to work on Windows Vista?
On 01/08/2013 13:33, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Robert"
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Honore"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 7:25 PM
Subject: Re: anyone got lilypond 2.16.2 to work on Windows Vista?
On 01/08/2013 13:33, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Robert"
To:
Sent: Thursday, Augus
- Original Message -
From: "Robert"
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 6:05 PM
Subject: anyone got lilypond 2.16.2 to work on Windows Vista?
I have Windows Vista Version 6.0.6002 Service Pack 2 Build 6002.
I installed Lilypond 2.16.2 and I have since been unable to get Lilypond
to
I have Windows Vista Version6.0.6002 Service Pack 2 Build 6002.
I installed Lilypond 2.16.2 and I have since been unable to get Lilypond to
run successfully. Whenever I start Lilypond, the executable appears to start
up, but does not apparently make any progress. It just sits there after
Jan-Peter Voigt writes:
>> Am 01.08.2013 um 15:40 schrieb:
>>>
>>> Does the patch in
>>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3483> help?
>>
>> --
>> David Kastrup
>
>
> I will try later
> That's what a quick googling showed up for me too.
I would not exactly claim that my knowl
Hi,
Blame it on late-night craziness… =\
I just did another test with staff sizes 8 and 80, and the fonts do seem to be
absolute(ly the same).
Sorry for the noise.
Please confirm currency for bounty.
Thanks,
Kieren.
On 2013-Aug-1, at 09:21, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote:
> Hi Kieren,
>
> I did som
... maybe this is related to this issue:
https://codereview.appspot.com/12242043/
Am 01.08.2013 15:21, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
Hi Kieren,
I did some checks on the absolute font-sizes:
- If you do a stencil-add on a stencil created via
grob-interpret-markup and interpret-markup inside a normal
Jan-Peter Voigt writes:
> Hi Kieren,
>
> I did some checks on the absolute font-sizes:
> - If you do a stencil-add on a stencil created via
> grob-interpret-markup and interpret-markup inside a normal markup,
> they exactly match-
> - If you do a pixel by pixel compare (I did in gimp) a Lyric mar
Hi Kieren,
I did some checks on the absolute font-sizes:
- If you do a stencil-add on a stencil created via grob-interpret-markup
and interpret-markup inside a normal markup, they exactly match-
- If you do a pixel by pixel compare (I did in gimp) a Lyric markup with
an abs-font-size with diffe
Am 01.08.2013 15:01, schrieb Urs Liska:
I could imagine declaring a specific lilypond layer as a pdf layer at the top
of the file and later look for elements of this layer.
That way I would be responsible myself and by default there wouldn't be any
matching inconcistencies.
Something like
#(se
Jan-Peter Voigt schrieb:
>Am 01.08.2013 11:07, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
>> isn't the layer grob property what you want?
>no, it isn't ...
>but if one comes up with the right pdfmark ps command, there has to be
>a
>check of this layer property to avoid inconsistent lily- and
>pdf-layers.
>Be
Am 01.08.2013 11:07, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
isn't the layer grob property what you want?
no, it isn't ...
but if one comes up with the right pdfmark ps command, there has to be a
check of this layer property to avoid inconsistent lily- and pdf-layers.
Best, Jan-Peter
__
Am 2013-08-01 um 15:25 schrieb David Kastrup :
> Mike Solomon writes:
>
>> As far as I know, the PS standard doesn't support any native form of
>> layering, and LilyPond pre-renders to PS before PDF.
>
> But it converts the PostScript to PDF using Ghostscript, and Ghostscript
> will both read
Mike Solomon writes:
> As far as I know, the PS standard doesn't support any native form of
> layering, and LilyPond pre-renders to PS before PDF.
But it converts the PostScript to PDF using Ghostscript, and Ghostscript
will both read and write PDF and PostScript, so it is quite likely that
ther
Hi Urs,
isn't the layer grob property what you want?
This is what I use to interrupt ties (or slurs) if they collide with a
time signature:
% to have the time sig behind the staff symbol
\override Staff.TimeSignature #'layer = #-5
% whiteout anything behind the time sig
\override Staff.TimeSign
On 1 août 2013, at 11:15, Urs Liska wrote:
> I have brought this up before without success. But as my interest reappeared
> I'll try it again with a slightly more specific question.
>
> When LilyPond finally renders its objects 'on paper' how complicated would it
> be to allow it to print on l
I have brought this up before without success. But as my interest
reappeared I'll try it again with a slightly more specific question.
When LilyPond finally renders its objects 'on paper' how complicated
would it be to allow it to print on layers that show up as separate
layers in the final pd
"Jan Rosseel" writes:
> It's not on-the-fly, but rather on-demand.
>
> Given the slowness of Lilypond, even on a fast machine, one has to count
> many seconds to render a part of a symphony. 4th part of Sibelius5 for
> example takes 20 seconds on a Core i7 for the violin parts. The trombone
> par
It's not on-the-fly, but rather on-demand.
Given the slowness of Lilypond, even on a fast machine, one has to count
many seconds to render a part of a symphony. 4th part of Sibelius5 for
example takes 20 seconds on a Core i7 for the violin parts. The trombone
part is done before I can type this se
30 matches
Mail list logo
