Hello,
A suggestion using spacer notes in the second voice.
Best,
David
\version "2.18.0"
<<
\new Staff {
<<
\new Voice = "first"
\relative c' {
\voiceOne
c1
c'1
c,1
}
\new Voice = "second"
\relative c' {
\voice
...or even:
\version "2.18.0"
<<
\new Voice = "first" {
a'4
<<
{
\voiceOne
g' f'
}
\new Voice = "second" {
\voiceTwo
d'2
}
>>
\oneVoice
e'4
}
\new Lyrics \lyricsto "first" {
One One One
}
\new Lyrics \lyricsto
Am 17.03.2014 04:59, schrieb Paul Morris:
Simon Albrecht-2 wrote
Interesting question: the Internals Reference says the stencil for Dots
is ly:dots::print. But where is this defined? Where can I look it up?
I think at this point the next step is to try to find this callback function
in the sou
Am 17.03.2014 01:45, schrieb Jim Long:
I understand the Cmi7, too, but when sketching
some chords on paper during a Jazz session, a simple "-" is
way faster to write than "mi" all the way.
So it's rather a matter of personal taste IMHO.
Just my 2 cents
Marc
With great respect, I beg to add,
So, again, it boils down to whatever works. There's no standard to this, and
frankly, I've never experienced that as a problem. Jazz music is improvised
music, and I don't know a jazz musician who has problems "improvising" here as
well. Everyone has different preferences, sure, but problems rea
Robert Schmaus writes:
> So, again, it boils down to whatever works. There's no standard to
> this, and frankly, I've never experienced that as a problem. Jazz
> music is improvised music, and I don't know a jazz musician who has
> problems "improvising" here as well. Everyone has different
> pre
-
Von meinem Fliewatüüt gesendet.
> On 17 Mar 2014, at 11:57, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Robert Schmaus writes:
>
>> So, again, it boils down to whatever works. There's no standard to
>> this, and frankly, I've never experienced that as a problem. Jazz
>> music is improvised music, and I don't
Robert Schmaus writes:
> -
> Von meinem Fliewatüüt gesendet.
[full-quote without content elided]
I think Jazz musicians really should get off the habit of only writing -
when it would be so much easier to get their meaning if they were just a
bit more verbose.
--
David Kastrup
__
Oh, I'm sorry. I was looking into the problem some months ago and found a email
correspondence between David kastrup and others about the removal of the
"accepts" technique. I have never seen that it was later replaced by this new
command.
My apologies!
Also for sending an accidental reply ju
Dear community,
I would like to use a scheme-function, but with a different name:
fourquarterRests = #(define-music-function (parser location ANFANG ENDE )
(number? number? )
#{ \scaleDurations #(cons (+ 1(- ENDE ANFANG)) 1) {R1 } #})
I want to use the function with the name "IVvR" but, for bac
Am 17.03.2014 12:21, schrieb Stefan Thomas:
Dear community,
I would like to use a scheme-function, but with a different name:
fourquarterRests = #(define-music-function (parser location ANFANG ENDE )
(number? number? )
#{ \scaleDurations #(cons (+ 1(- ENDE ANFANG)) 1) {R1 } #})
I want to use
Robert Schmaus writes:
> Oh, I'm sorry. I was looking into the problem some months ago and
> found a email correspondence between David kastrup and others about
> the removal of the "accepts" technique. I have never seen that it was
> later replaced by this new command.
There is no new command.
Stefan Thomas writes:
> Dear community,
> I would like to use a scheme-function, but with a different name:
> fourquarterRests = #(define-music-function (parser location ANFANG ENDE )
> (number? number? )
> #{ \scaleDurations #(cons (+ 1(- ENDE ANFANG)) 1) {R1 } #})
>
> I want to use the funct
Urs Liska wrote
> Can't try out a solution right now, but generally you'd have to write a
> "IVvR" function that internally calls the old implementation, as an
> alias frontend, so to say.
Something like this should work:
\version "2.18.0"
IVvR = #(define-music-function (parser location ANFA
David Kastrup wrote
> IVvR = #fourquarterRests
Ah, of course, that's even better!
-Paul
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/using-a-scheme-function-but-with-a-different-name-tp160506p160511.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Check, it works. You cannot handle to do it with regular Arabic keyboard, I
played a little with the Character map and I got the text.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Using-LilyPond-with-Arabic-music-tp32053p160512.html
Sent from the User mailing list arch
On 15.03.2014 09:09, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
Mini example please
~Pierre
Sorry, forgot to post one.
During shortening some code into a mini example, I was actually able to
solve my problem. I'm posting it anyway because I'm not sure it's the
most elegant or clever was of doing.
Short
Am 17.03.2014 19:00, schrieb Matthias Hüsken:
On 15.03.2014 09:09, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
Mini example please
~Pierre
Sorry, forgot to post one.
During shortening some code into a mini example, I was actually able
to solve my problem. I'm posting it anyway because I'm not sure it's
Simon Albrecht writes:
> Am 17.03.2014 19:00, schrieb Matthias Hüsken:
>> On 15.03.2014 09:09, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
>>> Mini example please
>>> ~Pierre
>>
>> Sorry, forgot to post one.
>>
>> During shortening some code into a mini example, I was actually able
>> to solve my problem. I'm
Am 17.03.2014 20:22, schrieb David Kastrup:
Simon Albrecht writes:
Am 17.03.2014 19:00, schrieb Matthias Hüsken:
On 15.03.2014 09:09, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
Mini example please
~Pierre
Sorry, forgot to post one.
During shortening some code into a mini example, I was actually able
t
Simon Albrecht writes:
> In more complex situations with \include and several scores in one
> file it _is_ useful or even necessary, if you want to have one \layout
> definition for all scores in common, but for example remove the
> Mark_engraver (from Score) only for one of the scores. At least
Based on the discussion about minor chords, I had some more general
comments about how lilypond does (or does not) handle chord symbol notation.
Regardless of which symbol choice you make for how to identify chord types,
there are many details of readable chord notation typography that lilypond
d
2014-03-14 10:45 GMT+01:00 Davide Liessi :
> I submitted the update.
> I hope that it will be merged in a couple of days, as usual.
The update has been merged and is now available in MacPorts.
Best wishes.
Davide
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond
2014-03-11 17:19 GMT+01:00 Wilbert Berendsen :
> Frescobaldi 2.0.15 is out.
... and is now available in MacPorts.
Best wishes.
Davide
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
The demos look really nice!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Am 17.03.2014 20:42, schrieb David Kastrup:
Simon Albrecht writes:
In more complex situations with \include and several scores in one
file it _is_ useful or even necessary, if you want to have one \layout
definition for all scores in common, but for example remove the
Mark_engraver (from Scor
Thank You All!
On Mar 17, 2014, at 3:43 PM, Davide Liessi wrote:
> 2014-03-11 17:19 GMT+01:00 Wilbert Berendsen :
>> Frescobaldi 2.0.15 is out.
>
> ... and is now available in MacPorts.
>
> Best wishes.
> Davide
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
Graham Percival-2 wrote
> Here's a slightly updated version of my "produce the same score on
> A4 and letter paper". Should be easier to understand.
>
> Valentin, could you add a wishlist for LSR: snippets that don't
> produce any output. I'd like to check a box and have LSR not even
> attempt t
28 matches
Mail list logo