Hi Hraban,
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm
lilypon...@fiee.net wrote:
Hi,
as far as I scanned the thread nobody analyzed the problem of the shifted
umlaut diacritic.
true, but i did find the root cause. ;)
You might look up „composed“ vs. „decomposed“ Unicode - e.g.
Hi all,
today or tomorrow I'm going to finish a paper/talk proposal, and I would
be happy to have a few people read it before submission. LilyPond is
only a small part of it but maybe there is some interest on this list
too. I'm mainly interested in native English speakers, but of course
On 01/17/2014 02:00 AM, Mike Blackstock wrote:
Is there a way to change the textedit://uri mechanism in PDF
point-and-lick links to point instead to a javascript function in the
webbrowser?
I've been looking around, but I know zilch about PDF documents; the
closest
I got was this, which
Am 17.01.2014 09:56, schrieb Simon Bailey:
(I can't remember
which computer i wrote_those_ lines of code on)
You could use Git and configure author name slightly different on each
computer (e.g. sbailey-osx).
That way git blame would tell you that :-)
Urs
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
You could use Git and configure author name slightly different on each
computer (e.g. sbailey-osx).
That way git blame would tell you that :-)
that's actually the first argument FOR git that makes sense for my use case. :D
Reading over the documentation on changing the tie shape for ties in
chords I gather that it is not possible to do this at all:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/modifying-shapes#modifying-ties-and-slurs
It is not possible to modify shapes of ties or slurs by changing the
Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com writes:
Reading over the documentation on changing the tie shape for ties in
chords I gather that it is not possible to do this at all:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/modifying-shapes#modifying-ties-and-slurs
It is not possible
Philip Rhoades phil at pricom.com.au writes:
People,
David took this discussion off-list and then accused me of not having
the guts to respond on-list . .
In an ideal world, I'd suppose that if one needs to preface an email with
grade-school playground ethics, one *might* take that as a
In the material below (sorry, it's about as short as I can make it and
have the problem appear) there should be an \augmetum (dot) following
the last two notes in the first measure. They are not appearing.
\version 2.18.0
\include gregorian.ly
\score {
\new VaticanaVoice = cantus {
\clef
- Original Message -
From: Philip Rhoades p...@pricom.com.au
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: Lilypond User lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 2:43 AM
Subject: Re: Updating Snippets in the LSR when versions are updated
Phil,
On 2014-01-17 03:05, Phil Holmes
Am 17.01.2014 03:51, schrieb Philip Rhoades:
I obviously don't understand why the LSR is being run by a user who
seems to be uncontactable . . why isn't it part of the Lilypond
structure proper? I presume there are historical reasons . .
Well, despite of its importance the LSR is a private
Would it be possible to scrape the LSR for all the snippets and maintain
them as an official repository?
Gonçalo Nogueira
about.me/goncalonogueira
2014/1/17 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
Am 17.01.2014 03:51, schrieb Philip Rhoades:
I obviously don't understand why the LSR is being run by
Hi Ed,
it is actually not missing, but shifted under/behind the neums after the
divisioMinima. That’s not better and I don’t know why it is like that.
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Gonçalo Nogueira jgoncalonogue...@gmail.com writes:
Would it be possible to scrape the LSR for all the snippets and maintain
them as an official repository?
URL:http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/snippets/
But obviously this does not (for now) offer public entry and not the
same
Ed Faulk efa...@faswebdesign.com writes:
In the material below (sorry, it's about as short as I can make it and
have the problem appear) there should be an \augmetum (dot) following
the last two notes in the first measure. They are not appearing.
\version 2.18.0
Is this new to version 2.18?
Well, as long as they're not missing... :+} Still, it does make it hard
to see them. Any idea how to fix their apparent shyness?
Ed
On 1/17/2014 7:45 AM, Noeck wrote:
Hi Ed,
it is actually not missing, but shifted under/behind the neums after the
divisioMinima. That’s not better and I don’t
Hi Alex,
Could you give an example?
I don’t have time right now — under a serious “get it out the door” engraving
crunch.
However, I’m running into the issue right now, and it’s killing my
productivity. I’ve got the following structure for my score:
\new TextLine
It turns out that if I put TWO s8 dummy notes at the end of that
section before the divisoMinima they appear correctly. Really strange
behavior.
Ed
On 1/17/2014 8:32 AM, Ed Faulk wrote:
Well, as long as they're not missing... :+} Still, it does make it
hard to see them. Any idea how to fix
Hello all,
Here’s my semi-annual request-slash-U$25-bounty-offer for an improved whiteout
function…
(cf. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-10/msg00578.html)
Could \whiteout (with settable #’thickness or #’margin parameter) please use
the grob outline, rather than just
Hello,
first of all, let me briefly introduce myself: I'm a student of
composition at the Janáček Academy of Music and Performing Arts in
Brno, Czech Republic, and of IT at Charles University in Prague - in
short, if LilyPond has a bullseye-target audience, I'm probably there
somewhere. I hope I
Jan Hajic, jr. haj...@gmail.com writes:
Let's get to the gist of the matter:
\version 2.18.0
outputTypeTag = isScore
firstInstrument = \relative c' {
\tag #'isPart { \cueDuring #quoteSecondInstrument #UP { r2 } }
\tag #'isScore { r2 }
e4 f |
g4 a b c |
}
secondInstrument= \relative
Jan Hajic, jr. wrote Friday, January 17, 2014 3:53 PM
I would put it in the docs myself, but I'm a little afraid to start
meddling quite so soon :) Should I?
Why not? Nearly all of us involved in development or documentation
had to take that first step at one time. The easiest way to begin
Ed:
In the material below (sorry, it's about as short as I can make it and
have the problem appear) there should be an \augmetum (dot) following
the last two notes in the first measure. They are not appearing.
The dots are there but are obscured by the pes notes at Ie-.
By commenting away
Don't think this will work. As far as I remember quotes, they play a
music expression and record the resulting events in order to replay them
when needed. But those recorded events will not get looked at by
\keepWithTag, so I consider it likely that you always get both versions.
...yes
Davide,
The last “port self update” and “upgrade outdated” appear to have broken
Frescobaldi’s Music View on both my OS 10.6 and 10.9 machines. There is only a
gray screen displayed in the Music View window.
Frescobaldi-devel is installed on both machines and has been working well prior
to
re. As I see it you need to change either the PDF itself or the javascript
code run in the browser to achieve what you want.
I discovered 'pdf.js' - a javascript program that converts pdf to HTML5
on-the-fly. I think if I use that as my pdf viewer in the browser, I can
hack the code to get it to
Dear Stan,
2014/1/17 Stan Sanderson stans...@gmail.com:
The last “port self update” and “upgrade outdated” appear to have broken
Frescobaldi’s Music View on both my OS 10.6 and 10.9 machines. There is only
a gray screen displayed in the Music View window.
this problem is already known.
A
On Jan 17, 2014, at 6:30 PM, Davide Liessi davide.lie...@gmail.com wrote
2014/1/17 Stan Sanderson stans...@gmail.com:
The last “port self update” and “upgrade outdated” appear to have broken
Frescobaldi’s Music View on both my OS 10.6 and 10.9 machines. There is only
a gray screen
28 matches
Mail list logo
